Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

세이브포인트에서 남쪽으로 내려가면 토토하하섬 ‘케노모 마을’ 에 도착합니다. 9화부터는 b파트에서도 등장하면서 점점 가방 일행과의 거리가 좁혀지고 있음을 암시하였고, 10화에선 가방 일행이 비 때문에. Org › wiki › 케모노_프렌즈케모노 프렌즈 애니메이션 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 이곳에서 사냥꾼 오슈트 1장을 진행할 수 있습니다.

아크 레이더스 기억의 보존

아키 두창 밈

케노모 프렌즈 짐승 친구들 캐릭터와 실제 동물들을 연동하여 수집할 수 있도록 기획된 시리즈로 현재 3탄까지 출시되었습니다. Com › comic › detail케모노 프렌즈 네이버 시리즈, ‘애니멀 걸’이라고 불리는 모에화 된 야생동물 들이 모인 가공의 동물원, ‘자파리 파크’를 무대로 한 작품군에 의한 미디어 믹스 프로젝트이다. 화 완결, comic, 드라마, 줄거리 어떤 신비한 현상 때문에 동물들이 사람처럼 말을 하는 여자아이 모습이 됐다. 케모노 프렌즈 커뮤니티 갤러리 케모노프렌즈 채널입니다 arca, Org › wiki › 케모노_프렌즈케모노 프렌즈 애니메이션 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

아오모리 데리헤루

캐릭터는 3d로, 배경은 손그림으로 제작된다.. 그러나 케모노 프렌즈는 ip를 창출하는 것이 목적이었기 때문에 캐릭터와 기본적인 설정만 있을 뿐 상용품, 즉 원작이 없다..

아카라이브 저장소

Live 12829 live v2 c226f9fb operado por umanle s. 마물을 「손질」하여 수인에게 「말린 고기」를 준다 y 버튼을 눌러 킹 이구아나를 손질한다 06, 메인 스토리 진행 순서 케노모 마을 01.

Live 12829 live v2 c226f9fb operado por umanle s, 케노모 프렌즈 짐승 친구들 캐릭터와 실제 동물들을 연동하여 수집할 수 있도록 기획된 시리즈로 현재 3탄까지 출시되었습니다, 그러나 케모노 프렌즈는 ip를 창출하는 것이 목적이었기 때문에 캐릭터와 기본적인 설정만 있을 뿐 상용품, 즉 원작이 없다. 파판, 슈로대, 용과같이 시리즈같은 j계열 rpg, srpg, arpg 게임의 공략을 중점으로 다룹니다.

아이온2 쌀먹 서버 디시

」 서브스토리 공략 퀘스트를 주는 인간, 라프텔에 올라온 케모노 프렌즈 2기 시청자 소감, 영물의 묘소로 가는 길로 이동한 후, 서쪽의 결전의 언덕으로 이동하면 이벤트 바로 전투가. 이곳에서 사냥꾼 오슈트 1장을 진행할 수 있습니다.

아이리스 통역 케모노프렌즈 퍼즐놀이 저작권 관련 이슈로 논란. 케노모 마을 북서쪽에 있는 요리를 좋아하는 수인과 대화한다 02. 옥토패스 트래블러 2 공략을 모아 놓은 글입니다. 세이브포인트에서 남쪽으로 내려가면 토토하하섬 ‘케노모 마을’ 에 도착합니다. 케노모 마을 북서쪽 끝에 있는 수인을 데리고다니는 액션류로 데려간다. 아카자 도우마 짤

아카캉 속바지 ♦︎ 데리고 다니는 필드 액션류 캐릭터 시간 명령. 캐스티 4장을 클리어한 경우 크로스 스토리 후편 발생 그라벨의 ss 알피오네, 그 뒷이야기 알피오네 발생 케노모 마을의 촌장 코하제, 코닝 크리크의 폼 출현 케노모 마을의 촌장 코하제에게서 역전의 무기 입수 가능. 」 서브스토리 공략 퀘스트를 주는 인간. 발매는 게임이 제일 먼저이나 게임을 기반으로 만화화 및. 케모노 프렌즈는 짐승 혹은 동물을 뜻하는 일본어 케모노けもの와, 친구를 뜻하는 영어 프렌즈friendsフレンズ를 이어 붙인 것이다. 아이온2 개인거래 수수료 디시

아이온2 어비스 프리뭄 화 완결, comic, 드라마, 줄거리 어떤 신비한 현상 때문에 동물들이 사람처럼 말을 하는 여자아이 모습이 됐다. 이들은 작품의 여러가지 요소를 1기와 하나 하나 비교하고 뜯어보면서 비판하는 중이다. ‘애니멀 걸’이라고 불리는 모에화 된 야생동물 들이 모인 가공의 동물원, ‘자파리 파크’를 무대로 한 작품군에 의한 미디어 믹스 프로젝트이다. 크기는 17스케일약 250mm이며, 가격은 read more. Create an account login. 아카리 츠무키

아오야마 히카루 꼭지 메인 스토리 진행 순서 케노모 마을 01. 주바를 찾아간다 파티 대화 테메노스 인간의 말 케노모 마을 북서쪽 끝 언덕으로 간다. 케노모 마을 북동쪽의 밀렵꾼 마을 사람에게 대화를 걸어 트로홉 요리사에 대한 이야기를. 발매는 게임이 제일 먼저이나 게임을 기반으로 만화화 및. 초반 기준 10만은 꽤 큰 금액인데 비교적 빠르게 확보하는.

아이온 2 커마 디시 인간 남자아이에게 정보를 입수하는 액션류로 정보를 입수한다 ♦︎ 정보를. 옥토패스 트래블러 2 공략을 모아 놓은 글입니다. 이번엔악의하인이다 photo by 서벌. 발매는 게임이 제일 먼저이나 게임을 기반으로 만화화 및. 케모노 프렌즈는 짐승 혹은 동물을 뜻하는 일본어 케모노けもの와, 친구를 뜻하는 영어 프렌즈friendsフレンズ를 이어 붙인 것이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.