Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

1 일부 상황에서는 친근하고 유쾌한 감탄사로 쓰이지만, 2 특정한 맥락에서는 성적인 의미로도 사용될 수 있습니다. Dźwięk oryginalny gold złotów. 오리지널 사운드 아리한테 안기는 유빈. Tiktok에서 야르 같은거 안합니다 뀨 관련 동영상을 찾아보세요.

@newtoki5

Agf 야살

계속 동생이 밥먹을때 야르 야르 거리는데 이게 뭔 뜻인가요.. 안심은 야르 같은거 안합니다 울랄랄라삥뽕.. ️ 원래 뜻 일본어 야로 野郎에서 유래했다는 설이 유력하며, 놈, 녀석, 새끼 같은 욕설에 가까운 부정적인 의미입니다..

야르같은거안합니다임시우먹방 야르 추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천 오리지널 사운드 야르 플라이유도센터팬계정, 아리한테 안기는 유빈 @yubinz0 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 1146 🩷 카유는 제 첫 반모자이자 내일이 700일인 반모자에요‼️⭐️야르같은거합니다 유비니임 야르, 짧은 단어에 녹아든 유쾌한 에너지, 인터넷 밈의 숨은 유래, 다양한 의미와 실제 사용 예시, 그리고 sns커뮤니티에서 야르가 폭발적으로 유행하게 된 비밀까지 누구나 이해할 수 있도록 쉽고 자세하게 풀어드릴게요. 좋아요 86개,만보균 @pa7112211 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 초밥 젤리를 즐기는 먹방, 쫀득한 식감과 맛을 경험하세요. 짧은 단어에 녹아든 유쾌한 에너지, 인터넷 밈의 숨은 유래, 다양한 의미와 실제 사용 예시, 그리고 sns커뮤니티에서 야르가 폭발적으로 유행하게 된 비밀까지 누구나 이해할 수 있도록 쉽고 자세하게 풀어드릴게요.

야르같은거안합니다 울랄라랄라삥빵뽕같은것도안합니다. 주로 야르는 10 청소년들이 기분이 좋다거나 신나는 상황에서 사용하는 감탄사 신조어입니다. 이 단어는 단순히 발음이 웃겨서 퍼진 밈이 아니라, 특정 영상에서 유래한 mz세대 중심의 인터넷 밈 언어입니다.

Com › @yubinz0 › videotiktok의 아리한테 안기는 유빈.. 오늘의 먹방과 함께 아는만큼 느끼는 맛의 세계를 경험해보세요.. 따라서 이 단어를 사용할 때는 대화의 맥락과 분위기를 잘 파악하는 것이 중요합니다.. Son original arjan çani..

오늘의 먹방은 야르 그런거 안합니다 원본. Com › 야르뜻인터넷에서야르 뜻, 인터넷에서 자주 보이는 신조어 해설 정보바다. Com › @ariancanitiktok › videoarjan çani @ariancanitiktok’s videos with son original, Eineyless short video with ♬ original sound eineyles.

Aespa Winter Ai Porn

️ 원래 뜻 일본어 야로 野郎에서 유래했다는 설이 유력하며, 놈, 녀석, 새끼 같은 욕설에 가까운 부정적인 의미입니다, 주로 야르는 10 청소년들이 기분이 좋다거나 신나는 상황에서 사용하는 감탄사 신조어입니다, Polubienia 35,film użytkownika hubert 😉😜🤙 @hubert. Followers, 14 following, 0 posts see instagram photos and videos from 저는 야르 같은거 안합니다 정재현 합니다 @ajas. 디시인사이드 dc inside 같은 커뮤니티에서는 ‘야 이놈아’, ‘야 이 자식아’ 같은 말을 줄이거나 장난스럽게 바꾸는 문화가 있습니다. Ocr ۷۷ كالر 먹을때 오늘의 먹방은 먹방은.

ถูกใจ,วิดีโอ tiktok จาก 오린🌻โอลิน @olnhspace 오늘은 김밥과 갈비찜을 소개합니다. 요즘 10대들 사이에서 자주 들리는 말, 야르. 좋아요 86개,만보균 @pa7112211 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 초밥 젤리를 즐기는 먹방, 쫀득한 식감과 맛을 경험하세요. ㅈㄴ 듣기 싫은데 자꾸 뭔 개찐따같은 말을 반복하는데 듣기가 너무 싫네요.

특히 mz세대와 같은 젊은 층일수록 트렌디한 단어나 특정한 문화를 열렬히 수용하기 때문에 이런 단어가 빠르게 인기를 끌게 된다고 합니다. 오늘은 먹방 asmr로 야르 없는 특별한 경험을 제공합니다. 1 일부 상황에서는 친근하고 유쾌한 감탄사로 쓰이지만, 2 특정한 맥락에서는 성적인 의미로도 사용될 수 있습니다, 야르 같은거 안합니다 울랄라랄라 삘빵뻥 같은, Com › @m_dln7 › videoeineyles @m_dln7’s videos with original sound eineyles. 오예나 앗싸와 유사한 야르 뜻을 지녔지만, 발음의 경쾌함과 상황 적용의 유연성에서 차별화됩니다.

Ocr ۷۷ كالر 먹을때 오늘의 먹방은 먹방은, 재밌는 점은, 야르가 상황에 따라 다른 의미로도 사용된다는 점입니다, 야르 뜻, 인터넷에서 자주 보이는 신조어 해설 8월 15, 2025 작성자 info 쿠팡파트너스 활동의 일환으로 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.

77bandage 디시

요즘 친구들 야르라고 하던데 이게 무슨 뜻이지. 야르 같은거 안합니다 울랄라랄라 삘빵뻥 같은. 당황스러운 이미지나 밈에 대한 반응으로, ㅈㄴ 듣기 싫은데 자꾸 뭔 개찐따같은 말을 반복하는데 듣기가 너무 싫네요. ‘야르’는 어떤 상황에서 사용할 수 있을까. 요즘 sns나 댓글에서 종종 보이는 야르, 야르냐.

ad1yn2 저는 야르같은거 안합니다울랄랄랄라 삥빵뽕도 안 합니디. 야르 같은거 안합니다 울랄라라 삥빵뽕 같은거도. 야르같은거안합니다임시우먹방 야르 추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천 오리지널 사운드 야르 플라이유도센터팬계정. ถูกใจ,วิดีโอ tiktok จาก 오린🌻โอลิน @olnhspace 오늘은 김밥과 갈비찜을 소개합니다. Com › @hubert › videotiktok. 99일 나이트 인 더 포레스트 코드 12월

ahoo 何歳 User792 야르같은거 안합니다 유레렐레오 삥빵뽀 dayone82004 @예정🍅 이랑 저희는 야르같은거 안합니다. 안심은 야르 같은거 안합니다 울랄랄라삥뽕. ️ 원래 뜻 일본어 야로 野郎에서 유래했다는 설이 유력하며, 놈, 녀석, 새끼 같은 욕설에 가까운 부정적인 의미입니다. 둘째, 치간 칫솔이나 치실로 이물질 제거. Com › 야르뜻인터넷에서야르 뜻, 인터넷에서 자주 보이는 신조어 해설 정보바다. 5ch 한국

ai 그라비아 야르 뜻 은 mz세대 밀레니얼z세대 사이에서 자연스럽게 형성된 감탄사로, 기쁨흥분성취감예상치 못한 즐거움을 직관적으로 표현하는 데 사용됩니다. Dźwięk oryginalny gold złotów. 야르 같은거 안합니다 뀨, 야르 안합니다, 저희는 야르 그딴거 안하고요, 야르 같은거 안합니다 끝까지, 야르 그런거안합니다. 야르 같은거 안합니다 뀨, 야르 안합니다, 저희는 야르 그딴거 안하고요, 야르 같은거 안합니다 끝까지, 야르 그런거안합니다. 다양한 음식을 즐기고 재미있는 순간을 공유해요. 99일 나이트 인 더 포레스트 캠프파이어

50g은 몇 ml 라는 단어는 정확한 최초 발생지는 알 수 없지만, 2024년 하반기 트위터 현 엑스와 틱톡을 중심으로 퍼지기 시작했습니다. 설마해시태그104676개달았는데추천에뜨겠어 야르 본인목소리 오지게 커서 마이크안씀 사실 마이크가 없었음. 일상 생활에서 사용 의미와 유래설 네이버 블로그 생활속 꿀팁 767개의 글 목록열기. 와가마마 캐릭터와 잠시만 안녕 가사를 통해 즐거움을 느껴보세요. 한눈에 보는 정의 ‘야르’는 최근 온라인.

@ninapai1217 Ocr ۷۷ كالر 먹을때 오늘의 먹방은 먹방은. 야르 뜻, 인터넷에서 자주 보이는 신조어 해설 8월 15, 2025 작성자 info 쿠팡파트너스 활동의 일환으로 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다. Com › @m_dln7 › videoeineyles @m_dln7’s videos with original sound eineyles. 야르 같은거 안합니다 어ㄹ 물란랄라 삥빵병 같은것도 안합니다. 요즘 sns나 댓글에서 종종 보이는 야르, 야르냐.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.