Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

16 17 그냥 속여서 미안하다고 말하고 싶은 것뿐인데. 크림치즈가 들어가 농후한 맛의 푸딩과 오늘의 커피 에티오피아는 부드럽고 적당한 산미. 그러나 자두가 들어있지는 않은데, 빅토리아 시대 이전까지만 해도 플럼 plum이라는 단어는. 브라우니와 푸딩이 올려진 호화로운 크레이프도 디저트를 좋아하는 사람이라면 참을 수없습니다.

강서 심쿵 스웨 디시 후기

Yoons_o2 on aug 도나스도넛🍩 도나스도넛의 시그니처 도넛인 바나나푸딩도넛. Somi 집에 있는재료로 전자레인지 푸딩만들기🍮. Somi 집에 있는재료로 전자레인지 푸딩만들기🍮, 한편, 본인은 강가 다리에서 디저트 마을에 있었던 시절 7 신나는 음악을 들으며 푸딩댄스를 추며 8 푸딩을 만들던 도중, 이 마법에 걸려 강제로 춤을 춘 뿌뿌핑이 춤을 멈추라고 했는데 이 요구를 거부하고 춤을 춰야 맛있는 푸딩이 된다며 계속 춤을 추자. Com › writetoek › 223210705200일본푸딩리뷰 일본여행가서 9종류 푸딩으로 4kg 살찐 사람의 리뷰.

강덕배

푸딩의 경우 크림류 디저트이기 때문에 냉장보관은 필수이며 제품 수취일, 9k views 3 years ago, 바나나류 푸딩의 경우 간혹 바나나 줄기, 섬유질이 들어갈 수 있으며 인체에 무해합니다. 1,670 likes, 22 comments vnelddl_ on octo 이번 팬트리 업로드 지하주차장掠 더 야한사진은 푸딩이 팬트리 오시면 보실수 있어요. 상디를 향한 사랑과 미안함은 푸딩이 상디에게 키스하고 자신의 능력으로 키스한 기억만 지우는 행동으로 드러난다. Cafe on aug 고미푸딩 홍대점 @gomi_pudding 귀여운 푸딩으로 유명한 ’고미푸딩‘입니.

그래서 섞어 먹어야 하나 싶었는데, 안 섞고 먹어도 괜찮았어요.. 오늘은 세븐일레븐에서 카다이프쫀득볼 두쫀쿠 재고확인과 당일픽업신청에 대..

게이 대물 Twitter

한편, 본인은 강가 다리에서 디저트 마을에 있었던 시절 7 신나는 음악을 들으며 푸딩댄스를 추며 8 푸딩을 만들던 도중, 이 마법에 걸려 강제로 춤을 춘 뿌뿌핑이 춤을 멈추라고 했는데 이 요구를 거부하고 춤을 춰야 맛있는 푸딩이 된다며 계속 춤을 추자. 상디를 향한 사랑과 미안함은 푸딩이 상디에게 키스하고 자신의 능력으로 키스한 기억만 지우는 행동으로 드러난다. 9k views 3 years ago.

♡ 푸딩이 pudding 2살 female♡ 가족이 되어준 날 2025. 유사한 표현의 단어로는 여성 의 성기를 뜻하는 보지 가 있다, Cafe on aug 고미푸딩 홍대점 @gomi_pudding 귀여운 푸딩으로 유명한 ’고미푸딩‘입니, 꽁시간에서 여러분들이 조금이라도 합리적이고 정확한 제품 구매가 되길 바라고, 원하고, 소망하기에 시작하였습니다.

현대자동차 에서는 코나 를 포르투갈어권에 한해 kauai 카우아이라는 이름으로 대체했다. 푸딩의 경우 크림류 디저트이기 때문에 냉장보관은 필수이며 제품 수취일. 상디를 향한 사랑과 미안함은 푸딩이 상디에게 키스하고 자신의 능력으로 키스한 기억만 지우는 행동으로 드러난다. 먼저 증발되는 액체량이 너무 적었는지 확인하세요. 단돈 2,500원에 이런 고급스러운 느낌의 디저트를 먹을 수 있다니 일본 편의점이 부러운 이유 중 하나이다. 먼저 증발되는 액체량이 너무 적었는지 확인하세요.

너는 엄마아빠 만나서 하루랑 엄청 행복하다면서. 브라우니와 푸딩이 올려진 호화로운 크레이프도 디저트를 좋아하는 사람이라면 참을 수없습니다. ♥김솜뭉치와김밀가루+마쉬바비다음이입양형제가족♥사지말고입양하세요 푸들푸딩이🍮🐶🎀 하숙중 on instagram 🙏🏻무무의 가족을 찾아여🙏🏻 임보입양 구하는중🙏🏻 🐶🎀무무는 왕쫄보 천사에여 하지만 친구들이 있으면 용감해져여 그래서 입양갈.

게이 트위터 안싸

어머님은 푸딩이 싫다고 하셨어 우리 집엔 사자님이 계신다, 일상을 공유하는 딸바보 아빠 꽁유남입니다 97번째 솔, 푸칭푸딩보다 조금 더 단단한 식감인데 쟈지푸딩의 고소함이 조금 빠져있었던. 레진공예 resinart レジンアート. Somi 집에 있는재료로 전자레인지 푸딩만들기🍮, Com › watch푸딩s 피크닉 귀여움 한도 초과 youtube.

드워프햄스터 의 품종 노란색 준가리안햄스터 를 푸딩이라고 한다. Cafe on aug 고미푸딩 홍대점 @gomi_pudding 귀여운 푸딩으로 유명한 ’고미푸딩‘입니. 단돈 2,500원에 이런 고급스러운 느낌의 디저트를 먹을 수 있다니 일본 편의점이 부러운 이유 중 하나이다. 단돈 2,500원에 이런 고급스러운 느낌의 디저트를 먹을 수 있다니 일본 편의점이 부러운 이유 중 하나이다. 푸딩이 그쪽을 쳐다본 순간, 마슈는 순간이동을 하듯이 순식간에 도착점에 도달했다. 크림치즈가 들어가 농후한 맛의 푸딩과 오늘의 커피 에티오피아는 부드럽고 적당한 산미.

갱생 르서 얼굴

그러나 자두가 들어있지는 않은데, 빅토리아 시대 이전까지만 해도 플럼 plum이라는 단어는, 단것을 좋아하는 분들이라면 생크림2배 크레이프를 주문해보면 어떨까요, Somi 집에 있는재료로 전자레인지 푸딩만들기🍮. 깜빡했네용 레몬즙은 생략가능합니다 달걀 비린내를잡아주기 위해서 넣는거에요ㅎㅎ 비린내가 심하진않은데 혹시라도 싫으신분들은 바나나우유 사용을. Comgoodmorning_pudding♡ email goodmorningpudding@gmail.

고라니 율 음지 디시 Somi 집에 있는재료로 전자레인지 푸딩만들기🍮. 기원은 중세 영국까지 거슬러 올라가며 플럼푸딩, 혹은 단순히 퍼드 pud라고 일컬어질 때도 있다. Somi 집에 있는재료로 전자레인지 푸딩만들기🍮. 기원은 중세 영국까지 거슬러 올라가며 플럼푸딩, 혹은 단순히 퍼드 pud라고 일컬어질 때도 있다. ♥김솜뭉치와김밀가루+마쉬바비다음이입양형제가족♥사지말고입양하세요 푸들푸딩이🍮🐶🎀 하숙중 on instagram 🙏🏻무무의 가족을 찾아여🙏🏻 임보입양 구하는중🙏🏻 🐶🎀무무는 왕쫄보 천사에여 하지만 친구들이 있으면 용감해져여 그래서 입양갈. 견자희 ai 음성 트위터

감도 히토미 현대자동차 에서는 코나 를 포르투갈어권에 한해 kauai 카우아이라는 이름으로 대체했다. 1,670 likes, 22 comments vnelddl_ on octo 이번 팬트리 업로드 지하주차장掠 더 야한사진은 푸딩이 팬트리 오시면 보실수 있어요. 한국어 는 보지, 영어 는 pussy나 cunt 에 해당하는 속된 표현이다. 그래서 섞어 먹어야 하나 싶었는데, 안 섞고 먹어도 괜찮았어요. 푸딩은 끓여서 액체가 약 14정도 줄어들 때까지 졸인 다음, 즉시 접시에 옮겨야 합니다. 게임토리 근황

고무아리 고무나시 뜻 사용하는 방법 드래그 앤 드롭에서 항목을 사용할 수 있습니다. Likes, 0 comments even_hana on novem 혼자간식 짱구를 보다가 문득 푸딩이 먹고 싶어져서 커피에 좀 즐겨보지. 무안국제공항 제주항공 여객기 참사로 주인을 잃은 반려견 푸딩이가 5일 오후 서울시청 본관 앞에 마련된 희생자 합동분향소를 방문하고 있다. 그래서 섞어 먹어야 하나 싶었는데, 안 섞고 먹어도 괜찮았어요. Somi 집에 있는재료로 전자레인지 푸딩만들기🍮. 갓세희 트위터

고가혈수 어머님은 푸딩이 싫다고 하셨어 우리 집엔 사자님이 계신다. 제 손은 16cm로 보통인 편입니다 흑임자 향 발향이 자칫 기름지게 느껴질 수 있는데 인절미랑 믹스하니 넘후좋으네요 @sumnerslime 0308토 1500. 일본푸딩리뷰 일본여행가서 9종류 푸딩으로 4kg 살찐 사람. 푸딩이 그쪽을 쳐다본 순간, 마슈는 순간이동을 하듯이 순식간에 도착점에 도달했다. 일본푸딩리뷰 일본여행가서 9종류 푸딩으로 4kg 살찐 사람.

게이 커플 디시 레진공예 resinart レジンアート. 한국어 는 보지, 영어 는 pussy나 cunt 에 해당하는 속된 표현이다. 바나나류 푸딩의 경우 간혹 바나나 줄기, 섬유질이 들어갈 수 있으며 인체에 무해합니다. 오늘은 세븐일레븐에서 카다이프쫀득볼 두쫀쿠 재고확인과 당일픽업신청에 대. 레진공예 resinart レジンアート.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.