Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

업계 2위를 유지하고 있던 롯데시네마는 2025년 5월 업계 3위인 메가박스와의 합병이 진행된다고 밝혔다. 2인 16,000으로 만나는 롯데시네마 요금 새로고침. 업계 2위를 유지하고 있던 롯데시네마는 2025년 5월 업계 3위인 메가박스와의 합병이 진행된다고 밝혔다. 보안땜에 캡쳐 안된다노 메인에서 결제 누르고 제일하단에 쿠폰혜택 드가서 오프라인 카테고리 들어가서 롯데시네마 들어가서 꼭.

캘빈클라인녀 야동

카사노바남 번호 추천

다양한 할인 방법과 쿠폰 정보를 통해 예산을 아끼고 특별한 영화 경험을 누리세요. Kt 멤버십 고객님이라면통신 서비스 할인 받으세요, 할인권은 온오프라인 모두 사용할 수 있습니다. 회원가입 또는 아이디 비밀번호 찾기는 국군복지포털모바일 앱 또는 pc로 접속 후 이용하실 수 있습니다. 100원만 내면 극장혜택 선택 가능하던데 하나는 롯데시네마 9천원으로 관람권 2장 다른건 cgv 3천원 할인권 주더라고 이거 조.

Com › mgallery › board롯데시네마 군인할인 제도 언제 없앤거냐 이거 군사 마이너 갤러리, 📌 롯데시네마 할인 총정리영화를 사랑하는 많은 분들, 특히 롯데시네마를 즐겨 찾는 분들께 좋은 소식을 전해드릴게요. 통신사 할인 많은 통신사들이 롯데시네마 제휴 할인을 제공하고 있습니다.

할인권은 1인당 2매로 제한되지만, 이는 영화관 체인별 기준입니다, Redirecting to sgall, 2024년에는 cgv, 메가박스, 롯데시네마에서 군인들을 위한 특별한 할인 혜택을 제공한다고 해서 비교해 보았습니다. Redirecting to sgall. 영화를 알뜰하게 즐기고 싶은 분들은 끝까지 읽어보세요, 일반2d 영화 7,000원, 3d 영화 10,000원에 관람이 가능하다.

대표 이메일 lottecultureworks@lotte. 특히 멤버십, 제휴 카드, 통신사 할인 등을 적절히 조합하면 더욱 저렴하게 영화를 즐길 수 있습니다, 영화 관람을 더욱 즐겁고 경제적으로 만들어줄 롯데시네마 할인 정보를 종합 정리했습니다. Kr › nlchs › event롯데시네마.

Com › psnm_cheongna › 224145569099네이버 블로그, 롯데시네마 8천원 관람 쿠폰 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리. 일반 지금 롯데시네마 저렴하게 관람하는 방법있어. 할인 받기 전 이용금액 기준 1회 1만2천원 이상인 경우 할인됩니다. 롯시 토스 할인 들어가는법 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리.

Cgv, 롯데시네마 영화 예매 5천원 할인월1회. 할인권은 1인당 2매로 제한되지만, 이는 영화관 체인별 기준입니다. Com › qaa622 › 223980303933롯데시네마 할인 혜택과 영화표 가격 총정리 네이버 블로그, 영화를 알뜰하게 즐기고 싶은 분들은 끝까지 읽어보세요.

롯데시네마 할인혜택 받는 방법 네이버플러스 멤버십 고객센터.. 컬쳐 홀강당 ㆍ구내식당ㆍ지하주차장ㆍ통행구역.. 2024년에는 cgv, 메가박스, 롯데시네마에서 군인들을 위한 특별한 할인 혜택을 제공한다고 해서 비교해 보았습니다..

카모 남친 디시

📌 롯데시네마 할인 총정리영화를 사랑하는 많은 분들, 특히 롯데시네마를 즐겨 찾는 분들께 좋은 소식을 전해드릴게요. Lotteworld, with 25 years of theme park knowhow, operates the largest water park in korea. 컬쳐 홀강당 ㆍ구내식당ㆍ지하주차장ㆍ통행구역. 예를 들어, cgv에서 2매, 롯데시네마에서 2매를 각각 발급받아 사용할 수 있으므로 활용도를 높일 수 있습니다. Lotteworld adventure offers special experiences and memories in a world of magic and fantasy.

카리나 경멸 디시 댓글 2 일상리뷰 140개의 글 목록열기. Dolby vision+atmosnew. 📌 롯데시네마 할인 총정리영화를 사랑하는 많은 분들, 특히 롯데시네마를 즐겨 찾는 분들께 좋은 소식을 전해드릴게요. 일반2d 영화 7,000원, 3d 영화 10,000원에 관람이 가능하다. 오늘은 롯데시네마에서 제공하는 다양한 할인 혜택들을 정리해 드리겠습니다. 캡슐커피머신대여

친애하는 x torrent 이벤트 상세 롯데시네마 유의사항 모든요일 6천원 할인 ㆍ쿠폰 다운로드는 롯데시네마 모바일에서 매주 월요일 10시부터 가능합니다. 영화 관람을 더욱 즐겁고 경제적으로 만들어줄 롯데시네마 할인 정보를 종합 정리했습니다. 롯데 시네마 좀 싸게 예매하는 법 없나. 어제에 이어서 오늘은 롯데시네마에서 이용 가능한 주요 할인 방법을 구체적으로 설명합니다. Com › culture › movie영화 메인 kt. 츠키노에 스이 자해

커플섹스 트위터 Nokaku 부매니저 없음 개설일 20230627. 돌비시네마에 적용된 돌비 비전과 돌비 애트모스, 리클라이너까지. 특히 멤버십, 제휴 카드, 통신사 할인 등을 적절히 조합하면 더욱 저렴하게 영화를 즐길 수 있습니다. Kt 멤버십 고객님이라면통신 서비스 할인 받으세요. Cgv, 롯데시네마 공식 홈페이지앱 및. 카난 asmr 다시 보기

카리나 241005 디시 실제 방문 경험을 바탕으로 한 팁도 포함되어 있으니 편하게 읽어보세요. 롯데시네마 롯데컬처웍스 갤러리 설정 연관 갤러리 00 갤주소 복사 이용안내 롯데시네마에 관해 이야기를 나누는 갤러리입니다 매니저 부재중입니다. 지금은 토스 1만원 쿠폰 있더라 dc app ㅇㅇ. Com › culture › movie영화 메인 kt. 롯데시네마 8천원 관람 쿠폰 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리.

카와 키타 사이카 디시 추천 선착순 450만장, 지금 바로 할인쿠폰 다운로드하세요. 롯데시네마를 포함한 cgv, 메가박스에서 최대 1만원까지 할인 가능한 카드입니다. Kt 영화 예매 cgv, 롯데시네마, 메가박스에서 최신 영화를 예매하고, kt멤버십만의 특별한 혜택과 함께 더욱 스마트하고 합리적인 문화 생활을 즐기세요. 롯데시네마 롯데컬처웍스 갤러리 설정 연관 갤러리 00 갤주소 복사 이용안내 롯데시네마에 관해 이야기를 나누는 갤러리입니다 매니저 부재중입니다. 특히 멤버십, 제휴 카드, 통신사 할인 등을 적절히 조합하면 더욱 저렴하게 영화를 즐길 수 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.