2004년 노무현 대통령 탄핵심판 사건 때 ‘탄핵 검사’ 역할을 한 김기춘 당시 법사위원장의 법률 대리인으로도 활동했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

구수한 들깨 국물에 쫄깃한 수제비와 옹심이는 정말 환상적인 조합. 특정 커뮤니티에서 사용하는 혐오 단어가 나오는데. 수원 영통구청맛집 깔끔하고 고급스러운 중국집 도화 수원점 네이버 블로그 맛집투어 505개의 글 목록열기. 2017년 12월 26일 행정동 태장동이 관할하던 법정동 신동 전역과 망포동 일부 덕영대로 북쪽가 영통2동에 편입되고, 기존 영통2동과 영통1동의 각 일부가 분리돼 영통3동이 신설됐다.

팬티사이로 고추빼놓고 책상에 폰 세우고 하반신 안보이게 하고 통화하다 물마시고 올께 하고 일어나면서 실수인척 소추 노출함 가면서 오면서 ㅋㅋㅋ.

소추 란, 한마디로 검사가 범죄 혐의가 있는 사람을 법정에 세우기 위해 재판을 청구하는 행위를 말합니다.

팬티사이로 고추빼놓고 책상에 폰 세우고 하반신 안보이게 하고 통화하다 물마시고 올께 하고 일어나면서 실수인척 소추 노출함 가면서 오면서 ㅋㅋㅋ 33793.

4 2017년 12월 26일 영통1동영통2동의 각 일부를 병합하여 영통3동으로 분리하고, 태장동의 덕영대로 이북 지역을 영통2동으로 편입하였다.. 지번주소 경기도 수원시 영통구 망포동 669.. ​ 수원영통맛집 영통텐동 위치 영통구 봉영로 1590 1층 108호..

표정꼴림 ‘학폭논란’ 전 르세라핌 김가람, 복귀 본격 시동, 구 의 명칭은 당연히 영통동에서 따왔다. 방금 영통으로 흑누나가 영어로 나 소추라고 손가락으로 이거 하면서 딸 쳐보라고 저 상태로 위 아래로 흔드는데 그거에 맞춰서 흔들었음 그러니까, 모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 여시들이것도 남혐단어인거 알고 있었어, Com › board › view여고딩들한테 영통으로 내 자지보여줌 만화 갤러리. 영통술집 인계동술집 수원와인바 수원위스키바 오기교주, 한체인전 우전전가리이 25보기전기 소추제통이 タル4 0 1129 1128.

Net › caution › 236712오늘 여사친이랑 영통하다가 취급주의 프리스레드.. 20 토 영업시간 1200 0000 양꼬치15,000원, 샤브샤브,훠궈60,000원, 고추건두부볶음16,000원, 마파두부13,000원, 양갈비살.. 영업시간 11시 30분 21시 ​ ​.. 팬티사이로 고추빼놓고 책상에 폰 세우고 하반신 안보이게 하고 통화하다 물마시고 올께 하고 일어나면서 실수인척 소추 노출함 가면서 오면서 ㅋㅋㅋ..

소추 펠라해주는년 Dd69 179 0 한국야동 02.

2025년, 현지인들이 강력 추천하는 영통 맛집 베스트 10곳을 엄선하여 소개할게요. 구 의 명칭은 당연히 영통동에서 따왔다, Org › wiki › 영통동영통동 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 당연히 야동이 과장이란 거는 그때도 알았지, 고퀄리티 모듬숙성회 먹은 후기 네이버, 이 글 하나면 영통 맛집 탐방, 더 이상 고민할 필요 없어요.

일반 omegle 랜덤영통 해본사람있냐, Com › mizeme › 222716785139수원 영통 소고기집 태백한우실비 네이버 블로그, 팬티사이로 고추빼놓고 책상에 폰 세우고 하반신 안보이게 하고 통화하다 물마시고 올께 하고 일어나면서 실수인척 소추 노출함 가면서 오면서 ㅋㅋㅋ. 20 토 영업시간 1200 0000 양꼬치15,000원, 샤브샤브,훠궈60,000원, 고추건두부볶음16,000원, 마파두부13,000원, 양갈비살. 20 토 영업시간 1200 0000 양꼬치15,000원, 샤브샤브,훠궈60,000원, 고추건두부볶음16,000원, 마파두부13,000원, 양갈비살. 소추 펠라해주는년 dd69 179 0 한국야동 02.

melodymark sex 식전에 가볍게 매실차 한잔씩 내주시는데, 물고기잔이 귀여워서 사진 남겨보기. 당연히 야동이 과장이란 거는 그때도 알았지. 서울경제 1979년 박정희 대통령 서거 이후 45년 만에 선포된 123 비상계엄. 꽃가루를 날리기 싫은 조이 동태눈깔 팬싸 shorts. 3 직접 했던거야 6 5 npdlrqje 2025. lilijnex

meriol chan fansly porn 영통 중국집 중 요리 잘하는 곳 찾는다면 칭차이 경기 수원시 영통구 매영로 390 1층 매일 1121시 1517. 구 의 명칭은 당연히 영통동에서 따왔다. 2008년 제18대 국회의원 선거 에서 한나라당 후보로 경기도 고양시 덕양구 갑 선거구 에 출마하여 현역 비례대표 국회의원 인 진보신당 심상정 후보를 꺾고 당선되었다. 2008년 제18대 국회의원 선거 에서 한나라당 후보로 경기도 고양시 덕양구 갑 선거구 에 출마하여 현역 비례대표 국회의원 인 진보신당 심상정 후보를 꺾고 당선되었다. 5 2019년 4월 15일 태장동을 망포1동망포2동으로 분동. maxim pixiv

mfcamhub 지번주소 경기도 수원시 영통구 망포동 669. 영통구청 근처에 위치한 소담골은 들깨수제비와 들깨 감자옹심이가 특히 유명한 곳입니다. 꽃가루를 날리기 싫은 조이 동태눈깔 팬싸 shorts. 20 토 영업시간 1200 0000 양꼬치15,000원, 샤브샤브,훠궈60,000원, 고추건두부볶음16,000원, 마파두부13,000원, 양갈비살. 2017년 12월 26일 행정동 태장동이 관할하던 법정동 신동 전역과 망포동 일부 덕영대로 북쪽가 영통2동에 편입되고, 기존 영통2동과 영통1동의 각 일부가 분리돼 영통3동이 신설됐다. mib 채아 영상

little_le_nni onlyfans 일반 omegle 랜덤영통 해본사람있냐. 소추 펠라해주는년 dd69 179 0 한국야동 02. 영통 중국집 중 요리 잘하는 곳 찾는다면 칭차이 경기 수원시 영통구 매영로 390 1층 매일 1121시 1517. 싶을 정도로 퀄리티 높은 안주가 나와 같이간 친구와 함께 물개박수 치며 먹었던 곳이에요. 댓글 1 suwon 431개의 글 목록열기.

live fc2 2025년, 현지인들이 강력 추천하는 영통 맛집 베스트 10곳을 엄선하여 소개할게요. 3 직접 했던거야 6 5 npdlrqje 2025. 꽃가루를 날리기 싫은 조이 동태눈깔 팬싸 shorts. 사운드웨이브 위드드라마 코팬글로벌 케이타운유 애플뮤직 이렇게 총 4곳에서 해봤는데. 꽃가루를 날리기 싫은 조이 동태눈깔 팬싸 shorts.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.