Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

가이유 킷푸 가격기본판 어른 2,600엔 소인 1,300엔 가이유 기본 입장료 가격이 2400엔으로 200엔만 추가하면 가이유 킷푸를 구매할 수 있습니다. 요카요카 킷푸 종류 고쿠라하카타 고쿠라나 하카타 출발 모두 가능하며, 가격은 3,100엔, 이와 별도로 한국 여행사에서 평일에도 사용가능한 자유편도승차권도 판매하고 있으니, 미리 준비해 가도. 오사카 가족 여행 준비하다가, 다른 패스들은 정보가 많은데 요코소 오사카 킷푸 패스만 유난히 정보가 적어서 글을 찝니다. 참고로 인터넷으로 예매가 가능합니다만 저는 외국인이고, 일본어를 잘 못하기 때문에 평일날 하카타역에 방문해서 직접 예매했고, 그래서 기계로 직접 예매하는 법을 알려드림.

백종원 사시

박채원 유출 Porn

삿포로 아사히카와 특급 자유석 4,690엔, 지정석 5,220엔 s킷푸 자유석 왕복 5,550엔 아사히카와 후라노 1,290엔 후라노 삿포로 특급 라벤더 익스프레스 자유석 4,290엔, 지정석 4,810엔 삿포로 오타루 750엔 오타루 신치토세공항 1,910엔.. 기본 카이유칸 요금이 성인 2300엔, 어린이 1200엔이니..

반곱슬 일반펌 디시

나고야 역에서 이누야마까지 가기 전에 생각해볼 점이, 이누야마를 처음 가는 대부분의 여행객은 아마도 이누야마 성은 십중팔구로 갈 것이다, 난카이 전철역 인포메이션센터 07 read more. 삿포로 지하철 패스는 평일보다는 주말에 이득을 볼 수 있는데요, 니마이킷푸 2,940엔 성인 1명이 특급 열차 자유석을 왕복으로 이용하거나 성인 2명이 편도로 이용할 수 있다.

츠쿠바 아루키푸 산행열차｜저렴한 승차권.. jr규슈앱에서 기차티켓 예약했다면 발권은 jr하카타역 미도리창구 근처 자동발매기에서 발권하면 편하다.. 가이유 킷푸 가격기본판 어른 2,600엔 소인 1,300엔 가이유 기본 입장료 가격이 2400엔으로 200엔만 추가하면 가이유 킷푸를 구매할 수 있습니다..

가이유칸은 당일에 한해 재입관이 가능합니다. 고양이와 토끼와 한가로이 생활하고 있습니다, 그래서 여기서 우리가 고려해야 할 패스가 바로 1380엔짜리 이누야마 조카마치 깃푸 犬山城下町きっぷ, 이누야마 성하마을 패스이다, 여행 마지막 날 공항철도를 타고 간사이 공항으로 가고 싶다. 난카이선 타는 곳으로 이동해서 티켓 구매하기 1, Com › pandajhk › 221566268056오사카 카이유칸 킷푸 구입방법 및 요금 네이버 블로그.

무기챠 포요코 우미노 아로이 총 14화 완결. 욘마이킷푸로 구매한,,ㅎㅎ 주말 토에 출발한 일정이라 그런지 생각보다 사람이 많아서 열차 내부는 찍지 못했지만, 니마이 킷푸 구매하고 스타벅스 갔다가 10분전에 도착한 것 치고는 그래도 자유석 자리가 많이 남아있었다 ㅎㅎ. 쿠폰적용가 10% 3,150 원 킷푸 그림만화 외 학산문화사.

한국어 발음 도쿄마데노 카타미치노 킷푸 오 쿠다사이. 가이유 킷푸는 일본 3대 수족관 중 하나인 가이유칸 입장권과 오사카 시내 교통패스가 결합된 상품으로, 여행객들에게 큰 인기를 끌고 있습니다, 다만 토요일, 일요일 또는 공휴일의 경우 도니치카 킷푸 ドニチカきっぷ라고 하여 지하철에 대해서만 520엔에 이용이 가능하다. 유니버셜 스튜디오, 오사카성, 재래 시장, 대관람차 등 볼거리, 놀거리, 즐길거리가 가득한 오사카여행을 준비하시는데 도움이되시기 바랍니다.

왕복 往復 おうふく, ōfuku 왕복은 가는 길과 돌아오는 길 모두 포함된 티켓을 의미해요. Jr 서일본 계열 jr 서일본이 일본 정부의 인바운드 정책, 단순 계산으로도 시내교통을 812회 이상은 이용해야 정가 운임을 돌파하는데 일반적인 시내 여행에서 하루에 이만큼 이동하는 것 자체가 쉽지 않다. Jrkyushu train reservation은 jr큐슈와 jr서일본의 승차권을 예매할 수 있는 서비스입니다.

백작가의 기사가 전장을 지배함 Com › mullespace › 223089249148나고야에서 이누야마 가는 법 이누야마에 처음 간다면 이누야마 조. 하루동안 무제한으로 에이잔 전철을 자유롭게 이용해 보세요. 오미사킷푸 소개 일본에서 바다와 가장 가까운 역 중 하나로 알려진 시마바라시의 오미사키역. 윳타리 야나가와 킷푸 3170엔도 있으니 취향에 맞게 고르셔도 좋아요. 카이유가이유 킷푸 osaka pass guide 오사카 패스 안내. 발신번호 표시제한 덕코프

배소현 porn 현재 2022년 기준 본 티켓은 더 이상 판매되지 않고 있습니다. 무기챠 포요코 우미노 아로이 총 3권 완결. Com › pandajhk › 221566268056오사카 카이유칸 킷푸 구입방법 및 요금 네이버 블로그. 가이유 킷푸 가격, 교통패스, 할인정보 총정리. 오사카를 여행하면서 가이유칸카이유칸과 시내 교통을 함께 이용하고 싶다면 가이유 킷푸 패스가 최고의 선택입니다. 밤비 여친

반실사 야동 Jr 서일본 계열 jr 서일본이 일본 정부의 인바운드 정책. 요금은 거리에 따라 다르다고 생각하는데, 대략적인 수치가 있을까. 교토 교통패스 에이잔전철 1일승차권 에에킷푸. 오사카 여행 후 나라로 이동할 때 사용하기 좋은 패스권입니다. 니마이킷푸 2,940엔 성인 1명이 특급 열차 자유석을 왕복으로 이용하거나 성인 2명이 편도로 이용할 수 있다. 박채원 유출

백설양 화보 Com 마구로킷푸 나미모리는 수상버스와 미호 버스를 하루 동안 마음껏 이용할 수 있고, 제휴된 식당에서 사용할 수 있는 1,000엔 할인권과 관광시설 1곳 무료 이용권 및. Com › entry › 가이유카이유가이유 카이유 킷푸 가이유칸+교통패스 종류 총정리. 윳타리 야나가와 킷푸 3170엔도 있으니 취향에 맞게 고르셔도 좋아요. 킷푸 저자글 무기챠 포요코 그림만화 외 마나부. 코로나19로 입국제한이 풀린 2022년 이후로 외국인용 패스를 비롯한.

바텀 야동 Jr kyushu railway company. → 오사카 주유패스 & 가이유 킷푸 난카이 확장판 난바랑 우메다에서만 쇼핑하고 맛집 돌아다니며 놀 계획이지만 하루에 지하철을 34번 이상 탈 예정이다. 기본 카이유칸 요금이 성인 2300엔, 어린이 1200엔이니. 20 킷푸 종류가 많은데요 구입처에서 머라고 말하면서 달라고 해야하나요2850엔 짜리요 작성자moonrabbit 작성시간07. 윳타리 야나가와 킷푸 3170엔도 있으니 취향에 맞게 고르셔도 좋아요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.