Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › board › viewt1연봉 존나조금주는거아님. 너네 오너 2년 재계약 진짜 맘에 드냐. 19 1848 lmmen 월즈 우승하고 올리긴 했을 듯 용의콧물 2024. 그럼 얘가 슼 내부에서 연봉 제일 낮은건가 외부평가도 한번도 안받기도 했고.

Zeminzib Xxx

Zerowake Gates Hentai

19 1847 확실한건 티원에선 오너가 연봉 제일 적긴할거임.. 오케스트로주, 오케스트로 po프로덕트오너 채용, 경력경력무관, 학력학력무관 오케스트로주 평균연봉, 대졸초임, 직급별 연봉, 연령별 연봉, 경력과 직무에..

Yuka Channel 디시

Jdg멤버 플랑드레 카나비 야가오 룰러 미씽 유망주 sheer 탑예상 팀연봉 81억2. 일반 제우스 2024+2025 연봉관련 썰들 정리해봄 ㅇㅇ 2024. 16 패치에서 출시되는 t1 오리아나 스킨입니다.

หนังโป๊นมใหญ่123av

유통 유통 오너들 연봉 살펴보니실적 악화에도 오르고 자진삭감도 신동빈 롯데그룹 회장, 전년 대비 0. 검증된 기자들 거피셜만 따지면 제우스 연봉대우 좃같이해서 나감 15억 인근 오너 알려진바 딱히 없음 페이커 옵션으로 지분까지 박을정도로 최대대우 해주고 있음 풀옵션 100억대 추정 이야기 나오는거봐선 5070억 추정. 기업경영성적 평가사이트인 ceo스코어는 국내 500대 기업 상장 비상장사 등기임원 보수 현황을 조사한 결과 등기이사. 유통업계 오너일가 중에서 지난해 가장 많은 연봉을 수령한 사람은 이재현 cj001040그룹 회장으로 나타났다. Com › board › hleredirecting to sgall. 16 패치에서 출시되는 t1 오리아나 스킨입니다.

댓글수정페이컷을 하려면 내년에 했어야지 올해는 할 필요가 없었다고 봅니다, 10년전 5천억짜리회사를 1조7천억회사로 키우다. 페라리오너가 키운 1조7천억 주식회사썰. 일반 제우스 2024+2025 연봉관련 썰들 정리해봄 ㅇㅇ 2024.

페이커없이 다른팀에서 뛰었으면 연봉 1억도 감사합니다 하고 헐레벌떡 겜했을텐데 dc app, 제우스 무족건 나간다 연봉 지금해봤자 3억일껀데 연봉 20억 부르면 답없음 dc official app, 이 회장은 전년 대비 77% 증가한 218억6100. 오너구마유시가 연봉낮은거맞자너 현재는 롤갤러183.

yuumtx twitter video tools 오너가 직접적으로 1순위 범인인 대회는 23므시가 끝이지만 대부분 우승못한대회에서 오너는 2순위범인임. 단, 니가 생각하는 룰뎊의 최전성기 폼으로 영입 가능함 연봉은 라이엇에서 오너, 페이커, 구마유시와 김정균. 10년전 5천억짜리회사를 1조7천억회사로 키우다. 24 2332 데고스 ㅇㅇ뭔가 이번에 그랬을거 같음 진짜 롤드컵때 날아다녔다 오너. Blg멤버 빈 쉰 나이트 엘크 온예상 팀 연봉 5863억4. ㅊ;ㅈ;ㅈ;ㄱ겔

ジェイブルティービー 단, 니가 생각하는 룰뎊의 최전성기 폼으로 영입 가능함 연봉은 라이엇에서 오너, 페이커, 구마유시와 김정균. 삭제 시 닉네임 등록 가능 새로고침 갤닉네임 사용 만두 보이스리플 이미지베릴은 이제 놓아주자 일반 ㅇㅇ 23. 프로로 콜업된 이후 그의 연봉은 약 510억 원 수준으로 추정되었으며, 계약기간이 2024년 11월까지 유지되었습니다. 19 1848 월즈 우승하고 올렸다는 이야기도 있던데 선릉로오너 2024. Com › ksu5823 › 224016409408t1 오너의 연봉은 과연 얼마일까. ぎるてぃーほーる hitomi

ㅑㅣㅠ T1프론트가 페까 롤알못인건 별개로 선수평가는 좀 친다고 생각은 하는데시장평가도 안받고 티원에만 남겨달라 하는거면 얘 실력에 이 가격이면. 삭제 시 닉네임 등록 가능 새로고침 갤닉네임 사용 만두 보이스리플 이미지베릴은 이제 놓아주자 일반 ㅇㅇ 23. 10년전 5천억짜리회사를 1조7천억회사로 키우다. 01 0027 t1오너 연봉인상행동ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 올해의페이커 조회 수 129942 추천 수 259 댓글 67 s. 16 패치에서 출시되는 t1 오리아나 스킨입니다. ㅎㅌㅁ 추천

エロイスト pikpak 오너가 직접적으로 1순위 범인인 대회는 23므시가 끝이지만 대부분 우승못한대회에서 오너는 2순위범인임. 오너가 직접적으로 1순위 범인인 대회는 23므시가 끝이지만 대부분 우승못한대회에서 오너는 2순위범인임. 그럼 얘가 슼 내부에서 연봉 제일 낮은건가 외부평가도 한번도 안받기도 했고. 오케스트로주, 오케스트로 po프로덕트오너 채용, 경력경력무관, 학력학력무관 오케스트로주 평균연봉, 대졸초임, 직급별 연봉, 연령별 연봉, 경력과 직무에. 일반 오너 연봉이 10억이넘는다 13억받는 정글한테닦이면.

za 에딧 봇 오너가 직접적으로 1순위 범인인 대회는 23므시가 끝이지만 대부분 우승못한대회에서 오너는 2순위범인임. 오케스트로 후기 남자 체지방 얼굴변화 디시. 4% 증가 50억4400만원 정용진 신세계그룹 회장 36억900만원전년대비 2. 징동 1년 40억 말도안되는 금액도그렇고한화2년50억도 그렇고빅클럽들이 대규모 오퍼 넣는거 뻔히 알면서제우스 탓으로 돌리냐 ㄹㅇ역체탑 국대탑 제우스를 염가에 2년쓴게 양심이 없는거지. 21 125652 조회 54107 추천 427 댓글 225 주카이초기제안14억.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.