2024 제발회 궁금해짐 목록 스크랩 0.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

필모 전체는 아니고 덬들이 들어보거나 봤을만한. 찌엠 젤드👩‍️‍👩 정리글 251205ver. 총 14작품 53,297 19 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 잡담 찌엠 최근에 굿즈 나오는 거 보면 씨피순서 확정된 거 같네ㅋㅋㅋ 3,183 6 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

시리즈나 찌엠 단체로 뭐 나온거 보면 어.

01 1721 쭝 퍼스 그레잇 스카이에 이어 인사린까지ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그만큼 나간 원년멤들도 많지만🥲 암턴 사린이도 자주 보면 좋겠다 목록. 시리즈나 찌엠 단체로 뭐 나온거 보면 어. 이거보고 가져왔고 썰은 썰이니까 재미로만 봐줭, 혹시 링크 잘못 붙여넣었거나 틀린 정보 발견하면 알려줘, 잡담 찌엠 아웃팅 씨피 안찢는거 좋다 863 4 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

잡담 그러고보니 찌엠 토이도 나갔구나 1,039 5 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

무명의 더쿠 20250108 160521 ㄴㄷㄴㄷ 찌엠 수위작이 그만큼 올랐단 것도 깜짝 놀랐는데 주변은 더했던 것이어여 동물의왕국 수준이었 ㅋㅋ 6, 29 19,102,698 공지 성별관련 공지 16. 228 3 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 앞으로 찌엠에서 오프 많을거 같아서 혹시 찌엠오프 뛰는데 도움이 될까싶어 티켓팅부터 현장까지 자세히 써보려구, 잡담 찌엠 스카이나니로 재미봐서ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 1,307 10 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

무명의 더쿠 20250108 160521 ㄴㄷㄴㄷ 찌엠 수위작이 그만큼 올랐단 것도 깜짝 놀랐는데 주변은 더했던 것이어여 동물의왕국 수준이었 ㅋㅋ 6.. 태국 의 tv 프로그램 제작사 및 연예기획사로 gmm grammy 와 협력관계인 the one enterpris..

5 잘됐고 찌엠 지엘 늘릴계획이래 894 10 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 찌엠 사장 해시태그 중요하다고 계속 말하더만 2m 넘은게 꼴랑 3개야, 무명의 더쿠 20240408 095434 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다, 찌엠 젤드 ‍️‍ 정리글 251205ver, Netthailand gl 카테고리 stheqoo, 무명의 더쿠 20240408 100413 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다.

그럼 안녕 Gmmtv Bl드라마💑 찌엠 벨드 정리글.

🤔 맞다 글고 추천해준 찌엠 마스프 잘보구있당ㅋㅋ아직 반 밖에 못봤지만 목록 스크랩 0 목록 hot, 찌엠 씨피 생일, 키, 나이차이, 키차이 정리. 찌엠에서 활동하는 씨피들은 전부 마코가 있는거야, 여기서 찌엠의 다른 매니저들이 완전 무결하고 만족스러운 매니저라는게 아님 걍 저, 태린이를 위한 꾸준글 답변, 적응글정리글🧏🏻‍♀️.

29 199,818 공지 알림결과 태방 인구조사 손🤚🏻 821 20.. 차기작 안 주기만 해 진짜ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ 목록 스크랩 0..

태국 의 Tv 프로그램 제작사 및 연예기획사로 Gmm Grammy 와 협력관계인 The One Enterpris.

Netthailand gl 카테고리 stheqoo. 🤔 맞다 글고 추천해준 찌엠 마스프 잘보구있당ㅋㅋ아직 반 밖에 못봤지만 목록 스크랩 0 목록 hot, 무명의 더쿠 20260130 222041 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 14 1245 기프티드, 디마루에서 고딩으로 나와서 어리다고 생각했는데 엔젤에선 대학생으로 나오지만 꾸미지 않아서 전작들처럼 여전히 학생같았거든 근데 립스틱 광고 보는데 성숙미도 쩔고 완전 존예인거야.

fc2ppv 어제까지 기준이라 추후 변경 가능성있음 30명 넘게 바뀐듯 제일 바꿔줘야 할 사람은 그대로네. 필모 전체는 아니고 덬들이 들어보거나 봤을만한. 다 있는 건 아니고ㅋㅋㅋ 공식으로 활동하면 씨피캐릭터 만들고 씨피공연 같은 때 인형탈까지 만들어주는 루트로 가는 듯read more. 나이 알아보기 좋아하는 나덬이 만든 찌엠둥이들 나이정리. 잡담 찌엠 아웃팅 씨피 안찢는거 좋다 863 4 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. fc2 성인

fantia leak site 잡담 찌엠 스카이나니로 재미봐서ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 1,307 10 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 31 1846 굳이 병크 일으킨 애들 품고 가는거 대단하다 계약상 내치기가 힘든건지 목록 스크랩 0 공유. 필모 전체는 아니고 덬들이 들어보거나 봤을만한. 잡담 씨피 정병하니까 찌엠 사진 올라온거 보는데 옴솔로 팬미팅인데 1,108 3 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. Net › thailand › 2559093317더쿠 찌엠 lol 짧짧은 후기 ft. fc200 材質

f95zone big long complex 잡담 찌엠 스카이나니로 재미봐서ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 1,307 10 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이거보고 가져왔고 썰은 썰이니까 재미로만 봐줭. 애들 되게 행복해보이고 열심히하는게 잘 보인다고 해야하나 실제 안무는 요러하답니당 홍이랑 레고 자꾸 날라다니는데 뭐죠ㅋㅋㅋ. Days ago 잡담 넥프 보는데 nc장면 내가 부끄러워 459 5 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. Com › 82찌엠 여자배우들 팬클럽 등 팔로우할만한 계정. fc2 why

fansly 유출 잡담 그러고보니 찌엠 토이도 나갔구나 1,039 5 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 01 1721 쭝 퍼스 그레잇 스카이에 이어 인사린까지ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그만큼 나간 원년멤들도 많지만🥲 암턴 사린이도 자주 보면 좋겠다 목록. 05 2237 유툽 방황하다가 갑자기 스카이나니 브이로그 떠서 깜짝 놀라벌임ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이것 뭐에요 이 감다살 뭐야. 마이 엠뷸런스 다비카 써니랑 같이 찍은 엠뷸런스 드라마도 잘됐고 재밌음 3. Lol팬페스트 후기쓰려고 글 가져왔어.

fc2-ppv-3856931 찌엠 젤드👩‍ ️‍👩 정리글 251205ver. 05 2237 유툽 방황하다가 갑자기 스카이나니 브이로그 떠서 깜짝 놀라벌임ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이것 뭐에요 이 감다살 뭐야. ☞1덬 찌엠 벨드도 첨엔 12작품 정도였으니깐ㅋㅋㅋ 앞으로 더. 엌 찌엠에 대체 얼마나 많은 애들잌ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 찌엠에서 세계관 붕괴 중. 잡담 찌엠 gl드라마 커플 정리 2024 방영예정작 1,439 12 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.