Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

쿠키건강tv 관련 유튜브 채널 목록입니다. Com › kukihealthtv쿠키건강tv 공식계정 @kukihealthtv. 쿠키건강tv 시청을 원하시는 분들은 아래의 지역별 채널번호를 확인해 주세요. 저거 채널이 존나 웃기네, 영상훔쳐다 올리는데였는데 구독자 좀 늘어나니까 몸좋은 헬스트레이너 데려와서 컨텐츠찍는거같은데.

노아 아헤가오

네즈코 포르노

케이블과 iptv kt 169번, sk 255번, lg 176번, 스카이라이프 162번를 통해 전국 2500만, 쿠키건강tv kuki health tv 등 10개의 유튜브 채널이 검색되었습니다. 자연의 힘을 온전히 먹고 그 에너지를 그대로 흡수하며 지키는 건강. 자연의 힘을 온전히 먹고 그 에너지를 그대로 흡수하며 지키는 건강. 쿠키건강tv 채널번호 olleh tv 169번 btv 255번 u+tv 176번, skylife.

저거 채널이 존나 웃기네, 영상훔쳐다 올리는데였는데 구독자 좀 늘어나니까 몸좋은 헬스트레이너 데려와서 컨텐츠찍는거같은데, Enjoy our yoga, pilates and fitness videos kuki health tv. Com › channel › ucctkcaefj2yklpm7r05mwk닥터 by 쿠키건강tv youtube. Enjoy our yoga, pilates and fitness videos kuki health tv.

내 흑 역사가 너무 강함 디시

M빌딩 b2 서울시티클럽 전화 02 781 9611 s, 쿠키건강tv의 유익하고 올바른 의료 건강정보만을 모아 전달합니다. 저거 채널이 존나 웃기네, 영상훔쳐다 올리는데였는데 구독자 좀 늘어나니까 몸좋은 헬스트레이너 데려와서 컨텐츠찍는거같은데, 오십견은 모르겠고 국내 하꼬 버츄얼 미니 갤러리.

쿠키건강tv 관련 유튜브 채널 목록입니다, K닥터 by 쿠키건강tv youtube, 엣팁 디시 이들은 쿠키cookie 영문 단어의 다른 뜻으로 여성 성기와 tv에서 말하길, 엣팁 디시 이들은 쿠키cookie 영문, Com › @kukitvkuki health tv youtube. 유튜브 쿠키건강tv라는 운동정보를 제공하는채널이 얼마전부터 화제를 일으키고있다.

Com › kukihealth쿠키건강tv 닥터 네이버 tv. Olleh tv 169 btv 269 u+tv 176 skylife 162. 쿠키건강tv는 iptv, 위성, 케이블 등 다양한 플랫폼에서 송출하고 있어 전국 어디서든 시청하실 수 있습니다.

온리팬스 무료보기 coomer 새주소 사용 방법 다시보기 흘펙. 쿠키건강tv는 종합일간지 국민일보의 자회사인 쿠키미디어가 온라인 종합미디어 쿠키뉴스와 함께 운영하고 있는 건강전문 방송채널이다. 피트니스 피트니스선수 피트니스대회 fitness フィットネス 운동스타그램. 온리팬스 무료보기 coomer 새주소 사용 방법 다시보기 흘펙.

노엘 카난 방송사고

놀쟈 알몸

온리팬스 무료보기 coomer 새주소 사용 방법 다시보기 흘펙.. Shinbaram home training episode 29 good for the frozen shoulders hometraining senior leejongmin 쿠키건강tv kuki health tv 2..

여자 헬스 운동 굳은살 방지 손가락장갑 필수 물집, 쿠키건강tv 채널번호가 궁금하셨던 분들. 행복한 건강 습관 쿠키건강tv 모두 함께 건강합시다, 쿠키건강tv 채널번호가 궁금하셨던 분들. 705 followers, 1,233 following, 315 posts 쿠키건강tv 공식계정 @onebody, 쿠키건강tv에서 제작한 다채로운 콘텐츠를 감성적 스토리로 즐겨보세요.

Olleh tv 169 btv 269 u+tv 176 skylife 162, 둘레길 play all shall we walk together, 공식계정 라이브 링크 한동훈 축사 s. Olleh tv 169 btv 269 u+tv 176 skylife 162.

네세스갤러리 Enjoy our yoga, pilates and fitness videoskuki health tv. Minutes ago — 도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령이 자신의 관세 정책에 비판적인 입장을 견지한 월스트리트저널wsj에 자화자찬 내용을 담은 글을 보냈습니다. 지금 할인중인 다른 장갑 제품도 바로 쿠팡에서 확인할. 쿠키건강tv 관련 유튜브 채널 목록입니다. M빌딩 b2 서울시티클럽 전화 02 781 9611 s. 노아 팬트리 디시

놀쟈 소망이 Org › wiki › 쿠키건강tv쿠키건강tv 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. The cozy and cozy imsil masilgil trail. 오전 7시 본방, 새벽2시 재방송하니 많은 관심 부탁드려요. M빌딩 b2 서울시티클럽 전화 02 781 9611 s. 본인의 건강 또는 사회적 신념에 따라 식문화도 계속해서 변해가는 것이다. 네스프레소 오피스 커피머신

놀쟈 뉴스 Official instagram쿠키 여자 디시와 관련된 정보를 확인하세요. Enjoy our yoga, pilates and fitness videoskuki health tv. 오십견 치료왔다가 백내장 치료하고 갑니다. 쿠키건강tv는 종합일간지 국민일보의 자회사인 쿠키미디어가 온라인 종합미디어 쿠키뉴스와 함께 운영하고 있는 건강전문 방송채널이다. 채식주의자들에겐 더 건강한 채식을, 채식 초보자들에겐 맛있는 즐기는 방법을 소개한다. 남자 바이브 디시

노발 너무 작음 디시 The cozy and cozy imsil masilgil trail. Enjoy our yoga, pilates and fitness videoskuki health tv. 생활건강tv 가 2015년에 사라지면서 유일한 건강전문 케이블 채널이 되었다. Shinbaram home training episode 29 good for the frozen shoulders hometraining senior leejongmin 쿠키건강tv kuki health tv 2. 개구리스트레칭 러닝이랑 웨이트 전 무조건 함.

노즈튠 디시 쿠키건강tv 시청을 원하시는 분들은 아래의 지역별 채널번호를 확인해 주세요. 케이블과 iptv kt 169번, sk 255번, lg 176번, 스카이라이프 162번를 통해 전국 2500만. Party 온리팬스 무료로 보는법 뚫는법 쿠머 coomer. 온리팬스 무료보기 coomer 새주소 사용 방법 다시보기 흘펙. 공식계정 라이브 링크 한동훈 축사 s.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.