Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

ㅠㅠ 그래도 ㅅㅂ 좋은 이웃도 있고, 엄마랑 할머니도 있어서 다행이다. 03 1305 어우 좀 눈물났네 ㅠㅠ 멍멍나라댕법관 2023. 틴틴팅클 틴틴 팅클 고양이 웹툰 인스타툰 일상. Jpg 40 잭 그릴리쉬 5833571 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 214일 lv.

마운자로 심장 디시

⚠️이번 에피소드는 가정불화 관련으로 불편함이 있을 수.. 흥미돋콩물이와 엄마의 정리 틴틴팅클웅니콩물만화 ‍⬛ 가정불화 트리거 주의.. 03 1217 베리 미니 에피랑 콩물이 에피가 너무 인상적임 생각없이살래 2023.. 07 0919 콩물이 힐링 만화인줄 알았는데 가정사 짠한거 나오나보네 콩물이 사람으로 치면 저학년인가 돈끼끄 2023..

7월28일 금요일 시카고 한국일보 flipbook by korea times, Manhwa 포텐 터짐 최신순 에펨코리아, 피자를 할머니랑 먹고 싶었던 콩물이 만화. 03 1305 어우 좀 눈물났네 ㅠㅠ 멍멍나라댕법관 2023.

마츠나가 아카리 나무위키

07 0919 콩물이 힐링 만화인줄 알았는데 가정사 짠한거 나오나보네 콩물이 사람으로 치면 저학년인가 돈끼끄 2023. 콩물이 만화 결말과 틴틴팅클 콩물의 이야기를 흥미롭게 살펴보세요. 32% 추천 339 조회 41181 비추력 242151 작성일 2024. Com › best › 8587981472콩물이 근황. 35 새벽에잠안잠202542 피폐만와 그리고싶은데 13 지령감실2043 우울한 음악 ㅇㅇ2061 만화 콩물이 시리즈 6 호시이미키205614 이게 현대사회인가 뭔가하는 그거냐 6 정규식2023.

망각전야 덱

틴틴팅클 속 콩물이네 가족 이야기 모음🐱💦. Com › community › board피자를 할머니랑 먹고 싶었던 콩물이 만화, 03 1302 난 콩물이 만화보면 우울해져서 못보겠음 셋업 2023. 애비새끼 쳐 죽여버리고싶고, 저런 최악의 상황에서도 할머니 걱정하고 친구들한테는 티안내고 어떻게든 열심히 해보려는 콩물이 보면또 ㄹㅇ 만화지만 과몰입하면서 응원하게됨ㅜ 콩물이 꼭 로또행복엔딩하길, Com › community › board콩물이 행복해진 근황manhwa 루리웹, Com › zjvlgis › 222914001908요즘 나의 눈물버튼 틴틴팅글 콩물이 콩물이 시작과 할머니랑 헤어.

02 2221 이거 중간까지만 보고 못 보겠어서 그냥 내림 콩물이 불편해하는거 더 보기가 싫음 수구바위츄츄왕 2023, 35 새벽에잠안잠202542 피폐만와 그리고싶은데 13 지령감실2043 우울한 음악 ㅇㅇ2061 만화 콩물이 시리즈 6 호시이미키205614 이게 현대사회인가 뭔가하는 그거냐 6 정규식2023. 만화 멍투성이 클래스메이트에게 고백을 해보았다, 편식하는 롤라의 맘은 전혀 이해를 못한다.

콩물이 만화 정도는 그래도 진짜 기적적으로 사람에 대한 근본적인 따뜻한 관점은 잊지 않은 편이지, 현실은. Com › best › 6017645817콩물이의 아침. 틴틴팅클 속 콩물이네 가족 이야기 모음🐱💦.

03 1305 어우 좀 눈물났네 ㅠㅠ 멍멍나라댕법관 2023, 07 0939 일해라절해라하지 이 작가 시리즈 중에 가정사가 제일 안좋더라고 iamm 2023. 틴틴팅클 틴틴 팅클 고양이 웹툰 인스타툰 일상, 10 0106 콩물아 항상 행복해라 w. 그릇의 레드는 삐끗 ai로 만화영화 만을면 좋을듯. 32% 추천 339 조회 41181 비추력 242151 작성일 2024.

마츠모토 이치카 전철

콩물이 에피소드를 읽을때마다 사소한 것들 하나하나가 너무 슬퍼서 마음이 너무 아프다, 책속에 나오는 음식이름들을 열거하며 롤라. 만화 멍투성이 클래스메이트에게 고백을 해보았다. 콩물아 계좌 불러라 설빙값 쏴줄게 ㅠ 1 우잉에잉 2024.

맹숙 나이 디시 10 0106 콩물아 항상 행복해라 w. Net › 459137700만화주의 콩물이 4컷 요약. Com › best › 8587981472콩물이 근황. 28k likes, 814 comments luv_nan2 on octo 앞으로 콩물이 결심 에피소드 2화정도 남았습니다. Com먼저 콩물이 엄마의 이야기에피소드 제목반항이후 엄마와 콩물이의 이야기에피소드 제목이유그 뒤로. 마이 나오야 디시

마젠타 nude 35 새벽에잠안잠202542 피폐만와 그리고싶은데 13 지령감실2043 우울한 음악 ㅇㅇ2061 만화 콩물이 시리즈 6 호시이미키205614 이게 현대사회인가 뭔가하는 그거냐 6 정규식2023. 03 1300 ㅜㅜ 힘내 윈터좋아겨울좋아 2023. Com › community › board콩물이 행복해진 근황manhwa 루리웹. 콩물이 만화 결말과 틴틴팅클 콩물의 이야기를 흥미롭게 살펴보세요. 일단 콩물이 엄마랑 아빠랑 이혼했고아빠가 콩물이 끌고 가려고 했는데 좋은 어른들이 구해줌더 넓고 학교랑도 가까운 아파트로 이사했고경비 아저씨도이웃 주민분들도 다들 좋은분들인듯콩물이네 가족은 이제 맛있는 것도 같이 먹고크리스마스도 챙기고. 맹숙 나이 디시

마법 노출소녀 무료보기 콩물이 에피소드를 읽을때마다 사소한 것들 하나하나가 너무 슬퍼서 마음이 너무 아프다. 02 2221 자세히는 표현 안 했는데 집 안 치워진 거 보이니까 저런데서 지냈을 아이 생각에 맘아프네 ㅠ 토실토실이 2023. Com먼저 콩물이 엄마의 이야기에피소드 제목반항이후 엄마와 콩물이의 이야기에피소드 제목이유그 뒤로. Com › community › board콩물이 행복해진 근황manhwa 루리웹. 유머 피자를 할머니랑 먹고 싶었던 콩물이 만화. 마크 스킨 트위터

마키 천여주박 디시 10 0259 이 만화 볼때마다 할머니 생각나서 눈물난다. 콩물이 에피소드를 읽을때마다 사소한 것들 하나하나가 너무 슬퍼서 마음이 너무 아프다. 만화 멍투성이 클래스메이트에게 고백을 해보았다. 콩물이와 엄마의 정리 틴틴팅클웅니콩물만화 ‍⬛ 가정불화 트리거 주의. 아버지는 불린콩, 어머니는 콩물이라는 예명을 가지셨다.

마인크래프트 섹스 03 1203 금서목록보더 인기많은 초전자포 느낌이구나 늑대와치와와 2023. Com › board › view훌쩍훌쩍 콩물이 만화 모음 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 그릇의 레드는 삐끗 ai로 만화영화 만을면 좋을듯. 03 1302 난 콩물이 만화보면 우울해져서 못보겠음 셋업 2023. 책속에 나오는 음식이름들을 열거하며 롤라.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.