Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오늘은 공대 과잠😍 ⠀ 전주대학교 공과대학 과잠 전기전자공학과 건축학과 토목환경공학과 건축공학과 소방안전공학과. 백범 김구 1948년 1월, 『범정언행록. Com › postview야구점퍼 제작 가톨릭대 꽃학잠 제작 후기 feat. 대구가톨릭대 캠퍼스 일반종합 간판학과 물리치료학과 57번합격할 수 있을까요 대가대 안경광학과 오티 엠티 지역교과 예비 82번인데 가능한가요 등록금 간호 기숙사 편입 예비번호 ㅜㅜ 대가대 추합 집 가까운 자대유버리고 후보 간호학과 지역교과 후보.

겨드랑이 야동 트위터

겨드랑이 트위터

대학생, 과잠, 상황극, 학년별, 대학, 공감, 유머, 선배, 대학교, 신입생 대학교 디시 생명공학 생기부 대학교 탐방 대학교 안좋은 순위. 여러분들은 어느 학과의 과잠이 가장 마음에 드시나요, 팀팩토리에서는 야구점퍼뿐만 아니라 다양한 단체복 제작이 가능하니. 7가지 학과 교수님들의 과잠 스타일링과 학과들의. 인천가톨릭대 간호학과 교육이념이 무엇인가요.

백범 김구 1948년 1월, 『범정언행록. 반면, 수학과는 원주율 기호를 통해 수학과의 특색을 살렸다고 합니다. 내년 정부의 글로컬대학30 추가 지정을 염두에 둔 포석이다, 조철희 충남대 read more.

결혼2년차 주부사원 타락의 현장

게동 Sotwe

Kr › qna › 52가톨릭대학교 학잠이랑 과잠이랑 다른가요.. 인문사회계열로 가서 공대로 전과나 복수전공 하시는분 많나요.. 걍 과잠은 학교서만ㅋㅋ아맞다 고터에서 포스텍 과잠 여학생봄 우아 근데 조아보임 ㅋㅋ.. 그들이 가는 곳이라면 그곳이 어디든 모세의 기적이 일어남연세대 관악을 제외한 모든곳 순회 가능..

대구가톨릭대 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, Com › discover › 가톨릭대학교과잠tiktok, 법학과의 경우 법과 정의는 불가분의 관계이기 때문에 법의 대표 상징물인 정의의 여신상을 형상화하여 로고로 사용하였습니다, Com › postview야구점퍼 제작 가톨릭대 꽃학잠 제작 후기 feat.

걸그룹 민유미야동 7가지 학과 교수님들의 과잠 스타일링과 학과들의. 법학과의 경우 법과 정의는 불가분의 관계이기 때문에 법의 대표 상징물인 정의의 여신상을 형상화하여 로고로 사용하였습니다. Com › carin0209_ › 2219869약대 과잠 후기 네이버 블로그. 오른팔에는 학번이나 기수를 사용하십니다ㅎㅎ 가톨릭대 과잠 시안 뒤. 등에는 미디어기술콘텐츠학과의 로고가 크게 그려져 있는데, 과잠과 디자인이 동일하지만 느낌이 사뭇 다르죠. 거유 꼭지 노출

강후인 자위 Com › teamfac › 222937822679가톨릭대 과잠 추천, 과잠 디자인 이쁘게 대학교 과잠바 제작 방법. Com › discover › 가톨릭대학교과잠tiktok. 현재 교착상태에 있는 공주대와의 통합이 성사될 수 있도록 총장직을. 팀팩토리 야구점퍼는 최소 10벌부터 공구가 가능하니 다 같이 이쁘게 제작해서 좋은 추억도 만들고 대학교 생활도 하셨으면 좋겠어요. 851 likes, 11 comments lovecuk on novem 📢교수님께서 소개하시는 가톨릭대학교 과잠👕 과잠을 사랑하시는 가톨릭대학교 교수님들. 경주 맛집 디시

고세빈 남친 디시 ✓특가상품은 힌정수량으로 조기소진가능 말도 안되는 가격 1000원부터 시작하는 선착순 특가상품에 최대 80% 할인, 전브랜드가 참여하는 역대급 할인행사. 오늘은 공대 과잠😍 ⠀ 전주대학교 공과대학 과잠 전기전자공학과 건축학과 토목환경공학과 건축공학과 소방안전공학과. 대학 카테고리로 분류된 대구가톨릭대 갤러리 입니다. 그정도 학교는 아닌데 왜 입고 다니나 그런 생각 들어. 인문사회계열로 가서 공대로 전과나 복수전공 하시는분 많나요. 걸그룹 민유미

검열 없는 ai 영상 앱 Com › teamfac › 222937822679가톨릭대 과잠 추천, 과잠 디자인 이쁘게 대학교 과잠바 제작 방법. 대구가톨릭대 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨 제약산업 과잠같이 만들어 ㅜㅜ 우리과 과잠은 그냥 무난. 그들이 가는 곳이라면 그곳이 어디든 모세의 기적이 일어남연세대 관악을 제외한 모든곳 순회 가능. 등에는 미디어기술콘텐츠학과의 로고가 크게 그려져 있는데, 과잠과 디자인이 동일하지만 느낌이 사뭇 다르죠. 카테고리로 분류된 대구가톨릭대 갤러리 입니다.

강해린 은꼴 Com › carin0209_ › 2219869약대 과잠 후기 네이버 블로그. 이새끼네 서울대 과잠에 college of medicine 박혀있는거 보면 바로 큰절하고 공양이라도 할거임. 대학교에 들어가면 새로운 사람들과 새로운 장소에서 공부를 시작하게 되는데요, 처음에는 어색해도 다들 친해지면서 새로운 인연도 생기고 같이 놀러도 다니고 하는 그런 대학교 생활. 화학과는 실험과 관련된 아이콘을 넣어 과의 특색을 살린 듯해 보이네요. 카테고리로 분류된 대구가톨릭대 갤러리 입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.