김하성연봉, 김하성복귀, 김하성근황, 김하성템파베이, 김하성.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

김하성 이랑 결혼하려면 어떻게해야하나요 20230725 1411. 김하성 김하성프로필 김하성나이 김하성키 어썸킴 김하성fa mlb김하성 나혼자산다김하성 김하성일상 김하성집공개 메이저리그유격수 fa시장핫이슈 김하성어깨부상 김하성재활 트리플포지션 골드글러브 메이저리그입성 mlb적응기 김하성웨이버. 연관 갤러리 실시간 베스트 갤러리 타 갤러리 0 이 갤러리가 연관 갤러리로 추가한 갤러리. 11월 결혼♥ 윤정수, 못 알아볼 정도로 살 뺐다16kg 비포 애프터 공개 다음은 김하성 차례.

김하성 선수는 대한민국을 대표하는 야구 선수로, 현재 미국 메이저리그 Mlb 탬파베이 레이스에서 뛰고 있습니다.

11월 결혼♥ 윤정수, 못 알아볼 정도로 살 뺐다16kg 비포 애프터 공개 다음은 김하성 차례.

그는 훗날 강정호 의 빈 자리가 잘 느껴지지 않을만큼 활약하며, 그보다 먼저 지명을 받은 내야수들과 비교 대상이 됐다.. 보라스 고객들 알론소벨린저 이어 브레그먼도 fa 선언..

Com › board › view김하성은 왜 올스타전 못나가냐. 그제 깜짝 결혼 발표로 세간의 관심을 모은 다저스의 오타니 쇼헤이도 타격감을 이어갑니다. 이날 한국인 첫 골드 글러브상 수상자 샌디에이고 파드리스 소속 메이저리거 김하성이 출연했다.

이날 한국인 첫 골드 글러브상 수상자 샌디에이고 파드리스 소속 메이저리거 김하성이 출연했다. ‘유퀴즈’ 김하성이 유퀴즈에서 남다른 입담을 뽐냈다, 뛰어난 야구 dna를 한국 야구를 위해 2세를 야구를 하게해야 제2의 이정후 ㄱㄱ, 11월 결혼♥ 윤정수, 못 알아볼 정도로 살 뺐다16kg 비포 애프터 공개 다음은 김하성 차례, 김하성 선수는 대한민국을 대표하는 야구 선수로, 메이저리그에서 활약하며 많은 팬들의 관심을 받고 있습니다. 그는 훗날 강정호 의 빈 자리가 잘 느껴지지 않을만큼 활약하며, 그보다 먼저 지명을 받은 내야수들과 비교 대상이 됐다.

Com › mgallery › board김하성 ♡ 박지영 아나 12월 결혼행 mlb 마이너 갤러리. 이번 글에서는 김하성 선수의 연봉, 소속팀인 탬파베이 레이스, 최근 부상과 근황, 계약 상황, 결혼 여부, 고향, 부인, 그리고 통계에 대해 자세히 알아보겠습니다, 곽튜브가 돈에 미친 이유를 알거같다 조선시대 7살 여자애가 출산한 사건 오싹오싹 동네에 펜타닐 중독자로 의심되는 사람이 나타남 이와중에 메시 근황ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 이정후 여친이랑 김하성 여친이랑 서로 맞팔했노 키움.

곽튜브가 돈에 미친 이유를 알거같다 조선시대 7살 여자애가 출산한 사건 오싹오싹 동네에 펜타닐 중독자로 의심되는 사람이 나타남 이와중에 메시 근황ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

김하성 이랑 결혼하려면 어떻게해야하나요 20230725 1411. 뛰어난 야구 dna를 한국 야구를 위해 2세를 야구를 하게해야 제2의 이정후 ㄱㄱ. 이번 포스팅에서는 김하성 선수의 최신 프로필, 보면 알다시피 방금까지 하성이랑 카톡도 한 사이임, 김하성 이랑 결혼하려면 어떻게해야하나요.

t me 지인 공유 이정후랑 김하성이랑 결혼하면 키움 히어로즈 갤러리. 이정후 여친이랑 김하성 여친이랑 서로 맞팔했노 키움. 보면 알다시피 방금까지 하성이랑 카톡도 한 사이임. 그래서 오늘은 야구선수 김하성에 대해 알려진 정보를 모아 정리해 보았습니다. 그래서 오늘은 야구선수 김하성에 대해 알려진 정보를 모아 정리해 보았습니다. ssj4047 sotwe

tanihara nozomi 이정후 여친이랑 김하성 여친이랑 서로 맞팔했노 키움. ‘유퀴즈’ 김하성이 유퀴즈에서 남다른 입담을 뽐냈다. 보면 알다시피 방금까지 하성이랑 카톡도 한 사이임. 이 계약에는 1년 후 옵트아웃 계약 해지 조항이 포함되어 있어, 2025시즌 후 다시 fa가 될 가능성이 있습니다. 김하성 김하성프로필 김하성나이 김하성키 어썸킴 김하성fa mlb김하성 나혼자산다김하성 김하성일상 김하성집공개 메이저리그유격수 fa시장핫이슈 김하성어깨부상 김하성재활 트리플포지션 골드글러브 메이저리그입성 mlb적응기 김하성웨이버. thea leea nude

thumzilla.com 김하성은 올 시즌을 앞두고 탬파베이와 2년 2900만 달러 규모의 프리에이전트fa 계약을 체결했다. ‘유퀴즈’ 김하성이 유퀴즈에서 남다른 입담을 뽐냈다. 이날 한국인 첫 골드 글러브상 수상자 샌디에이고 파드리스 소속 메이저리거 김하성이 출연했다. 그잘신 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. Jpg 공포 의사가 말하는 한녀와의 결혼 후기 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 어버이날에 욕 ㅈㄴ 처먹었다. taboome telegram

terasu hitomi 뛰어난 수비력과 유틸리티 플레이어로서의 역량을 인정받아, 2023년에는 아시아 선수 최초로 유틸리티 부문 골드글러브를 수상했습니다. 넥센키움 히어로즈 20152025read more. 류현진도 배지현 아나운서랑 했고물론 김하성 노리는 여자연예들도 많겠지. 그래서 오늘은 야구선수 김하성에 대해 알려진 정보를 모아 정리해 보았습니다. 💬 김하성 ♡ 박지영 아나 12월 결혼행 ㅇㅇ118.

tui douga Jpg 공포 의사가 말하는 한녀와의 결혼 후기 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 어버이날에 욕 ㅈㄴ 처먹었다. 류현진도 배지현 아나운서랑 했고물론 김하성 노리는 여자연예들도 많겠지. Com › board › view김하성은 왜 올스타전 못나가냐. 이날 한국인 첫 골드 글러브상 수상자 샌디에이고 파드리스 소속 메이저리거 김하성이 출연했다. 그는 훗날 강정호 의 빈 자리가 잘 느껴지지 않을만큼 활약하며, 그보다 먼저 지명을 받은 내야수들과 비교 대상이 됐다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.