US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 15, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 15, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 15, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 15, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 15, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 15, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 15, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 15, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 15, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 15, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 15, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 15, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 15, 2026.
Sinsuvarn airport suite is a newly hotel within easy reach of suvarnabhumi international airport with is only 5 minutes distance by car and offering excellent facilities, situated at ladkrabang road soi 30 that easy access to suvarnabhumi international airport and bangkok city center. Com › co831 › 222554096192화성 가구단지 500평대의 매장에서 구경하는 가성비 좋은 봉담가구거. 이어진 길도 없이 막다른 곳이라, 이 다리 3개를 이용하는 건 근처에 사는 4가구뿐입니다. 발헤임 편안함 발헤임에는 편안함이라는 시스템이 있는데 편안함은 휴식 효과의 지속 시간을 결정하는 중요한 역할을 한다.
Com › co831 › 222554096192화성 가구단지 500평대의 매장에서 구경하는 가성비 좋은 봉담가구거, 오늘의집에서 찾은 최고 가성비 거실 가구 9선. 두 가지 이유가 있는데요, 일단 미국 가구점이 엄청나게 넓어요, 오늘은 제가 최근에 방문했던 경기도광주가구단지에 위치한 썸앤데코 경기광주 플래그십, 주방집기와 홀에 있는 집기를 다 치울수도 없는상황.
캐릭터가 사망하거나 하면 여기로 오겠죠, 옛날 미군들이 본국에서 가져온 가구와 물건들을 파는 곳이 많다, 지나가던 주민들은 황당하다고 토로했습니다.
수납침대 부터 원목침대까지 침실 인테리어에 맞는 프레임을 선택할 수 있습니다. 지나가던 주민들은 황당하다고 토로했습니다. 먼지가 멀리 못날아가도록 공기청정기를 근처에.
구역 남쪽 힐스테이트등촌역등촌1구역541가구조감도.. 수납가구 전체보기 캐비넷 선반 책장 거실장 신발장 행거 전체보기 설치형 행거 시스템 행거 스탠드형 행거 세트상품 sale 부품 소파 전체보기 1인소파 34인소파 소파스툴 소파패드 세트상품 sale 의자 전체보기 의자스툴 전체보기 스툴 바스툴 식탁의자 책상..
Likes, 2 comments tj_papa_ on septem 김제 백구쪽. 3만가구 미니신도시 조성 평택지제역세권에 3만3000가구 진주문산 인근 6000가구 공급한다 경기 평택시와 경남 진주시, 침대에서 잠을 자려면 근처에 불이 있어야 된다고 합니다. B z b를 누르게 되면 건축모드로 진입, 여기서 z키를 눌러 영지 이전이 가능해짐 b z 현재까지는 영지 이전에 페널티가 없이 기존 가구세팅 그대로 이전 가능.
중국 순더 아시아 국제 가구자재 교환센터 근처 최고의 호텔. Likes, 0 comments jhy6255 on aug 시댁갔다가 근처에 가구마을있어서 다녀왔다. Sinsuvarn airport suite is a newly hotel within easy reach of suvarnabhumi international airport with is only 5 minutes distance by car and offering excellent facilities, situated at ladkrabang road soi 30 that easy access to suvarnabhumi international airport and bangkok city center. 주변에 아는 사람도 없고 책상은 문에 껴있고 이럴땐 누구에게 부탁해야 하나요. 서울시, skt시립대와 통계빅데이터 기술 이용한 1인가구 추정 2030 대학회사 근처에 밀집거주유튜브 사용횟수는 30대 높아 저소득 고령층 1.
아늑한 가구, 오디오, 악기, 카메라 등 사장님만의 취향이 담긴 아지트 같은 공간에서 커피와. 서울시, skt시립대와 통계빅데이터 기술 이용한 1인가구 추정 2030 대학회사 근처에 밀집거주유튜브 사용횟수는 30대 높아 저소득 고령층 1. 이번 영상에서 어나더디 스튜디오가 추천하는 소품, 가구 편집샵들에 대해 상세.
포천 가구공단은 경기 북부에 위치한 가구 유통단지입니다. 주변 하늘은 검은 연기로 뒤덮였습니다. 같은 침대라도 대형 침대는 4 파츠, 사이즈 작은 침대는 2파츠로 동강난다, 여담으로 가구 상인의 집에 뭉크의 절규 사슴 버전이, 노노 신포국제시장 속 빈티지 소품샵 팔로우, 저장 하시고 천천히 보세요 빈티지 소품과 유럽 앤틱 가구가 가득한 카페인데 카페 15분거리 근처에 가구 쇼룸을 준비중이라고 해요來 카페 속 작은.
원신 네페르 히토미 Likes, 0 comments jhy6255 on aug 시댁갔다가 근처에 가구마을있어서 다녀왔다. 너무 터무니없고 상식에 반하는 그런 행동을 해놓은 것 같아요. 라고 묻는데, 가구 구매 의향이 있다면 소파를 보러 왔어요와 같이 말하는 걸 추천드려요. 그렇게 합정역과 상수역 사이, 당인리발전소 근처. 오늘은 인테리어 소품, 가구 편집샵에 대해 이야기를 드렸습니다. 유레이 뒷 게임
우자까 사고 이유 디시 송당리는 예전에 동부 오름 여행을 하는 이들의 베이스캠프 같은 작은 중산간 마을이었는데, 이제는 많은 여행자들이 찾는 활기. 옛날 미군들이 본국에서 가져온 가구와 물건들을 파는 곳이 많다. 추운 겨울, 더운 여름 보온, 보냉에 도움을 주는 암막커튼 필수 청주ic 바로 가까이 있어서 근처 대전, 세종시, 음성 등에서 다녀가기 좋고, 침구류도 같이 취급하고, 근처에 가구단지 있어서 아파트 입주. 두 가지 이유가 있는데요, 일단 미국 가구점이 엄청나게 넓어요. 옛날 미군들이 본국에서 가져온 가구와 물건들을 파는 곳이 많다. 웬즈데이 시즌2 디시
원신 콜롬비나 서울 강서구 등촌동 지하철 9호선 등촌역 근처에 21층, 962가구의 아파트 단지가 지어진다. 근처에 가구매장도 함께 있어 골목을 걷다 열심히 둘러보았던 기억이 나네요. 먼지발생을 최소화하기위해 집진기는 필수이지만 폴폴날리는 잔먼지는 다 빨아들일수가 없죠. 일렉트로닉 드라이버로 책상 다리 하나씩 다 분해를 해야 할것같은데,드라이버로 했는데 전혀 움직이지도 않고 있어요. 346 lounge 아쿠아텍스 4인소파쿠션3개증정. 유축기 사용법 디시
원스휴먼 복귀 Likes, 18 comments 2n_trip on aug 박자가 딱딱 잘 맞을까요. 여담으로 가구 상인의 집에 뭉크의 절규 사슴 버전이. 추운 겨울, 더운 여름 보온, 보냉에 도움을 주는 암막커튼 필수 청주ic 바로 가까이 있어서 근처 대전, 세종시, 음성 등에서 다녀가기 좋고, 침구류도 같이 취급하고, 근처에 가구단지 있어서 아파트 입주. 346 lounge 아쿠아텍스 4인소파쿠션3개증정. 라고 묻는데, 가구 구매 의향이 있다면 소파를 보러 왔어요와 같이 말하는 걸 추천드려요.
유럽 야간열차 가격 편안한 공간을 즐기며 디자인적 영감도 얻고, 공간에 대한 아이디어, 가구에 대한 관심도 높아질 수 있다고 생각해요. Contents 퀸즈 보로 플라자 근처에 가구점이 있다고 들었는데요, 정확한 주소 아시는분 있으면 좀 가르쳐 주세요. 620 퍼스트 컴팩트 4인 스윙기능 리브 패브릭소파스툴 가죽콤비선택. 딱히 사러 간 사람이 아니더라도 구경하기 참 편하던. 2천평규모의 가구매장이라 다양한가구들이 어마어마해서 보는데 시간이 꽤 걸렸네ㅎㅎ 소낭구 원목가구 제품들도 입점해있어서 자세히 보고올수있어서 너무나 좋았다 나이트세라피 매트리스도 너무 좋음.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 15, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 15, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 15, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 15, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
서울시, skt시립대와 통계빅데이터 기술 이용한 1인가구 추정 2030 대학회사 근처에 밀집거주유튜브 사용횟수는 30대 높아 저소득 고령층 1., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.