유저방송 방송 축제에서 팬티 노출한 뉴진스 민지.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

프로미스나인 노지선 노출 위험했던 가슴골 2. 뉴진스 민지, 흘러내린 의상에 한쪽 어깨 노출될라점점. 곧 배틀그라운드에서 뉴진스 컬래버 월드 노출이 심한 의상을 입힌 뒤, 사진과 영상을 찍어 온라인에 공유하며. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 마이데일리 송일섭 기자 뉴진스 다니엘과 민지가 16일 오전 서울시청 다목적홀에서 진행된 2023 서울 홍보대사 감사패 수여 및 위촉식행사에서 포토타임을 갖고 있다.

민지 뉴진스 직캠 Minji Newjeans Njz Kpop Fancam.

그룹 2ne1 멤버 공민지가 파격적인 착시 비키니 자태를 공개했다.. 축제에서 팬티 노출한 뉴진스 민지 유저방송..

Com › Shorts › Fiplrsuozbm뉴진스 Newjeans 민지 속바지 노출 레전드 Youtube.

Com › entertainment › enter_general뉴진스 민지, 흘러내린 의상에 한쪽 어깨 노출될라&mldr, 공민지는 22일 자신의 인스타그램에 you라는 글과 함께 영상을 게재했다. Com › shorts › fiplrsuozbm뉴진스 newjeans 민지 속바지 노출 레전드 youtube.

그룹 2ne1 출신 가수 공민지가 파격적인 패션을 뽐냈다. 뉴진스 민지, 흘러내린 의상에 한쪽 어깨 노출될라점점. 노출은 상업적으로 청소년들의 정신건강에 좋지 않기. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 마이데일리 송일섭 기자 뉴진스 다니엘과 민지가 16일 오전 서울시청 다목적홀에서 진행된 2023 서울 홍보대사 감사패 수여 및 위촉식행사에서 포토타임을 갖고 있다. 생일 파티에서 포착된 민지의 달라진 헤메코, 포착하셨나요. 생일 파티에서 포착된 민지의 달라진 헤메코, 포착하셨나요.

송일섭 기자 andlyu@mydaily. Com › angelk12 › 222987780340뉴진스 김민지 과거사진 총집합 50개 이상 많아요 네이버 블로그. 청순가련한 룩을 대표하는 ‘하프업’ 스타일에 사이드 뱅으로 얼굴 라인을 감싸 이목구비가 더 돋보여요. 엔믹스 오해원 끈나시 봉긋 윗가슴 3, Com › view › 11580383920뉴진스 민지 배꼽 엉덩이 앞뒤로 노출 짤방 일베저장소, 공민지는 속살이 다 비치는 착장에 블랙 킬힐을 read more.

엔믹스 오해원 끈나시 봉긋 윗가슴 3. 뉴진스 민지, 흘러내린 의상에 한쪽 어깨 노출될라점점 성숙해지는 아우라, 공민지, 2ne1 막내의 깜짝 노출속살 다 비치는 시스루 의상. 축제에서 팬티 노출한 뉴진스 민지 유저방송. 뉴진스 민지, 흘러내린 의상에 한쪽 어깨 노출될라점점 성숙해지는 아우라 뉴진스 민지가 성숙해진 무드를 풍겼다, Com › shorts › a4rgaveiuha민지 방송사고 youtube.

Kr › Idol › 61117뉴진스 민지 가슴골 살짝 걸그룹 연예인 짤티비 Jjtv.

생일 파티에서 포착된 민지의 달라진 헤메코, 포착하셨나요. 사진 속 공민지는 몸매 라인이 그대로 드러나는 시스루 의상을 입고 매력적인 표정을 짓고 있는 모습. 뉴진스가 지난 7월 22일 1주년을 맞이했죠, 공민지, 전신 시스루 패션속살 노출 깜짝. 축제에서 팬티 노출한 뉴진스 민지 유저방송.

나도 스크랩하기 카카오톡 공유 나 같아도 빨리 자랑하고 싶어서 난리였을듯ㅋㅋㅋㅋ +뮤비 +데뷔무대 봐도 봐도 김민지. 공민지는 21일 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 la 바이브라는 글과 함께 사진을 게재했다, 공개된 사진에는 휴가를 즐기고 있는 공민지의 모습이 담겨 있었다, 뉴진스 민지 높은계단 올라가는 인천공항본부세관 홍보대사. 노출은 상업적으로 청소년들의 정신건강에 좋지 않기.

공민지는 21일 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 la 바이브라는 글과 함께 사진을 게재했다. 뉴진스 민지, 크롭톱 입으니 배꼽이 빼꼼 보여첫사랑 기억 조작 비주얼 뉴진스 민지가 청순한 일상을 공개했다. 0 134526 11 모에모에큥 2023.

생일 파티에서 포착된 민지의 달라진 헤메코, 포착하셨나요, 지난 번 포스팅엔 뉴진스 민지 프로필에 대해서 자세히 적었으니, 이번엔 사진만 잔뜩 공유. 뉴진스 민지 배꼽 엉덩이 앞뒤로 노출, 그룹 2ne1 멤버 공민지가 파격적인 착시 비키니 자태를 공개했다. 사진 속 공민지는 몸매 라인이 그대로 드러나는 시스루 의상을 입고 매력적인 표정을 짓고 있는 모습.

축제에서 팬티 노출한 뉴진스 민지 유저방송.. 뉴진스 민지, 흘러내린 의상에 한쪽 어깨 노출될라점점.. 송일섭 기자 andlyu@mydaily.. 송일섭 기자 andlyu@mydaily..

3k views 2 years ago more. 곧 배틀그라운드에서 뉴진스 컬래버 월드 노출이 심한 의상을 입힌 뒤, 사진과 영상을 찍어 온라인에 공유하며. 출국하는 트리플에스 채연 흰 블라우스 묵직한 v넥 가슴골 노출 4. 공민지, 속옷 노출 파격도발적인 섹시춤까지 ten. 공개된 사진에는 휴가를 즐기고 있는 공민지의 모습이 담겨 있었다, 특히 한쪽 어깨로 흘러내린 화이트 톱을 입은 민지는.

트리플에스 김유연 노출 지난주 민지콩 3만원 적립금 이벤트 당첨자 발표를. 일베저장소 일간베스트, 개드립, 짤방, 유머 게시판. 프로미스나인 노지선 노출 위험했던 가슴골 2. 사진 속 공민지는 몸매 라인이 그대로 드러나는 시스루 의상을 입고 매력적인 표정을 짓고 있는 모습. 유저방송 방송 축제에서 팬티 노출한 뉴진스 민지. 토 비타 신치 디시

튠브로 사진 속 공민지는 몸매 라인이 그대로 드러나는 시스루 의상을 입고 매력적인 표정을 짓고 있는 모습. Com › shorts › fiplrsuozbm뉴진스 newjeans 민지 속바지 노출 레전드 youtube. Com › view › 11580383920뉴진스 민지 배꼽 엉덩이 앞뒤로 노출 짤방 일베저장소. 축제에서 팬티 노출한 뉴진스 민지 유저방송. 프로미스나인 노지선 노출 위험했던 가슴골 2. 탄산수양 얼굴

트위터 동영상 다운 디시 어려도 너무 어린 중학생에게 의상이 진짜 심각. 뉴진스가 지난 7월 22일 1주년을 맞이했죠. 뉴진스 다니엘민지, 과감한 복근 노출 md포토. 공민지는 속살이 다 비치는 착장에 블랙 킬힐을 read more. 뉴스엔 배효주 기자 공민지가 속옷이 노출되는 파격적인 의상을 선보였다. 터랭킹

터치드 윤민 남친 디시 유저방송 방송 축제에서 팬티 노출한 뉴진스 민지. Kr › board › index움짤 시구 연습하는 뉴진스 민지두산 유니폼 틈 은근슬겨 + 브라. 어려도 너무 어린 중학생에게 의상이 진짜 심각. Com › entertainment › enter_general뉴진스 민지, 흘러내린 의상에 한쪽 어깨 노출될라&mldr. 3k views 2 years ago more.

트위터 도태 그룹 2ne1 멤버 공민지가 파격적인 착시 비키니 자태를 공개했다. 일베저장소 일간베스트, 개드립, 짤방, 유머 게시판. 아직 김민지 개인 인스타그램은 보이지 않으니, newjeans 공식 인스타그램이라도 공유해 둔다. 뉴진스 민지 배꼽 엉덩이 앞뒤로 노출. 생일 파티에서 포착된 민지의 달라진 헤메코, 포착하셨나요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.