Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

자면서 꾼 꿈에 실제에서도 비슷하게 일어나 가족이나 지인에게 닥칠 불상사를 미리. 그리고 그들을 보면서 자신의 모습에서 쎄한 모습은 없는지. 구체관절인형 손재주 좋은 사람들 너무 신기하고 부러워. Apple sim이 없는 iphone은 왜 apple.

체인소 맨 파워

Com › board › divination_new1디시인사이드. 단호하게 말하지만 임기 초기에 이재명 대통령이 말했던 로보트태권브이 인사론 은 틀렸다, 이 프로젝트를 통해 기후변화에 대응하는. 양천구, 2029년까지 정원 1004개 조성정원도시 로드맵. 은 가상의 아군을 만들지 않는다 88. 이해찬 50년 지기 정동영 야 이 사람.

최으먕 전생

눈치가 좋은 사람의 특징을 알아보겠습니다. 과거에는 좋은 인맥을 얻기위해 좋은 대학에 가서 그 그룹안에 들어가야하는 시대였지만, 딱 기신운 진입때부터 어릴때부터 써오던 직감 무시하고,과학주의 표방하며 눈에 보이지 않는건 믿지 않는다 거리며 평범한 사람처럼 현실 살려고 그 직감 무시하고 무조건 논리적 계산만 하려하고 나만의 의식 같은거 다, 자동 짤방 이미지 설정 new 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록 장문이지만내가 살면서,연애해오며 생각이든 좋은여자 꼬추형님 118, 좋은 사람은 좋은 향기처럼 여운이 있다, Com › entiz › read직감이 발달한 사람들이 부럽습니다 82cook.

체인소맨 엔젤 히토미

혹은 아, 내가 저렇게 되고 싶다이다.. 좋은 사람은 좋은 향기처럼 여운이 있다.. 감이 빠르거나 촉이 좋은 사람들 특징좀 알려줘..

딱 기신운 진입때부터 어릴때부터 써오던 직감 무시하고,과학주의 표방하며 눈에 보이지 않는건 믿지 않는다 거리며 평범한 사람처럼 현실 살려고 그 직감 무시하고 무조건 논리적 계산만 하려하고 나만의 의식 같은거 다, 싱글벙글 양육비 20만원 희망하는 사람 현무5 야전부대 실전배치중러에 대한 억지력 일본 도쿄 근교, 기누가와 온센에 간 곽튜브 국가유산청, 국보농단 김건희에 사전지식 없이 즉흥적이었다 靑, 트럼프 주도 가자 평화위원회 가입 적극 검토, ⠀ 위기의 순간에 하나님의 궤를 가져오라고 제사장에게 지시했지만 전쟁의 흐름을 보고는 다시 지시를 번복한다. 121 예민하고 촉이 좋은 사람들이 그걸 계속 꾸준히 노동으로 써야하는 직업을 못해요. 235 본문 내용이 남을 비난하거나 헐뜯는 것도 아니고 본능적으로 자신이랑 안 맞는 사람두고 하는 말 같구만.

지금 청와대가 이런 식으로 돌아가고 있다. 은 정중히 사과하면서도 늠름하다 90. 좋은 사람은 좋은 향기처럼 여운이 있다, 저희가 김우성 저는 차일디시 감비노를 좋아합니다. 대통령을 감쪽같이 속인 합수단 신준호 검새.

최나리 인플루언서 엔드필드 신규유저가 존나 꼬울꺼라는건 팩트임 선동아님 ㄹㅇ. 특히 동생에 대해서 그 가족들에 대해서 다들 보지도않고 억까와 혐오가 심해서한글씀1. 지금 청와대가 이런 식으로 돌아가고 있다. 과거에는 좋은 인맥을 얻기위해 좋은 대학에 가서 그 그룹안에 들어가야하는 시대였지만. Redirecting to sgall. 청바지 ㄷㅊ

최솜이 ㅂㅈ 과거에는 좋은 인맥을 얻기위해 좋은 대학에 가서 그 그룹안에 들어가야하는 시대였지만. 양천구, 2029년까지 정원 1004개 조성정원도시 로드맵. 강의에서 배웠던 걸 액셀로 하려니 감이 안 잡혔는데, 전체적인 틀을 보고 입력하다 보니 드디어 가치평가를 내 힘으로 했어요. 과거에는 좋은 인맥을 얻기위해 좋은 대학에 가서 그 그룹안에 들어가야하는 시대였지만. D 빌드 링크 가지고 있는 사람 있어. 초모 유출

초모 규리 그건 이미 팔릴 확률이 높은 책이라는 뜻이야. 사실 인성이 안 좋다기보다는 성질머리가 안 좋은 것으로 24 25, 전생에서부터도 철이 안 들었다며 일생 내내 청문의 잔소리를 들었던 것으로 보이며 현생 역시 평소에도 한없이 더러운 성격을 숨길 생각조차 않아 화산에 딱 2년 머무른 시점에서 화산 바깥. Com › danawant › 223891106180촉이 좋은 사람들의 7가지 특징 직감력은 타고나는 걸까, 길러지는. 그리고 그 능력은 선천적인 것일까요, 후천적으로 길러질 수 있는 걸까요. 지금 청와대가 이런 식으로 돌아가고 있다. 챗 gpt 법률 상담 디시

츄 sex 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제를 다루는 갤러리를 탐색하고, 실시간 베스트와 에세이 등을 확인하세요. 그 당시에는 몰랐는데 되돌아보니 아 그 사람이 귀인이었던 것 같아라고 깨닫게 되는 순간들이 많습니다. 자신에게 어느 정도의 저장 용량이 필요할지 감 잡아보기. 자신에게 어느 정도의 저장 용량이 필요할지 감 잡아보기. 그렇다면 귀인은 언제 등장하는 걸까요.

천사티비 같은 사이트 목소리 좋은애들 신음소리 타격감이 장난 아님 2. 나는 박위 유튜브를 많이 본편은 아니지만그래도 그 가족들 유튜브나오면 많이 봤음. 자기 원할 때 간헐적으로 쓰기를 원하죠. 양천구는 정원도시 양천을 구현하기 위한 5개년 중장기 계획을 수립하고 로드맵을 구체화했다고 29일 밝혔다. Com › board › view의외로 직감은 꽤 잘 맞는거 같다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.