Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

25 1401 버장애들 다주보고 희망회로 돌리는거 웃기네 하지만 빨간약 현실은 악녀 치지직 갤러리 2026. 노캠들 얼굴환상깨는건 악녀가 진짜 큰일하긴햇지 치지직. 25 1401 버장애들 다주보고 희망회로 돌리는거 웃기네 하지만 빨간약 현실은 악녀 치지직 갤러리 2026. 모두의 마블이나 파티 애니멀즈 같은 게임에선 경식이 할아버지와 팀을 이뤄.

Akb48 Torrent

Asmr갤 여성

그 운전하고 있고 밑에서 찍은 사진 맞음.. 악녀 얼굴박제한 마이크흐 동영상목록 ㅇㅇ116.. 악녀도 얼굴 공개되기전에 듀라한들끼리 예쁘다고 존나빨아줌..

Alexandra Onlyfans

불의의 사고로 얼굴이 노출된 악녀는 기왕 까인김에 캠방을 하려고 했지만 서청자들이 도저히 안되겠다며 제발 캠을 꺼달라해서 듀라한으로 돌아갔다. Com › 2713582422얼굴 까고 충격먹었던 사람 또있음 치지직 에펨코리아, 2019년 초에 류으미는 봄여우, 악녀, 투보와 함께 4인 스키여행을 가기로 하면서 현실에서 봄여우와 대면할 수 있게 되었다, 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다.

21 0809 유메는 악녀 다 키보토스 최고의 신비를 이토록 망가뜨려놓은 희대의 악녀 다 반박하고싶으면 부활해서 얼굴 마주보고 반박하도록 블루 아카이브 2025.. Com › mini › bbgal1204악녀 얼굴까서 망했다는 에바임 버츄얼 인터넷방송 미니 갤러리.. 유칸시는 얼굴 다까고했었고 리코는 반캠 20대 여자는 평범 이상만 돼도 왠만해선 얼굴 깔려고함 20대녀가한 사진조차 없으면 걍 알만하지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 못까는 애들이 빨간약 존나 팔아먹음 못생김 9호, 악녀 버츄얼 스나 2025.. 23 1227 카오스 악녀마렵네 레드붑 2024..

Aion2 日本 から

그 운전하고 있고 밑에서 찍은 사진 맞음. 악녀를 표현한 이미지에는 모두 빨간 머리와 뿔이 들어가 있고, 이 특징은 팬아트에도 항상 반영되고 있다, 23 1227 카오스 악녀마렵네 레드붑 2024.

alena yanchevskaya 21 0809 유메는 악녀 다 키보토스 최고의 신비를 이토록 망가뜨려놓은 희대의 악녀 다 반박하고싶으면 부활해서 얼굴 마주보고 반박하도록 블루 아카이브 2025. 04 175555 조회 22160 추천 275 댓글 25 트태희거리길래 뭐 당연히 김태희급은 아니겟지만 그래도 어느정도 괜찮게 생겻으니까 그러나보다라고 생각햇는데. Com › board › view악녀 레전드 실화 스트리머 갤러리. 30 1919 새로고침 만두 보이스리플 이미지표우 얼마나 뚱뚱하면 아무것도 안했는데 일반 ㅇㅇ 106. 뱃걸숭지 악녀 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. as109 히토미

asmr 벙커 일반 악녀 얼굴 까였을 때 진짜 쇼킹했는데 ㅇㅇ14. 23 1227 카오스 악녀마렵네 레드붑 2024. 구글에 악녀 얼굴 검색해봤는데 스트리머 갤러리. 20 17 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호. 불의의 사고로 얼굴이 노출된 악녀는 기왕 까인김에 캠방을 하려고 했지만 서청자들이 도저히 안되겠다며 제발 캠을 꺼달라해서 듀라한으로 돌아갔다. avfit av

av xhamster 트태희거리길래 뭐 당연히 김태희급은 아니겟지만 그래도 어느정도 괜찮게 생겻으니까 그러나보다라고 생각햇는데. 23 1227 카오스 악녀마렵네 레드붑 2024. 스트리머들은 악녀 캐릭터를 적절하게 활용하여 자신만의 개성과 매력을 드러내고, 시청자들과의 소통을 더욱 활발하게 만들 수 있습니다. 유튜버이자 트위치tv 유명 스트리머인 악녀님의 얼굴이 공개된 사건이 있었습니다. 게임 스트리머와 관련된 이야기를 하는 마이너 갤러리 입니다 게임 스트리머 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. av red 코리아

avwiki.net 거의 대화의 절반이 서로 욕하는 내용일 정도. 거의 대화의 절반이 서로 욕하는 내용일 정도. 불의의 사고로 얼굴이 노출된 악녀는 기왕 까인김에 캠방을 하려고 했지만서청자들이 도저히 안되겠다며 제발 캠을. 악녀가 템템버린보다 이쁘다 여자 스트리머 마이너. 04 175555 조회 22160 추천 275 댓글 25 트태희거리길래 뭐 당연히 김태희급은 아니겟지만 그래도 어느정도 괜찮게 생겻으니까 그러나보다라고 생각햇는데.

arejay kemono 게임 스트리머와 관련된 이야기를 하는 마이너 갤러리 입니다 게임 스트리머 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 19 1956 4분기 애니 신작들 트위터 팔로우 순위 정리. 악녀 공포 게임에선 쫄보인 이도원과 댕균에 비해 용감한 모습을 보여주고 자주 놀려 먹는다. 악녀도 얼굴 공개되기전에 듀라한들끼리 예쁘다고 존나빨아줌. ㄹㅇ 코가 이쁜편이라 눈만 화장잘하면 이쁠듯.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.