Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › entertainment › news菊池桃子が「nhkのど自慢」で生歌声 往年のヒット曲披露「おじさん感. Сусам фер мореs short video with ♬ ガラスの草原. Momoko kikuchi 菊池 桃子, kikuchi momoko. Sotsugyou golden☆best.

코코나 래퍼 디시

킥킥이 Av

Momoko kikuchi is a japanese actress, entertainer, singer, and scholar who was formerly represented by the talent agency, parfit production.. Com › shorts › djqpbs4134菊池桃子さんが40代で大学院へ。その「優しい理由」に共感&mldr.. 2枚目 ／ 57歳・菊池桃子、スニーカーがアクセントの冬コーデに反響「スポーティな桃子ちゃん新鮮.. 2024年4月17日 水 発売 菊池桃子デビュー40周年記念ep『eternal harmony』 svap..

台湾プロ野球・中信兄弟のチアリーダーとして活躍する菊池桃子（27）が自身初のカレンダーを発売した。 23年末まで日本のプロ野球・巨人の, 菊池桃子 ramu ラムー 登場』「bomb」 学習研究社 1988年5月号p79 1988年3月愛は心の仕事です／ラ・ムー 菊池桃子 突然のロックバンド転身 芸能 365日 あの頃ヒット曲ランキング 3月 『aera』1992年5月5日、91ページ. 菊池桃子（momoko kikuchi，きくちももこ），1968年5月4日出生于日本东京都品川区，日本女演员，毕业于日出高校，代表作包括《花过天晴》《再见了德彪西：钢琴侦探岬. 2枚目 ／ 57歳・菊池桃子、スニーカーがアクセントの冬コーデに反響「スポーティな桃子ちゃん新鮮. 10冊まとめ 昭和59年2月 〜 昭和59年12月まで 1984年 不揃い ピンナップ付き 小泉今日子 松本伊代 薬師丸ひろ子 菊池桃子 他 現在 2,200円, 歌手・俳優の菊池桃子（57）が、29日までに自身のインスタグラムを更新。「スニーカーは、私のマストアイテムです」と書き出し、スニーカーの存在感が際立つ冬の着こなしを披露した。 服装は.

클럽 사운드 디시

Tw 其他：info@ponycanyon. それぞれの制作コメントもいただいております！ 《commented by 菊池桃子》 40周年記念としてeternal harmonyをリリースさせていただくことになり、応援してくださる皆様、作品を提供してくださる作家の皆様、スタッフの皆様に大変感謝しています。. 韻律體操16年／現代舞8年／長笛、短笛 喜歡的東西.

74 38 so many dreams.. お知らせ ― 皆様、一部の出馬報道に関しましては、これまでも繰り返し否定して参りましたが、100%ございません。 この憶測が関係各位に御迷惑をお掛けしている状況です。 ご承知おきくださいませ。 菊池桃子 2020.. 女優の菊池桃子（57）が4日、自身のインスタグラムを更新。9歳上の元官僚の夫との結婚記念日を報告した。..

쿠빈 성별 디시

Jp › news › article57歳・菊池桃子、スニーカーがアクセントの冬コーデに反響「スポー. 菊池桃子 ramu ラムー 登場』「bomb」 学習研究社 1988年5月号p79 1988年3月愛は心の仕事です／ラ・ムー 菊池桃子 突然のロックバンド転身 芸能 365日 あの頃ヒット曲ランキング 3月 『aera』1992年5月5日、91ページ, お知らせ ― 皆様、一部の出馬報道に関しましては、これまでも繰り返し否定して参りましたが、100%ございません。 この憶測が関係各位に御迷惑をお掛けしている状況です。 ご承知おきくださいませ。 菊池桃子 2020. Org › wiki › 菊池桃子菊池桃子 维基百科，自由的百科全书.

1984年，以電影《內褲之洞》的女主角身分首次登上大銀幕，同年亦以《青春的惡作劇》作為歌手出道。作為偶像一舉走紅，1985年以17歲之齡在日本武道館舉辦演出，創下當時最年少 read more, Follow photos of momoko kikuchi 菊池桃子, Mou aenai kamo shirenai 415 4. Com › momoko菊池桃子 momoko @momoko.

1984年，以電影《內褲之洞》的女主角身分首次登上大銀幕，同年亦以《青春的惡作劇》作為歌手出道。作為偶像一舉走紅，1985年以17歲之齡在日本武道館舉辦演出，創下當時最年少 read more, カバー第23弾は鈴木雅之&菊池桃子さんで渋谷で5時です🫶 こちらはsyouta&erikaカバー初の試みで、原曲もduetということでsyoutaとerikaでduetで. 這次的舞蹈也超可愛的～謝謝老師和白白 而且這次在舞蹈中還讓我有solo表演技巧的機會！ 被很多人稱讚真的好開心 這次跳的是日本的歌曲呢～ 原本是不知道的歌，但覺得會 read more, Com › article › 20260129cfa42657歳・菊池桃子、スニーカーがアクセントの冬コーデに反響「スポー.

키스신 애니 1984年，以電影《內褲之洞》的女主角身分首次登上大銀幕，同年亦以《青春的惡作劇》作為歌手出道。作為偶像一舉走紅，1985年以17歲之齡在日本武道館舉辦演出，創下當時最年少 read more. それぞれの制作コメントもいただいております！ 《commented by 菊池桃子》 40周年記念としてeternal harmonyをリリースさせていただくことになり、応援してくださる皆様、作品を提供してくださる作家の皆様、スタッフの皆様に大変感謝しています。. 女優の菊池桃子57がアイドル時代のイメージから雰囲気ガラリ。最新のプライベート写真に注目があつまった。 「スニーカーは、私のマストアイテムです」と私服の定番を明かすと、スニーカーにパンツを合わせた. Momoko kikuchi topic. Patio パテオ 劇場版映画パンフレット 1992年公開作品菊池桃子 加勢大周 保坂尚輝 松雪泰子 鈴木京香 鶴見辰吾邦画日本映画 doorzo is your onestop proxy service for jdirectitems auction, offering proxy service for household goods, trendy fashion, and beauty products. 쿠도유라

코네 촉수 菊池桃子スペシャル・セレクションi von momoko kikuchi. Day ago 歌手・俳優の菊池桃子（57）が、29日までに自身のインスタグラムを更新。「スニーカーは、私のマストアイテムです」と書き出し、スニーカーの. ソニーミュージックによる菊池 桃子公式サイト。菊池 桃子の最新ニュースやリリース情報、ビデオ、ライブ・イベント出演情報、メディア情報などを掲載。. それぞれの制作コメントもいただいております！ 《commented by 菊池桃子》 40周年記念としてeternal harmonyをリリースさせていただくことになり、応援してくださる皆様、作品を提供してくださる作家の皆様、スタッフの皆様に大変感謝しています。. K_0105 on instagram 🐘💛@passion_sisters_official 11 💌 passion sisters相關：alyssalu@dorian. 키 타니 타츠야 논란

키시베 머리 菊池桃子🍑momoko @momoko. 菊池桃子 official website. 菊池桃子（momoko kikuchi，きくちももこ），1968年5月4日出生于日本东京都品川区，日本女演员，毕业于日出高校，代表作包括《花过天晴》《再见了德彪西：钢琴侦探岬洋介》《山田太郎的故事》等。菊池桃子1976年参加综艺节目《彻子的房间》，1995年出演电视剧《明るい家族計画》，2006年为动画. Days ago ラ・ムー（ra mu）とは、1988年に菊池桃子とフュージョングループ「プリズム」のサポートミュージシャンとしても知られるキーボーディストの松浦義和が中心となり、結成されたバンド。 中略ヒットには恵まれず短期間で解散した。. トップソング 卒業graduation 渋谷で5時 romantic single version 渋谷で5時 渋谷で5時 romantic single version カラオケ for female もう逢えないかも. 키오프 하늘 배꼽

타마먀 벗방 菊池桃子（momoko kikuchi，きくちももこ），1968年5月4日出生于日本东京都品川区，日本女演员，毕业于日出高校，代表作包括《花过天晴》《再见了德彪西：钢琴侦探岬洋介》《山田太郎的故事》等。菊池桃子1976年参加综艺节目《彻子的房间》，1995年出演电视剧《明るい家族計画》，2006年为动画. 菊池桃子🍑momoko threads. 菊池桃子🍑momoko @momoko. 商品説明 adventureのcdエディション。アーティストmomoko kikuchiによる全10曲のスタジオ・アルバムを収録し、メロディアスなポップスと、どこか懐かしいシティポップの空気感が溶け合う1枚です。 収録曲（disc 1 – adventure cd） 1. 76k followers 357 following 197 posts @momoko.

클리 크기 더쿠 這次的舞蹈也超可愛的～謝謝老師和白白 而且這次在舞蹈中還讓我有solo表演技巧的機會！ 被很多人稱讚真的好開心 這次跳的是日本的歌曲呢～ 原本是不知道的歌，但覺得會 read more. Hours ago タレントの菊池桃子さんが、40代で大学院に進学したエピソード。 その背景を知って、私たちも胸が熱くなりました。. 這次的舞蹈也超可愛的～謝謝老師和白白 而且這次在舞蹈中還讓我有solo表演技巧的機會！ 被很多人稱讚真的好開心 這次跳的是日本的歌曲呢～ 原本是不知道的歌，但覺得會 read more. 1枚目 ／ 57歳・菊池桃子、スニーカーがアクセントの冬コーデに反響「スポーティな桃子ちゃん新鮮. Jp › news › article57歳・菊池桃子、スニーカーがアクセントの冬コーデに反響「スポー.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.