Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

홍종현이 혜리 맘에들어하는것 같은데 ㅋㅋㅋ엄청귀여워 하는듯. ‘우결’ 가상부부 10년만 da 네이트 판. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 유튜브 채널 ‘유라유라해’‘우리 결혼했어요’의 ‘쫑아커플’ 유라와 홍종현이 12년 만에 데이트를 즐겼다. 증권가 찌라시에 떴으면 그냥 홍종현 유라 사귀는거 맞네 ㅋㅋㅋ.

방송을 통해 보여준 철벽남 기믹으로 유명세를 얻고 있었다, 공개된 사진 속에는 유라와 홍종현의 투샷이 담겼다, 홍종현 역시 자신의 sns에 같은 사진을 남기며 오랜만이야, Com › talk › 373708642유라, 전남편 홍종현 재회&mldr. 유라, 홍종현과 데이트 현장 공개12년만 불붙은 우결 쫑아커플 유라유라해 osen최이정 기자 ‘우리 결혼했어요’의 ‘쫑아커플’ 유라와 홍종현이 12년 만에 데이트를 즐겼다.

썸띵 추고도 미안하다고 한건 우리 결혼했어요 갤러리. 최근 홍종현과 유라가 10년 만에 재회해 화제가 됐습니다. 2019년 12월 현역으로 입대한 홍종, 쫑아는 유라와 홍종현이 가상부부로 호흡을 맞출 당시 이들의 애칭이다.

젖보똥 더쿠

유라, 전남편 홍종현 재회우결 가상부부 10년만 da. 홍종현이 혜리 맘에들어하는것 같은데 ㅋㅋㅋ엄청귀여워 하는듯, 증권가 찌라시에 떴으면 그냥 홍종현 유라 사귀는거 맞네, 함께 공개된 사진에는 다정하게 포즈를 취하고 있는 홍종현, 유라의, 서로를 끝까지 지켜주리라 다짐하는 김소연과 홍종현 세상에서.

유라는 해당 게시물에 꾸잉 쫑아라고 댓글을 남기기도 했다, 2019년 12월 현역으로 입대한 홍종. Kr › entertainment › article10년 전 결별했는데 팬들이 재결합 소망하는 부부.

홍종현 유라가 키스신 미션에 승부욕을 불태웠다, 어쩐지 낯이 익은 구도라 했더니 새 커플의 캐릭터가 만화책 속 주인공들과 비슷해 흥미롭다, 유라, 전남편 홍종현과 10년만 투샷‥과몰입 유발 비주얼 케미 20241228 161001 뉴스엔 이하나 기자 걸스데이 출신 유라가 가상 부부였던 홍종현과 10년만에 재회했다.

유라, 전남편 홍종현과 10년만 투샷‥과몰입 유발 비주얼 케미 20241228 161001 뉴스엔 이하나 기자 걸스데이 출신 유라가 가상 부부였던 홍종현과 10년만에 재회했다.. 아무리봐도 대박이다 미안을 입에 달고사는 유라와 눈치주는 홍종현 발리 수영장에선 절대 안봐주고..

제시 아이젠버그 더쿠

이혼後 10년 만에 재회홍종현, 유라와 유별난 역사 한끼서 만났다 스포츠조선 문지연 기자 배우 홍종현이 유라와 재회했다. 홍종현은 26일 오랜만이야 유별난역사한끼란 글을 업로드했다. 유라 본명 김아영는 걸그룹 걸스데이 의 멤버로 아이돌 이다.

홍종현과 유라는 처음 입에 빼빼로를 물고 부끄러움을 느꼈다. 우결 홍종현유라, 아슬아슬 빼빼로게임 닿을락 말락. Dc우결갤러리 by하핫 yura 유라 hongjonghyun 홍종현 jjongah 쫑아 @tsuistsuiyang 哈哈 我今天早上看了 總覺得好少. 두 사람은 2014년 mbc 예능 우리 결혼했어요4에 출연해 가상 결혼생활을 했는데요. 톱스타뉴스 김효진 기자 유라, 홍종현이 우결 이후 10년 만에 재회했다, 오늘24일 방송되는 mbc ‘우리결혼했어요 시즌4’에서는 홍종현♥유라네 옥탑방에 모인 ‘우결.

이에 홍종현 또한 오랜만이야 유별난 역사 한 끼라며 같은 사진을 게재했고, 유라는 꾸잉 쫑아라며 댓글을 남기기도 했다, 최근 아담커플 조권과 가인의 신곡과 재회가 주목받은 가운데, 우결 팬들은 이번 유라와 홍종현의 만남까지 이어지며 당시의 추억을 공유하고 있다. 방송을 통해 보여준 철벽남 기믹으로 유명세를 얻고 있었다. ㅇㅇ 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 초기 작품인 정글피쉬 2 와 화이트 크리스마스 에서 준수한 연기력으로 역을 무난하게 소화하여 배우로서 많은 팬을 얻으며 주목을 받았다.

제나 출사

이에 홍종현 또한 오랜만이야 유별난 역사 한 끼라며 같은 사진을 게재했고, 유라는 꾸잉 쫑아라며 댓글을 남기기도 했다, 홍종현 나나 사귄다는 증거 모음허접 우리 결혼했어요. 홍종현이 혜리 맘에들어하는것 같은데 ㅋㅋㅋ엄청귀여워 하는듯. 하지만 이내 적극적인 모습으로 빼빼로 길이를 줄여가 첫키스에 성공했다.

제미나이 사고모드 디시 Kr › entertainment › article10년 전 결별했는데 팬들이 재결합 소망하는 부부. 쫑아는 유라와 홍종현이 가상부부로 호흡을 맞출 당시 이들의 애칭이다. We got married, jonghyun, yoora 12 03, 홍종현유라12. 홍종현은 26일 오랜만이야 유별난역사한끼란 글을 업로드했다. 두 사람은 지난 2014년 6월 mbc 예능 우리 결혼했어요에서 가상 부부로 합류. 조이현 레전드 디시

조유라 풀팩 Kr › entertainment › article10년 전 결별했는데 팬들이 재결합 소망하는 부부. 유라♥홍종현, 21살에 만났는데 벌써 33살12년 만 재결합 순간포착 osen장우영 기자 배우 유라와 홍종현이 12년 만에 재회했다. 오늘24일 방송되는 mbc ‘우리결혼했어요 시즌4’에서는 홍종현♥유라네 옥탑방에 모인 ‘우결. 홍종현 역시 자신의 계정에 같은 사진을 업로드하며 오랜만이야. 아무리봐도 대박이다 미안을 입에 달고사는 유라와 눈치주는 홍종현 발리 수영장에선 절대 안봐주고. 제니 꼭지

제이 밍 구독 영상 증권가 찌라시에 떴으면 그냥 홍종현 유라 사귀는거 맞네. Com › article › 20260108024131664유라♥홍종현, 21살에 만났는데 벌써 33살&mldr. 공개된 사진 속에는 유라와 홍종현의 투샷이 담겼다. 홍종현은 26일 오랜만이야 유별난역사한끼란 글을 업로드했다. 톱스타뉴스 김효진 기자 유라, 홍종현이 우결 이후 10년 만에 재회했다. 전남친 차단 디시

전현무 키 디시 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 유튜브 채널 ‘유라유라해’‘우리 결혼했어요’의 ‘쫑아커플’ 유라와 홍종현이 12년 만에 데이트를 즐겼다. 홍종현은 26일 자신의 인스타그램에 오랜만이야. 홍종현 유라가 키스신 미션에 승부욕을 불태웠다. 유라 @yura_936와 홍종현 @hjonghyun의 👰🤵🫶🏻 유라의 유튜브 채널 유라유라해에 홍종현이 깜짝 등장하며, 과거 우리 결혼했어요에서 사랑받았던 ‘쫑아 커플’의 재회가 공개됐습니다. 유라, 홍종현과 데이트 현장 공개12년만 불붙은 우결 쫑아커플 유라유라해 osen최이정 기자 ‘우리 결혼했어요’의 ‘쫑아커플’ 유라와 홍종현이 12년 만에 데이트를 즐겼다.

조우 안신 증권가 찌라시에 떴으면 그냥 홍종현 유라 사귀는거 맞네. 홍종현이 혜리 맘에들어하는것 같은데 ㅋㅋㅋ엄청귀여워 하는듯. 두 사람은 지난 2014년 6월 mbc 예능 우리 결혼했어요에서 가상 부부로 합류. 공개된 사진 속에는 유라와 홍종현의 투샷이 담겼다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 osen장우영 기자 배우 유라와 홍종현이 12년 만에 재회했다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.