Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이 블로그에서 검색 전체보기 1,355개의 글 목록닫기. 매운맛과 부드러움을 양립한 메뉴 둘이서 하나 부탁할 정도로 딱 좋은지도 아오사수수께끼 가루카레 ・대성분 감자 튀김 소금마늘 버터아오사. Likes, 20 comments bokmani. 29 606 1 바르셀로나 후벵 디아스 빠른가요.

디시 촉수 산란

귀멸이노아오 목욕하고 나온 뒤 굉장히 게으른 라노벨 덕후입니다.. Com › kaokao0201twitter..

디시 히토미 링크

디시 추천순

ㅎ자신의 몸이 뜨거워지고 이상해지는 것을 느낀 아오이는 이상한 생각이 자신의 머릿 속을 채우는 것이 어색하게 느껴졌다, Profile_image 미미쟝 ip보기클릭. Likes, 0 comments judithpiano78 on novem 산부인과에 진료보러갔다가 약국에서 약사고 나물이랑 청국장이랑 야채를 사고 중간에 아들램만나서 학원카드주고 굳이 신전떡볶이 포장하기 토욜아침 아오 진단 피로, 과로, 빈혈 신전 매운맛 먹으면 낫겠지 ☺️.

빠른배송 이노치노하하 a 840정 은 중년여성의 갱년기 증상을 완화, 생약성분+비타민 아오지루입니다.. Likes, 3 comments jirye2_0ju on septem 니가아는식당 아오 시원한 국물이 해장에 짱 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 우리 가족은 편백찜보다는 아롱만두전골에 한표씩😋 전골 국물 첫술에 화들짝 순한게 생긴 국물이 상당히 칼칼🌶 매운맛 싫어하는 사람은 고추 빼 달라고 하면 된답니다 아무 정보 없이.. Profile_image 미미쟝 ip보기클릭..

디시 텀 가학

29 213 3 맨유 데헤아 떠나고 오나나 영입하면 등번호 2 탐켄치 2023. Profile_image 미미쟝 ip보기클릭. 우선 매운맛을 없애려고 물을 마시는 분들도 있고, 우유를 마시는 분들도 있습니다.

귀멸이노아오 목욕하고 나온 뒤 네이버 블로그, 116k views 5 years ago. Com › watch이노아오3 youtube, Likes, 0 comments yupgi_tteokbokki2 on j 로제엽기떡볶이&치즈 입안에서 녹아요.

야생소년이자 짐승남 이노스케와 밥잘하는 순정녀 아오이. 귀멸의칼날 하시비라이노스케 칸자키아오이 이노아오 주먹밥 수박 새우튀김 귀칼 만화. 매운맛과 부드러움을 양립한 메뉴 둘이서 하나 부탁할 정도로 딱 좋은지도 아오사수수께끼 가루카레 ・대성분 감자 튀김 소금마늘 버터아오사, 펭 @user7190 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 @하나노 키츠네 님에게 회신 이노아오 이노스케 아오이.

레제 페미

Blind 사망자 얼마 안 나오니 방역완화하자 @ 오랜만에 매운맛 니치카가 보구십다 원신감우 빵딩이 양손으로 꽉 잡고 입술박치기 하고. 과연 이런 음식들을 먹으면 혀의 통증을 없앨 수 있을까요. Likes, 3 comments jirye2_0ju on septem 니가아는식당 아오 시원한 국물이 해장에 짱 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 우리 가족은 편백찜보다는 아롱만두전골에 한표씩😋 전골 국물 첫술에 화들짝 순한게 생긴 국물이 상당히 칼칼🌶 매운맛 싫어하는 사람은 고추 빼 달라고 하면 된답니다 아무 정보 없이. 대충블로그이름 연어무조림 님의 블로그입니다.

레제 torrent It’s what’s happening twitter. Likes, 0 comments yupgi_tteokbokki2 on j 로제엽기떡볶이&치즈 입안에서 녹아요. 10키로 10만원에 제공, 만족도 높은 매운맛 김치 조절하는 법, 김치양념 추천제품. 와 매운맛 9 10 지나니까 천국이노 3 늅이임2023 강화가 전투력을 많이 올려주는구나 니나노200 🎨창작 클로에 보구가 18 ㅇㅇ202278 우이 이새끼 진짜 자동 돌리면 안되겠네 10 흔한림붕이2020 내일 점검에 맞춰 스테이지 밀었따 4. 귀멸이노아오 목욕하고 나온 뒤 굉장히 게으른 라노벨 덕후입니다. 똥서울 디시

레코야동 귀멸의칼날 탄지로 카마도탄지로 more. 과연 이런 음식들을 먹으면 혀의 통증을 없앨 수 있을까요. Com › 215귀멸 최근 사귀기 시작한 이노아오 대충블로그이름. 는 털림ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ터프잔디 퀸즈라면서 왜 더트까지 털어가는데. Yonggariyongstar76 on febru 구c의 켈리와 새우깡 ️봉지 순한맛&매운맛 사서 갈매기들이랑 나눔하러 갔는데 없다 🧔‍♀️나 완전히 🐦‍⬛새됐어. 라방 자위

레즈망가 Com › kaokao0201twitter. 요즘 밥태기 와서 너는 단감이나 먹어라 하고 깎아줬더니 내가 먹는 카레에 신김치 달라고 그래서 줬더니 먹는다. 귀멸의 칼날 이노아오 알콩달콩한 만화 12. 1k views 1 year ago 귀멸의칼날 귀칼 시노부. Com › 215귀멸 최근 사귀기 시작한 이노아오 대충블로그이름. 레제수영장씬

레츠다오 얼굴 ㅠㅠ 아오 kelly 손석구 @sonsukku 구씨 7eleven @7elevenkorea 새우깡 @nongshim 농심새우깡 갈매기들다어디갔니 갈매기 혼술 해장술 나홀로해변. 매운맛 컵라면의 경우 마요네즈 를 넣어 먹으면 팔도 도시락 라면과 비슷한 맛이 난다는 의견이 있다. Likes, 3 comments jirye2_0ju on septem 니가아는식당 아오 시원한 국물이 해장에 짱 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 우리 가족은 편백찜보다는 아롱만두전골에 한표씩😋 전골 국물 첫술에 화들짝 순한게 생긴 국물이 상당히 칼칼🌶 매운맛 싫어하는 사람은 고추 빼 달라고 하면 된답니다 아무 정보 없이. 빠른배송 이노치노하하 a 840정 은 중년여성의 갱년기 증상을 완화, 생약성분+비타민 아오지루입니다. 매운맛과 부드러움을 양립한 메뉴 둘이서 하나 부탁할 정도로 딱 좋은지도 아오사수수께끼 가루카레 ・대성분 감자 튀김 소금마늘 버터아오사.

딜도 흡연 가능 호텔 Com › 215귀멸 최근 사귀기 시작한 이노아오 대충블로그이름. 빠른배송 이노치노하하 a 840정 은 중년여성의 갱년기 증상을 완화, 생약성분+비타민 아오지루입니다. 과연 이런 음식들을 먹으면 혀의 통증을 없앨 수 있을까요. 귀멸의칼날 탄지로 카마도탄지로 more. 이토엔 오이오차 체지방을 줄여주는 이치방 츠마미 잎 1000.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.