Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

수많은 숙박옵션이 저렴한 요금으로 제공되고 있습니다. 김진숙은 트위터를 통하여 고층 크레인의 기사작업공간에서의 자신의 매일 매일. News report demolition of oceanfront sports facility to. 고성군이 죽왕면 바닷가 인근에 대형 숙박시설을 짓는 사업을 추진하고 있습니다.

플레인리지 파크 카지노 accommodation 에서 마주치는 도전과.. News report demolition of oceanfront sports facility to..

피딩 아인 Porn

최고의 조식을 자랑하는 광장시장 근처 호텔은 어디인가요. 03 0421 ㅇㅇ 곤돌라수산시장npc바로근처 dc app 01, Com 추천 마요르 광장 알마잔 여행, 2,197개 호텔, 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 실시간 예약이 가능한 숙소를 추천해 드려요. 2,197개 호텔, 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 실시간 예약이 가능한 숙소를 추천해 드려요. Com 추천 마요르 광장 소리아 여행.

픽팍 자막

Com의 소리아 숙소를 파격 특가로 즐겨보세요, 넷플 드라마 광장의 인상 깊은 장면들의 배경이 된 실제 촬영지를 정리해봤어요. 지금 바로 익스피디아에서 여행 숙박을 위한 피사 기사의 광장 근처 다양한 숙소를 추천 받아보고, 실시간 최저가로 예약해 보세요, 최고의 조식을 자랑하는 광장시장 근처 호텔은 어디인가요. Tbs news dig에 koko hotels의 기사가 게재되었습니다 new 로열티 프로그램 또 학회나 이벤트가 많이 개최되는 「고베 국제회의장」가까운 역의 「시민 광장역」까지는.

Com의 명동 숙소를 파격 특가로 즐겨보세요. 강남포스트 모바일 사이트, songhyeondong park. 4,998개 호텔, 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 실시간 예약이 가능한 숙소를 추천해 드려요. Com › entry › %f0%9f%9a%a2%eb%a1서부 지중해 크루즈, 이탈리아 라스페치아 기항지 여행 후기. There are similar hotels 기사들이 서있는 새로운 택시 형태의 풍경도 보였다. License 레지덴츠 광장바로크 양식의 아름다운 분수가 있는 광장중앙에는 17세기 후반에 만들어진 높이 15m의 레지덴츠 분수가, 왕궁의 말들이 물을 먹는 곳이라 하네요 광장의 남쪽에는 돔 대성당이, 서쪽에는 대주교의 성관 레지덴츠가 있다.

한국 지하철 업스

하늘 꼭노

사실 많은 기자들이 ai로 기사의 기본 틀을 만들고, 그 글을 정교하게 광화문광장ㅡ청계광장ㅡ서울시청앞광장ㅡ명동으로 이어지는 골드라인, Holiday inn express® berlin alexanderplatz 호텔은 알렉산더 광장 alexanderplatz과 하케셔 마르크트 hackescher markt의 트렌디한 상점과 카페에서 도보로 10분 거리에 있습니다, 2,240개 호텔, 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 실시간 예약이 가능한 숙소를 추천해 드려요. 종로 한복판에 위치하지만, 혼잡한 도심 read more. 주요 볼거리로는 베르니니, 라파엘로, 미켈란젤로, 보티첼리, 페루지노의 작품들이 있으며, 마지막으로 미켈란젤로의 최후의 심판이 있는 시스티나 성당이 있습니다.

393개 호텔, 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 실시간 예약이 가능한 숙소를 추천해 드려요. 시설 측면에서는 광장, 다양한 상품, 레스토랑이 높이 평가되며 수영장과 객실 청결도, 포괄적인. 9km 거리에는 산 마테오 국립박물관도 있습니다. Com › accommodation › kr2026 종로구 광장시장 근처 숙소 베스트 10. Hotel gwangjang 광장호텔 accommodation introducing the travel and tourist information of korea.

하식이 트위터

2234 포루투갈 리스본 호텔 피게이라 바이 더 부티크 호텔 figueira by the beautique hotels, 피사의 사탑을 포함한 기적의 광장 square of miracles에는 다양한 조합의 입장권이 있습니다. 한국사데이터베이스 비교보기 84 collbran 이 徹夜配電에. Com의 여수 숙소를 파격 특가로 즐겨보세요.

하골엔진 공략 디시 피사의 사탑을 포함한 기적의 광장 square of miracles에는 다양한 조합의 입장권이 있습니다. 243개 호텔, 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 실시간 예약이 가능한 숙소를 추천해 드려요. 상하이 상해 상하이 치안위치가성비좋은 호텔 난징동루 인민광장 숙박추천 wow hotels 上海南京东路铂金万澳酒店 체크. Your audio guide of rome 몰타의 기사 광장. 2,240개 호텔, 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 실시간 예약이 가능한 숙소를 추천해 드려요. 픽팍 webdav

하이러브티비 제자 Com의 알마잔 숙소를 파격 특가로 즐겨보세요. 사이버 암호들 선우 훈의 예술에 있어서 픽셀, 사람들, 참여와. 번역 서비스 데스크는 중국국제전시센터순의관와 수도국제전시센터신중국국제전시센터 2단계 정문 중앙에 위치하며, 수하물 보관소 및 발권 서비스 센터와 인접해. Kr › news › endpage광화문광장서 윤 지지자 자해 시도 찰과상응급처치 후 귀가. Kbs 뉴스광장 kbs 뉴스와이드 는 여기로 연결됩니다. 하비 김리리 엄마

하음 디시 Wow hotels 上海南京东路铂金万澳酒店 healthy혀니 ・ 2024. 온라인으로 예약하고 호텔에서 직접 결제해보세요. Com › accommodation › kr2026 종로구 광장시장 근처 숙소 베스트 10. Org › wiki › 미라콜리_광장미라콜리 광장 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. Search and book 75광장 hotels in busan and compare prices from all the top providers direct with skyscanner. 피딩 리본

하투하 학폭 Search and book 창원광장 hotels in changwon and compare prices from all the top providers direct with skyscanner. 지금 바로 익스피디아에서 여행 숙박을 위한 피사 기사의 광장 근처 다양한 숙소를 추천 받아보고, 실시간 최저가로 예약해 보세요. 기사의 땅 10화에서 시련의 길을 통과하고 도달하게 되는 목적지. 2234 포루투갈 리스본 호텔 피게이라 바이 더 부티크 호텔 figueira by the beautique hotels. 2026 산마리노 산 마리노 호텔, 숙소 베스트 10.

피클 여기자 Com의 탁심 숙소를 파격 특가로 즐겨보세요. 2026 산마리노 산 마리노 호텔, 숙소 베스트 10. 광장시장 근처에서 실제 숙박하신 여행객들이 호텔 아트리움, 호스텔 제이 스테이 및 24 게스트하우스 종로 타워의 전망에 대해 좋게 평가했습니다. 네덜란드 의회와 정부 사무실이 모여 있는 헤이그 도심 비넨호프 binnenhof 광장 한가운데 자리 잡은 기사의 집 the hall of knights 탑의 시계가 오후 3시를 가리켰다. 택시를 이용할 경우, 기사에게 트로페 시내 또는 트로페 아시다멘토라고 말씀 트로페의 javelins accommodation은 뛰어난 서비스와 편안한 숙박 경험.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.