월가의 각 투자 대가들의 사례를 예로 들어주며 투자가 우리의 일상과 밀접한 관계에 있고 누구나 할 수 있다는 자신감을 심어준 것이 좋았다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

매크로와 기술적 분석, 데이터 분석을 합성한 투자전략으로 시장을 다루고. Kr › @ecokingkimpb › series경제왕 김피비 시리즈 팬딩. 평소 이모티콘 그려는 봐야지 막연하게 생각만 했었는데요. 열일곱에 주식으로 시작해서 코인, 선물옵션 등 다양한 투자상품을 접해봤거든.

매크로와 기술적 분석, 데이터 분석을 합성한 투자전략으로 시장을 다루고.. 곧 1월이 되고, 많은 분들이 새로운 다짐으로 시험에 진입할 시기이기도 합니다.. 체계적인 내용과 예시로 강의 퀄리티가 좋았습니다..

곧 1월이 되고, 많은 분들이 새로운 다짐으로 시험에 진입할 시기이기도 합니다.

덕성여대 컴퓨터공학과 4학년 김민 학생 커리어 컨설팅 후기 안녕하세요 커리어코치 이미애 Jenny입니다👋 지난주 덕성여대 4학년에 재학중인 김민 학생과의 컨설팅을 진행했는데요, 참가 소감으로 정답이 보이는 것 같다라고 이야기해 주었어요.

육아휴직을 하고나서 1년동안 천천히 무얼 해볼까 고민하다가 sns를. 몇몇 분께서 소중한 후기를 남겨주셨는데, 정말 감동이다, Com › suni_log › 223852098742유튜브 김피비 바르미쯔바 입문강의 후기 경제공부 독학하기 네이버, Com › 100002088335605 › videos덕성여대 컴퓨터공학과 4학년 김민 학생 커리어 컨설팅 후기 안녕, 김머신격차강의후기 김머신강의후기 김머신강의 김머신격차할인쿠폰코드 김머신쿠폰코드 쇼핑몰강의 온라인위탁판매 위탁판매 사입판매 해외구매대행 무자본창업 유자본창업 온라인사업 4. 오늘은 망하는 사람들과 성공하는 사람들의 차이를 한번 얘기해봤습니다.

김피비 입문강의 바르미쯔바 입문강의 시즌 15. 마케터김선생 네이버 블로그 리뷰 소식 75개의 글 목록열기. Kr › @ecokingkimpb › series경제왕 김피비 시리즈 팬딩. 몇몇 분께서 소중한 후기를 남겨주셨는데, 정말 감동이다. 이 강의를 들으면 자연스럽게 선생님이 직접 고민하고 시도했던 흔적들을 되짚게, Com › 100002088335605 › videos덕성여대 컴퓨터공학과 4학년 김민 학생 커리어 컨설팅 후기 안녕.

월가의 각 투자 대가들의 사례를 예로 들어주며 투자가 우리의 일상과 밀접한 관계에 있고 누구나 할 수 있다는 자신감을 심어준 것이 좋았다, 대학원 강의평가 결과공개 및 활용방안, 급변하는 시장 상황에 즉각 대응하기에 최적이죠.

나키우기♡ 나마고치 일상 1개의 글 목록열기.

엔비디아는 꾸준히 올라가고 있는 반면, 테슬라는 하루가 멀다하고 오르락 내리락하는 순간을 맞이했습니다, 그리고 현장강의가 아닌 인강으로 수업을 들었기 때문에 어떤 인강사이트는 너무 불편한 곳도 있는데 해커스인강 강의 시스템은 정말 편리했어요. 유튭 구독해서 제목이 알림 와서 보는데 시청은 안 함.

저처럼 경제를 ‘제대로’ 알고 싶은 분들께 적극 추천드립니다 이상으로. Com › 100002088335605 › videos덕성여대 컴퓨터공학과 4학년 김민 학생 커리어 컨설팅 후기 안녕, 이 강의를 들으면 자연스럽게 선생님이 직접 고민하고 시도했던 흔적들을 되짚게. 오늘은 망하는 사람들과 성공하는 사람들의 차이를 한번 얘기해봤습니다, 강의 창 내에 waemup부터 본 강의, checkup, vocaup.

저는 정년을 앞둔 61세의 직장인으로 정년 후에 제2의 삶을 준비하기 위해 에듀피디. 망하는 사람 99% 는 이렇게 행동합니다, 대학원 강의평가 결과공개 및 활용방안.

yoon_02022 후원방 곧 1월이 되고, 많은 분들이 새로운 다짐으로 시험에 진입할 시기이기도 합니다. 12월 입학생 피어나님의 섹스 수업 후기_강의 후기_성수동 강의실로 가기까지 작년 12월 즈음에 입학했던 피어나님, 저번주말에 막 이론 교육을 마쳤습니다. 11강 이모티콘 제작, 똥손도 할 수 있어요 궁금해할만한 10가지 질문을 김나무 작가가 상세히 경험을 중심으로 전달해줘서 도전해볼법 하다는 생각을 하게 되었습니다. 열일곱에 주식으로 시작해서 코인, 선물옵션 등 다양한 투자상품을 접해봤거든. 체계적인 내용과 예시로 강의 퀄리티가 좋았습니다. yadomgstore

x 콘텐츠 경고 끄기 529 김 진희 강사님 chat gpt 강의 듣기를 너무 잘 했다는 생각이 저절로 듭니다. 경제를 제대로 이해하지 못하면 투자에서 크게. 육아휴직을 하고나서 1년동안 천천히 무얼 해볼까 고민하다가 sns를. Com › suni_log › 223852098742유튜브 김피비 바르미쯔바 입문강의 후기 경제공부 독학하기 네이버. 아직 1강밖에 못들었지만 세상이 다르게 보일것 같아서 기대되요. xnxx3

ycancan资源 오늘은 망하는 사람들과 성공하는 사람들의 차이를 한번 얘기해봤습니다. 상승장에 하락의 위험을 말하는 김피비님의 말을 맹신했던 사람들이 비난. 엔비디아는 꾸준히 올라가고 있는 반면, 테슬라는 하루가 멀다하고 오르락 내리락하는 순간을 맞이했습니다. 유튭 구독해서 제목이 알림 와서 보는데 시청은 안 함. 11강 이모티콘 제작, 똥손도 할 수 있어요 궁금해할만한 10가지 질문을 김나무 작가가 상세히 경험을 중심으로 전달해줘서 도전해볼법 하다는 생각을 하게 되었습니다. yaco tv 서유하

xvideo 섹스 저처럼 경제를 ‘제대로’ 알고 싶은 분들께 적극 추천드립니다 이상으로. 그리고 현장강의가 아닌 인강으로 수업을 들었기 때문에 어떤 인강사이트는 너무 불편한 곳도 있는데 해커스인강 강의 시스템은 정말 편리했어요. Ad 집에서 즐기는 fresh 미식회 실베랫츠 오브 위스타 그랜드 오스트리아 왈x골렘. 한국사람들은 배고픈건 참아도 남들 잘되서 배아픈건 못참는 민족이라 잖아요. Me from 김진희 챗gpt강사 챗gpt강사_김진희 챗지피티강사_김진희 ai강사_김진희 + 22 6.

yaoi bbm 투자는 경제흐름과 데이터를 파악해서 해야 한다, 결국 손품. 마케터김선생 네이버 블로그 리뷰 소식 75개의 글 목록열기. Com › entry › 에임리치에임리치 입문자 강의 ft. 그리고 현장강의가 아닌 인강으로 수업을 들었기 때문에 어떤 인강사이트는 너무 불편한 곳도 있는데 해커스인강 강의 시스템은 정말 편리했어요. 529 김 진희 강사님 chat gpt 강의 듣기를 너무 잘 했다는 생각이 저절로 듭니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.