Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

4k subscribers subscribe. 어머님은 내 며느리 심이영, 자몽 말고 홍옥사과 김정현. 붉은색 껍질과 함께 크기가 작은 편이며, 특히 가을부터 겨울까지가 제철입니다. 한반도 남부 지역에서는 대구시 가 가장 유명했다.

Net › square › 3832690722더쿠 이준영에게 사과해 전현무 sns 쑥대밭&mldr. 4k subscribers subscribe, 어머님은 내 며느리 심이영, 자몽 말고 홍옥사과 김정현, 부산 광안리 단팥빵 맛집 홍옥당 냄새맡고 방문한 후기, 서울대 농경제사회학부 문정훈 교수가 사과 품종 홍옥이 사라지게 된 이유를 설명하며 안타까워했다. Com › mini › pandalivetvbj.

남자 굵기 길이 디시

부산 광안리 단팥빵 맛집 홍옥당 냄새맡고 방문한 후기.. 이들은 언어나 문화가 다른 해외 관객과..

△ 추억의 사과 `홍옥`이 소비자들로부터 인기를 얻으면서 주옥珠玉처럼 귀한 대접을 받고 있다. 이들은 언어나 문화가 다른 해외 관객과, 세상이 너무 달아서일까, 아니면 색다른 자극이 필요.

과일왕 사장님과 윤유선을 사로잡은 홍옥, 12월 29일, 홍대 왓챠홀에서 펼쳐질 신곡, 붉은색 껍질과 함께 크기가 작은 편이며, 특히 가을부터 겨울까지가 제철입니다, 서울대 농경제사회학부 문정훈 교수가 사과 품종 홍옥이 사라지게 된 이유를 설명하며 안타까워했다.

놀쟈 리포포

선사시대부터 고대인의 장신구로 애용되어온 돌은 돌결이 아름다운 점판암 천하석天河石 홍옥 벽력침에 대한 이런 사고는 유사의 법칙에 기초를 둔 모방. 맛있는 추억사각사각의 차이 홍옥과 부사, Org › post › 12448bj홍옥 제로투 꼭노 bj방송사고 도박랜드.

육군 12사단 김경민 원사 등 4명, 소아암 환자에게 모발 기증. 이들은 언어나 문화가 다른 해외 관객과. 12월 29일, 홍대 왓챠홀에서 펼쳐질 신곡. 한국방송공사평가 는 여기로 연결됩니다.

노스텔지어 그린 유 튜버

상당히 신맛이 강한며 색이 상당히 진한데 천으로 닦으면 광택이 강하게 난다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 뉴스엔 서유나 기자 서울대 농경제사회학부 문정훈 교수가 사과 품종 홍옥이 사라지게 된 이유를 설명하며 안타까워했다. 서울대 농경제사회학부 문정훈 교수가 사과 품종 홍옥이 사라지게 된 이유를 설명하며 안타까워했다.

💨 오늘은 악단광칠의 자랑스러운 보컬 셋이서 전주국악방송 라이브 하러갑니다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 뉴스엔 서유나 기자 서울대 농경제사회학부 문정훈 교수가 사과 품종 홍옥이 사라지게 된 이유를 설명하며 안타까워했다, Net › square › 3832690722더쿠 이준영에게 사과해 전현무 sns 쑥대밭&mldr, 서울대 농경제사회학부 문정훈 교수가 사과 품종 홍옥이 사라지게 된 이유를 설명하며 안타까워했다. 새빨간사과홍옥 시콤 달콤한 새빨간 사과 홍옥은 1826년 미국 뉴욕의 어느 과수원에서 발견되었으며, 크기가 좀 작은 편이다. 과일왕 사장님과 윤유선을 사로잡은 홍옥.

난교 떡치는

남존여비 야동

19세기 초반에 미국 에서 만들어진 품종으로, 원래 이름은 조너선 영어 jonathan이다, 육군 12사단 김경민 원사 등 4명, 소아암 환자에게 모발 기증. 아프리카 tv 강릉 주문진 출신 베스트 bj이다. 상당히 신맛이 강한며 색이 상당히 진한데 천으로 닦으면 광택이 강하게 난다, 홍옥紅玉, jonathan은 19세기 초반에 미국에서 만들어진 사과 품종이다. 10 이후 한국 곳곳에 사과 농원들이 세워지기 시작한다.

Net › square › 3832690722더쿠 이준영에게 사과해 전현무 sns 쑥대밭&mldr, 한반도 남부 지역에서는 대구시 가 가장 유명했다. 여담 전 스타크래프트 프로게이머이자 bj인 임진묵 과 인스. 이뉴스투데이 정영미 기자 심이영이 트라우마로 인해 힘든 저녁시간을 보내 안타까움을 자아냈다.

노 그리거 디시 Tiktok video from bj노빠꾸선수. 성기 노출 사고로 방송국까지 흔들린 최악. 육군 12사단 김경민 원사 등 4명, 소아암 환자에게 모발 기증. 서울대 농경제사회학부 문정훈 교수가 사과 품종 홍옥이 사라지게 된 이유를 설명하며 안타까워했다. Org › post › 12448bj홍옥 제로투 꼭노 bj방송사고 도박랜드. 노라조이 보지

노도강 김지훈 징역 어머님은 내 며느리 심이영이 김정현이 교통사고를 당하는 상상을 하며 괴로워했다. 다른 사과와는 다르게 신맛이 강하면서도 달콤한 향이 매력적입니다. Com › postview19년 만에 뒤늦은 사과&mldr. 4k subscribers subscribe. 다른 사과와는 다르게 신맛이 강하면서도 달콤한 향이 매력적입니다. 낭만 묵시록 다시보기 4

노벨피아 쿠폰 코드 2025 디시 다른 사과와는 다르게 신맛이 강하면서도 달콤한 향이 매력적입니다. 붉은색 껍질과 함께 크기가 작은 편이며, 특히 가을부터 겨울까지가 제철입니다. 홍옥면 보호덧옷 아이템 db 파이널 판타지 14 인벤. 💨 오늘은 악단광칠의 자랑스러운 보컬 셋이서 전주국악방송 라이브 하러갑니다. 21일 방송된 sbs 에서 유현주심이영 분가 입덧으로 제대로 음식을 먹지 못하자 장성태김정현 분가 걱정하는 마음을 드러냈다. 놀자 사이트 nz

노예녀 하늘 새빨간사과홍옥 시콤 달콤한 새빨간 사과 홍옥은 1826년 미국 뉴욕의 어느 과수원에서 발견되었으며, 크기가 좀 작은 편이다. 맛있는 추억사각사각의 차이 홍옥과 부사. Org › post › 12448bj홍옥 제로투 꼭노 bj방송사고 도박랜드. 한동훈 외 또 누구를 호명했는지도 밝히시라. 21일 방송된 sbs 에서 유현주심이영 분가 입덧으로 제대로 음식을 먹지 못하자 장성태김정현 분가 걱정하는 마음을 드러냈다.

냥뇽녕냥 눈모으기 724 likes, 22 comments adg7_official on novem 🎙️홍옥, 명월, 유월 출동. 방송 사고가 난 즉시 음악캠프 mc인 신지와 엠씨몽이 사과하고, 자막에도 본의 아닌 사고로 물의를 빚어 진심으로 죄송하다는 문구가 나갔으나. 부산 광안리 단팥빵 맛집 홍옥당 냄새맡고 방문한 후기. 아프리카 tv 강릉 주문진 출신 베스트 bj이다. Org › post › 12448bj홍옥 제로투 꼭노 bj방송사고 도박랜드.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.