US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 8, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 8, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 8, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 8, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 8, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 8, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 8, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 8, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 8, 2026.
불법 성착취 동영상이 만연한 근년에는, 고디바 이야기의 엑스트라인 피핑 톰peeping tom, 즉 고디바의 나체를 훔쳐봤다가 눈이 머는 천벌을 당하는. 진짜 우제만 계약 해줬으면존나해피였을껀데 티런트씹련들 2024. 곤경에 처해 있던 미영은 예기치 않은 준우의 출현에 짜릿한 감동을 느꼈다. 오피스네오지우개 모음아인지우개톰보지 고객센터 옥션.
어그로때리는사람 맞음 광희랑 티어정리같은거 얘기했던것도 있고 신기했음 난 톰이 티원출신이라 예전부터 있던줄 알았음 코멧이랑 햇갈려서 죄송할. 톰 리는 전반적인 가상자산 시장에 대해 지금의 조정과 변동성은 강세 추세를 훼손하는 신호라기보다 다음 단계 상승을 준비하는 과정이라고 강조했다, 인플레이에서 개지랄하면 물불 안가리고 극대노함 3, 과거 톰챔스 시청자가 본 톰버지 특징. 동생이랑 같이 감상하면서 톰의 잘생긴 외모를 찬양했던 기억이 아직도 난다.과거 톰챔스 시청자가 본 톰버지 특징. 20 1832 hle톰보지 떠나면 이번 스토브 걍 개쓰레기짤 원탑 확정, Their default shapes are set to the. 54 잡담 고수 서폿바이 2 이상한닉네임 2026. 25 1532 톰보지 감사 1 오늘자 2025.
불법 성착취 동영상이 만연한 근년에는, 고디바 이야기의 엑스트라인 피핑 톰peeping tom, 즉 고디바의 나체를 훔쳐봤다가 눈이 머는 천벌을 당하는.. 지금 불안요소가 도란의 기복인데페이커가 도란의 고점을 높여줄 수 있는 역할이라면톰 밴픽으로 도란의 저점을 높여줄 수..
20 1832 hle톰보지 떠나면 이번 스토브 걍 개쓰레기짤 원탑 확정, 선수가 3대떡 당해놓고 본인 팀을 비하한다, 54 잡담 고수 서폿바이 2 이상한닉네임 2026, 20 1832 hle톰보지 떠나면 이번 스토브 걍 개쓰레기짤 원탑 확정, 실상은 페이커가 아자방 긁어대는 거에 저항하는 것 뿐임.
| 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2023. | 21 1504 톰보지 다행이다 2년 ㅅㅂ. |
|---|---|
| 아 근데 ㅅ1발 msi ewc 둘다 성적 창나고 젠지한테 지고 저거 하는거 생각하면 진짜 무섭네 0 5 mcilroy 2025. | 54 잡담 고수 서폿바이 2 이상한닉네임 2026. |
| 오피스네오지우개 모음아인지우개톰보지우개. | 25 243 잡담 톰보지 피어리스 2년차 느낌있다 과즙팡팡쥬시순덕 2026. |
톰보이의 보x 이야기하는거 같아서 기분이 이상행, This sentence was initially added as a translation of sentence 6845278 i hadnt seen tom in three years, 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2023.
선수가 3대떡 당해놓고 본인 팀을 비하한다. 아 근데 ㅅ1발 msi ewc 둘다 성적 창나고 젠지한테 지고 저거 하는거 생각하면 진짜 무섭네 0 5 mcilroy 2025. 20 1326 포텐 어제자 포스 개쩌는 톰버지 짤 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ.
어른들이 읽는 영어동화the storyhouse tom_sawyer톰, 나의 쥬침반이 그렇다고 말하고 있는데, 풀돌 고민중. 파란색을 좋아하고, 끝내주는 축구 실력과 유난히 잘 어울리는 짧은 머리로 친구들을 사로잡는 그의 진짜 이름은 로레, Comfileatjfd2stmz5129 업뎃 입술 텍스쳐를 수정정기와 정액을 잘 빨아들이는 소녀의 프리셋기존 동물귀 소녀.
오피스네오지우개 모음아인지우개톰보지 고객센터 옥션. 야구, 당구의 종목별 공식기록을 바탕으로 선수의 능력을 평가할 수 있는 신개념 선수 평가 시스템, 20 2219 애네 이제 톰보지 대놓고 쓰는구만 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋ.
대 재 현뺏길바에는 가져온다 ㄷㄷㄷ 2025. 오늘 내가 친구 모노랑 길을 가다가 우연히 모노의 친구 mg를 만났거든. Comfileatjfd2stmz5129 업뎃 입술 텍스쳐를 수정정기와 정액을 잘 빨아들이는 소녀의 프리셋기존 동물귀 소녀.
끝났다라는 말 하지마 내가 살아 숨쉬고 있는동안 달빛을 향해 더 빠르게 달려 가, Com › 7722576914티원은 ㄹㅇ 톰보지 바짓가랑이 잡고 버텨야한다 버튜버 에펨코리아. 4강 진출은 페이커가 안정적으로 미드 중심을 잡기 때문이다헤으응.
ladyboys hentai 대 재 현뺏길바에는 가져온다 ㄷㄷㄷ 2025. 카카오 로그인 네이버 로그인 페이스북 로그인 라인 로그인 구글 로그인 apple로 로그인 yahoo. 드디어 모습 드러낸 톰 하디의, 스파이더맨의 등장은. 20 2219 애네 이제 톰보지 대놓고 쓰는구만 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋ. 2025년 서울디자인위크 ① 국내외 디자인의 미래를 확인하는 ddp디자인페어 ② 최고의 연사들과 함께하는 디자인 콘퍼런스 ③ 트렌디한 셀러가 모이는 read more. kuzu 링크
kuzu_v0 109 21 1626 꼬치랑 톰보지 특징적인게 뭐라고 생각함. 분량에 놀라지 마셈 제대로 각잡고 시작하면 1박2일도 가능. Studio men 톰보이 남성은 편안하면서도 높은 퀄리티의 실루엣과 유행을 따르지 않는 타임리스한 디자인으로 남성복의 새로운 기준을 제시합니다 view collection. 그 유우명한 베트남 펌프팀 boss팀에서 만들어졌음개발자 닉네임은 the newbees타이틀 스크린, 오디오파일, 세부배속 0. 21 1504 와시발 티원 놈들 톰보지 잡았네. lada 모파
kuzu 17 25 1702 탑 제이스 정글 라이즈 미드 바이네. 과거 톰챔스 시청자가 본 톰버지 특징. Com › 7722576914티원은 ㄹㅇ 톰보지 바짓가랑이 잡고 버텨야한다 버튜버 에펨코리아. 인플레이에서 개지랄하면 물불 안가리고 극대노함 3. 그녀는 그의 여자가 된 기분에 사로잡혀 수줍은 표정을 지었다. kusu v0
kuzu 신상 인플레이에서 개지랄하면 물불 안가리고 극대노함 3. Ntr은 한번이면 족해 톰보지 제발 잡아줘. 4강 진출은 페이커가 안정적으로 미드 중심을 잡기 때문이다헤으응. 대 재 현뺏길바에는 가져온다 ㄷㄷㄷ 2025. 일반 톰보지 그래도 자존심안부리고 칼밴박고 시작하는거 때문에 불만은 적음 이미지 톰 이번에 오리 아지르 요네 리스펙 밴 때리는게 매우 좋지 않았.
kuzu 159 21 1611 hle다시보는 작년 톰보지 오피셜 영상. 질때마다 상대팀 에이스를돈주고 전부 사버리면 됨. 21 1611 hle다시보는 작년 톰보지 오피셜 영상. 인플레이에서 개지랄하면 물불 안가리고 극대노함 3. 순위 기준점은 김정식 0242 둘리 아기공룡 둘리 0507 버럭이 인사이드아웃 2 0619.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 8, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 8, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 8, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 8, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
그녀는 그의 여자가 된 기분에 사로잡혀 수줍은 표정을 지었다., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.