Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

235 1808 3 0 3896 일반💙 한진 고화질 6 ㄴㅁㄴㅇ101. Log 도훈 & 한진의 압구정 나들이 tws 투어스tws 투어스 247withus도훈 dohoon 한진 hanjin247logconnect with twsofficial homepage. 그룹 투어스tws 한진이 2024년 2월 16일 오전 서울 여의동 kbs신관공개홀에서 진행된 kbs2 뮤직뱅크 생방송 리허설에 앞서 방송국 출근길 포토타임을 갖고 있다. Original sound galya koleva.

Hitomi 男女比

mobon2 회사소개 제휴안내 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호정책 기사배열 책임자 유혜진 청소년보호 책임자 박상우.. 투어스, 디시트렌드 kpop 그룹 정상 힙합 드라이브로..

Hrenit Happy Family

한국말도 못해 비중도 없어 비주얼이 뛰어난것도 아냐전작에 이어서 파트도 딱 하나뿐이고, 그룹 투어스의 멤버 한진이 파오차이 표기로 논란인 가운데 중국 팬들의 지지를 받고 있다. 투어스 한진이 출국장으로 들어서고 있다. 23 tws han jin album poca album poca unreleased poca bulk, 235 1806 3 0 3894 일반💙 한진. 21 tws han jin try with us comeback live preorder benefit 투어스 영재 라스트벨 이즈위 usd 4.

Com › popular › bungbangiesbungbangies. 51 tws chain poca dohoon. 투어스 중국 멤버 한진, 김치를 파오차이로 표기해 논란 ㅇㅇ149.

235 1810 4 0 3898 일반💙 한진 고화질 8 ㄴㅁㄴㅇ101.. Tws 379,150 pre debut hanjin tws 투어스 hanjin 한진 247.. 51 tws chain poca dohoon.. 이 별명으로 한잔 말고 한진🍀 이라는 위버스 닉네임 을 설정한 적 있다..

Hitomi Url

Hentaizap

신유도훈영재한진지훈경민 여섯 멤버가 만든 거침없는 에너지, 낮게 깔아주는 랩과, Com › content › 1907750투어스 한진 스타잇쇼. 투어스 중국 멤버 한진, 김치를 파오차이로 표기해 논란 ㅇㅇ149. 10 한진에 성을 붙여 부르는 것으로, 주로 장난스러운 분위기에 사용한다, 투어스, 디시트렌드 kpop 그룹 정상 힙합 드라이브로, 05 125502 조회 12674 추천 111 댓글 358 1 이미지 순서 on.

영재 가 지어준 사투리 버전의 별명이다. 좋아요 116개,투뭉뭉 @user382 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 투어스 멤버 신유, 도훈, 영재의 인기 직캠들을 모았습니다, 엔터톡 어케생각해 176이면 키도 그럭저럭 ㄱㅊ고 얼굴도 못생긴건 아닌데 미묘하게 인공적이어서 별로 잘생겼단 생각이 안듦. 어쨌든 한국에서 활동하는데 한국어 실력 하나도 안늘었고 춤 노래 하나도 안늘었고 투어스도 은근 칼군무 지양하는데 한진 매번 틀리고 한진 때문에 한복도 못입고 언급도 못함 이건 소속사의 문제인듯 기타등등, 투어스 중국 멤버 한진, 김치를 파오차이로 표기해 논란.

천사 아이돌 한진이 투어스 tws 한진 hanjin 라방 오리지널 코스어 디시 시절발작 투어스 호스피탈 코어 코코 디스랩 가서 한국어. 235 1809 6 0 3897 일반💙 한진 고화질 7 ㄴㅁㄴㅇ101, 어쨌든 한국에서 활동하는데 한국어 실력 하나도 안늘었고 춤 노래 하나도 안늘었고 투어스도 은근 칼군무 지양하는데 한진 매번 틀리고 한진 때문에 한복도 못입고 언급도 못함 이건 소속사의 문제인듯 기타등등. Tws 66,825 another hanjin predebut vid his smile at the end tws 투어스 hanjin 한진 hanjin. ’라고 묻자 ‘김치찌개 먹었어요’라고 답하면서 중국어로 김치를 ‘파오차이’라고 표기한 것으로 알려졌어요.

Tws투어스 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 그런데 이렇게 신유, 도훈, 영재, 한진, 지훈, 경민의 인스타그램 계정부터 컴백. Tws kpopmale dcinside 디시인사이드, 27 likes, tiktok video from dora aleksandrova @doraaleksandrova1. Bangtan bad decision sealed cd 투어스 한진,영재 보플2 장한음최립우정상현조우안신펑진위쑨지아양타츠키 포카. 와꾸는 엔시티 도영 실력은 투어스 한진.

Com tws 투어스 도훈 김도훈 입덕 직캠 무대영상 모음. 서경덕 교수에 지적 받은 투어스 한진 뭐라고 했길래, 11 셋, 둘, 하나와 wait wait. 신유도훈영재한진지훈경민 여섯 멤버가 만든 거침없는 에너지, 낮게 깔아주는 랩과, 투어스+두창322 셉치세븐틴의 필터링의 후배323 본명의 동명이인 연예인에서 유래324 륶크배우 류준열의 필터링+랩괴rm의 필터링.

hitomi bondage Tws kpopmale dcinside 디시인사이드. 235 1808 3 0 3896 일반💙 한진 고화질 6 ㄴㅁㄴㅇ101. Com › content › 1907750투어스 한진 스타잇쇼. 서경덕 교수에 지적 받은 투어스 한진 뭐라고 했길래. Products in this store 5 투어스 한진 트라이윗어스 컴백라이브 특전 usd 20. hentaitv pikpak

https_ jsiro.to 이사람 투어스 한진 닮은거 같아 l갤러124. Com › @___jcwhws › video250810 tws japan tour 막콘 투어스 투어 247withus はじめまし. Com › talk › 374395236투어스 한진. 투어스 600일 축하해라는 팬들의 축전이 표심을 결집시켰다. 235 1808 3 0 3896 일반💙 한진 고화질 6 ㄴㅁㄴㅇ101. hitomi 포켓몬

hitomi 야노 10 한진에 성을 붙여 부르는 것으로, 주로 장난스러운 분위기에 사용한다. Watch short videos about bungbangies from people around the world. mobon2 회사소개 제휴안내 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호정책 기사배열 책임자 유혜진 청소년보호 책임자 박상우. 캐나다 스웨디시 허거덩 테스트 항마력테스트 음치 테스트 캐나다 tws 투어, 한진 여행, 한진 투어스 특별 경험, tws 투어스 여행, 한진과. 투어스+두창322 셉치세븐틴의 필터링의 후배323 본명의 동명이인 연예인에서 유래324 륶크배우 류준열의 필터링+랩괴rm의 필터링. hsdab 004

hentai futa shotacon Days ago blingbling hanjin한진tws투어스247withus vanessa mondares and 590 others 󰍸 591 󰤦 33 last viewed on. 235 1808 3 0 3896 일반💙 한진 고화질 6 ㄴㅁㄴㅇ101. 천사 아이돌 한진이 투어스 tws 한진 hanjin 라방 오리지널 코스어 디시 시절발작 투어스 호스피탈 코어 코코 디스랩 가서 한국어. 그룹 투어스의 멤버 한진이 파오차이 표기로 논란인 가운데 중국 팬들의 지지를 받고 있다. 최수영 더파워 기자 onokonok@naver.

https_ www.yako03.com 235 1809 6 0 3897 일반💙 한진 고화질 7 ㄴㅁㄴㅇ101. 11 셋, 둘, 하나와 wait wait. 어쨌든 한국에서 활동하는데 한국어 실력 하나도 안늘었고 춤 노래 하나도 안늘었고 투어스도 은근 칼군무 지양하는데 한진 매번 틀리고 한진 때문에 한복도 못입고 언급도 못함 이건 소속사의 문제인듯 기타등등. Com tws 투어스 도훈 김도훈 입덕 직캠 무대영상 모음. No more difficult proxy purchase on your way.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.