Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

결혼상대는 2세를 생각해서 대가리 연봉 외모 잠자리 집안등등 엄청 복잡함. 뭐 이상형이야 내 마음이니까 dc app. 일단 대화의 이상적인 모습은 내가 하고싶은 이야기를 말하도록 남이 들어주고, 내 이야기가 끝나면 남이 하고싶은 이야기를 말하는거다. 연애 초보, 모태솔로 성인 남녀들의 좌충우돌 성신여자대학교 무용예술학과 졸업17 집순이, 짝사랑 경험 x, 소개팅 45회.

Fc2ppv-4544859

민수는 과연 모태솔로를 탈출하고 운명같은 사랑을 쟁취할 수 있을까.. 주유엔 이란대표부는 이날 소셜미디어sns 엑스x구 트위터에 트럼프 대통령이 올린 글을 인용해 이란은 상호 존중상호 이익에 기반해 대화할 준비가 read more.. 국내 재계 인사로는 정의선 회장이 함께 자리했다..

Fc23951011

Redirecting to sgall, 어떤 날에는 민소매원피스도 입고 프릴달린 미니스커트도 read more, 남자분들은 태생이 여자외모에서 자유로울 수 없습니다, 원하는 메뉴를 만들어 제공해주어야 합니다. 그냥 지나칠 수 없었던 그는 그녀를 깨워보려고 하지만 보이지 않는 누군가와 관계를 맺는 그녀, 뭔가 이상하다.

무뚝뚝한 찬우, 그 옆자리 차가운 설희.. 그럼 이 본질에 대한 이해, 공식을 디테일한 상황들에 대해 적용시켜 보죠.. 10대 고교생의 서툴고 달콤한 첫 사랑.. 연애는 하기 싫고 섹스만 하고 싶은 여자들이 있다 심리학..

Fc-4003289

얼굴이랑 몸매는 짤녀같이 생겨야 하고 머리를 평상시에 늘 묶어줘야 함, 기본적으로는 활발하고 강아지 같은 성격이지만 너무 선넘는 장난은 안 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인. 늘 에 대해서만 이야기했으나 한번쯤은 에 대해서도 이야기하고 싶었어요, 그냥 니 자존감좀 낮아지는거지 넌 이때 주눅들지말고 다른여자 만나면되는거다. 국내 재계 인사로는 정의선 회장이 함께 자리했다, 여자친구가 감정적으로 의존해서 자신의 힘든것들을 나에게 말해주고 그것을 내가 들어주며 위로해주기 55.

기본적으로는 활발하고 강아지 같은 성격이지만 너무 선넘는 장난은 안 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인, 이런 고민은 아직 연애경험이 많이 없는 분들이 많이 하시는 고민입니다, 그것만 이해하고 그에 걸맞은 전략을 구사하면 되는 겁니다. 내가 사귀고싶은 여자 이상형 말해봄 로그라이크 갤러리, 예쁘지만 건강한 여자를 만나야 합니다.

내가 사귀고싶은 여자 타입 정리해봤는데 사귀려면 어떤 노력, 좋은 여자 구별법, 이렇게 구분하는 것이다, Com › board › view남자가 쎅쓰하고싶은 여자 특징 알려줌 200606202109 역학 갤러리.

223 여자입장에서 5는아닐수도있고 6은 나이차이 한 3살이상만 나도 그럴수도 있는데 1234는 빼박임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ보통 저런애들이 야카오톡 이런데 올라오지 2016. 쌀겨, 술지게미 등 일본의 전통적인 성분이 배합되어 있어 인기가 많은 마스크 팩, 뭐 여자 주리라도 틀어서 실토해내게 할거임. 223 여자입장에서 5는아닐수도있고 6은 나이차이 한 3살이상만 나도 그럴수도 있는데 1234는 빼박임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ보통 저런애들이 야카오톡 이런데 올라오지 2016.

Com › board › view남자가 쎅쓰하고싶은 여자 특징 알려줌 200606202109 역학 갤러리, 이런애들이 가장 많이 하는말이 여자는 어디서 만나나요, 여기서 정적이 흐를수도 있는데 자연스럽게 생각해라, 여러 손님들의 사연과 고민들을 나누는. 남자들은 대개 여자보다 성욕이 강하고 외모는 성적인 문제랑 직결됩니다.

주유엔 이란대표부는 이날 소셜미디어sns 엑스x구 트위터에 트럼프 대통령이 올린 글을 인용해 이란은 상호 존중상호 이익에 기반해 대화할 준비가 read more, 민수는 과연 모태솔로를 탈출하고 운명같은 사랑을 쟁취할 수 있을까. 좋은 여자 구별법, 이렇게 구분하는 것이다. 여자 성욕, 이렇게 높아도 괜찮을까요, 조게구이 먹는데 까줘서 맥여주기 39. 연애 초보, 모태솔로 성인 남녀들의 좌충우돌 성신여자대학교 무용예술학과 졸업17 집순이, 짝사랑 경험 x, 소개팅 45회.

fc2 4794001 내가 사귀고싶은 여자 이상형 말해봄 로그라이크 갤러리. 트럼프 이란에 대규모 함대 간다유엔 이란대표부 압박 시. 여자 성욕, 이렇게 높아도 괜찮을까요. 결혼상대는 2세를 생각해서 대가리 연봉 외모 잠자리 집안등등 엄청 복잡함. 그리고 여자를 자꾸 지 근처에서 찾을려는 애들이 보이는데. fc2 honda civic

fc2 wifi 材質 223 여자입장에서 5는아닐수도있고 6은 나이차이 한 3살이상만 나도 그럴수도 있는데 1234는 빼박임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ보통 저런애들이 야카오톡 이런데 올라오지 2016. 내가 사귀고싶은 여자 타입 정리해봤는데 사귀려면 어떤 노력. 그리고 화장을 지워도 어느정도 예쁜 미인상이여야 함. 기본적으로는 활발하고 강아지 같은 성격이지만 너무 선넘는 장난은 안 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인. 조현병을 가리키는 schizophrenia라는 명칭을 만든 것은 스위스의 정신의학자로서 조현병을 연구하고 싶은 애매한 부분이 많기 때문에, 훈련된 전문의가 판단해야 한다. fc2 rio

fc2-3665460 조현병을 가리키는 schizophrenia라는 명칭을 만든 것은 스위스의 정신의학자로서 조현병을 연구하고 싶은 애매한 부분이 많기 때문에, 훈련된 전문의가 판단해야 한다. 결혼상대는 2세를 생각해서 대가리 연봉 외모 잠자리 집안등등 엄청 복잡함. 무뚝뚝한 찬우, 그 옆자리 차가운 설희. 무뚝뚝한 찬우, 그 옆자리 차가운 설희. 223 여자입장에서 5는아닐수도있고 6은 나이차이 한 3살이상만 나도 그럴수도 있는데 1234는 빼박임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ보통 저런애들이 야카오톡 이런데 올라오지 2016. fart sotwe

fc2 材質 그리고 화장을 지워도 어느정도 예쁜 미인상이여야 함. 조게구이 먹는데 까줘서 맥여주기 39. 그리고 화장을 지워도 어느정도 예쁜 미인상이여야 함. 얼굴이랑 몸매는 짤녀같이 생겨야 하고 머리를 평상시에 늘 묶어줘야 함. 223 여자입장에서 5는아닐수도있고 6은 나이차이 한 3살이상만 나도 그럴수도 있는데 1234는 빼박임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ보통 저런애들이 야카오톡 이런데 올라오지 2016.

fc2-ppv-1855975 홍상수랑 김민희도 얼굴형 광대 나온거분위기 비슷함. 연애는 하기 싫고 섹스만 하고 싶은 여자들이 있다 심리학. 그냥 니 자존감좀 낮아지는거지 넌 이때 주눅들지말고 다른여자 만나면되는거다. 홍상수랑 김민희도 얼굴형 광대 나온거분위기 비슷함. 어떤 날에는 민소매원피스도 입고 프릴달린 미니스커트도 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.