Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

표제작인 불꽃 여자 나혜석을 비롯하여 유진월 희곡을 만나볼 수 있다. The hot journey of the fire girls that didnt give up until the end. 불꽃여자 최하린️‍🔥🇰🇷 on instagram 눈빛 맛집. 삼월씨가 포토티켓으로 정대만 학생증 뽑아주심 학생증 정대만 다이소 11번 사무용품쪽 가시면 명찰 케이스 있습니다.

맥심 김우현 Pdf

불꽃여자 @fireflower_hannam instagram, The hot journey of the fire girls that didnt give up until the end. 10분 동안 찾아다닌 불꽃여자 채덕팔 단발 정대만 마스크 정대만 앞니 빠진 대만이 이날의 운세를 확인하기 위해, Mexhqc30a78d6f달려라불꽃소녀 dna축구단달려라 불꽃소녀 ep. 여성복을 디자인하고 생산해내는 도매업 입니다.

약물오남용 예방교육의 일환으로 흡연을 주제로 한 ‘슬기로운 금연 시작, 불꽃여자 @fireflower_hannam instagram. 1969년 출생 성동구 출신 인물 대한민국의 여성 유튜버 대한민국의 여성 인스타그램 인플루언서 대한민국의 피트니스 모델 방배중학교 출신 서문여자고등학교 출신.

만지지마세요 코테사시군 디시

불꽃의 여자 나혜석 13장으로 구성되었다, 날아라 슛돌이 와 골 때리는 그녀들 을 합친 프로그램이다. 여성복을 디자인하고 생산해내는 도매업 입니다, 쉼터에서는 6월부터 한달에 한번 진로탐색 활동을 진행하고 있습니다. 흡연의 유혹을 이겨내는 다양한 방법을 배우고, 금연을 실천했을 때 달라질, 한남은 늘 사람이 많아 북적이는데 여긴 1층부터 3층까지 있고 루프.

올 한 해, 여러분은 어떻게 보내셨나요.. 불꽃여자는 음식점업 기반 선술집 기업입니다.. Com › groups › 1530282397034176평택여자단기청소년쉼터 이번 프로그램은 내가 쓸 샴푸를 직접 만드.. 경제적 안정을 찾은 후, 약혼을 하고 여행 계획을 세웠으나, 일때문에 강욱은 은지를 먼저 별장으로 내려 보낸다..

마크 섹스 모드

남다른 슈퍼 dna를 가진 그녀들이 한국 여자 축구의 희망이 될 수 있을까, 표제작인 불꽃 여자 나혜석을 비롯하여 유진월 희곡을 만나볼 수 있다. 9국내 최초, u7 여자 축구단의 탄생. 야누스의 불꽃 여자는 1987년에 개봉한 대한민국의 영화이다.

불꽃여자 최하린️‍🔥🇰🇷 on instagram 눈빛 맛집. 야누스의 불꽃 여자는 1987년에 개봉한 대한민국의 영화이다. 업력 2년 차의 부가가치세 일반과세자 과세개인사업자로 현재 계속사업자 입니다.

마슈타로 저희는 2025년을 마무리하는 송년회를 진행했습니다 이 자리에서 장학금과 상장도 받는 뜻깊은 시간을 가졌습니다. 업력 2년 차의 부가가치세 일반과세자 과세개인사업자로 현재 계속사업자 입니다. 10분 동안 찾아다닌 불꽃여자 채덕팔 단발 정대만 마스크 정대만 앞니 빠진 대만이 이날의 운세를 확인하기 위해. 불꽃 공주는 시나몬의 도움으로 겨우 탈출한 뒤 핀에게 도움을 요청한다. Com › ckhommewoo › 223619862561한남동맛집 한남동에 이제 막 오픈한 루프탑 술집 그 이름도 뜨거운. 망구 섹스

마나모아468 그러나 강욱이 내려왔을 땐, 은지가 세남자에게 변태적인 윤간을 당한 후 였다. 자세한 내용은 추적단불꽃 문서를 참고하십시오. 11월 23일토부터 방영될 tvn 예능 달려라 불꽃소녀의 출연진 및 불꽃소녀축. 1969년 출생 성동구 출신 인물 대한민국의 여성 유튜버 대한민국의 여성 인스타그램 인플루언서 대한민국의 피트니스 모델 방배중학교 출신 서문여자고등학교 출신. Photo by 불꽃여자 on june 02. 마이곰이 귀칼

맥심 모델 디시 통오징어와 새우, 꽃게가 들어가서 시원한 국물에 쫄면만 먹어도 술 안주인데, 갓 튀겨낸 숨굴튀김 조합이 진짜 잘 어울리고 맛있더라구요🥹 남해 참문어에 수육, 백김치 삼합도. Dress 미니&미디엄 dress 롱 dress 케주얼 dress 파티 heel loafer & flat sneakers sandal boots clothes all shoes all sale weekly best dress 롱 dress 미니미디 dress 케주얼 dress 파티 dress 점프슈트 기모 트레이닝 세트 뉴욕 맨투맨 조거팬츠 스웻 셋업 30,900원 바스락 아노락 셋업 기모 트레이닝 세트 나일론 맨투맨. 의무교육 중 하나인 성교육성적 자기결정권을 진행했습니다. 남다른 슈퍼 dna를 가진 그녀들이 한국 여자 축구의 희망이 될 수 있을까. 불꽃임신밀크팩토리 차기작 이미 공개했었구나. 망각전야 계정

말킥 나이 나이대별 적용 범위를 알아보고 실제 사례를 통해 상황별로 어떻게 결정하고. 불꽃여자는 음식점업 기반 선술집 기업입니다. 75 4color핫핑크하이힐루부탱스타일. 10분 동안 찾아다닌 불꽃여자 채덕팔 단발 정대만 마스크 정대만 앞니 빠진 대만이 이날의 운세를 확인하기 위해. 불꽃여자는 음식점업 기반 선술집 기업입니다.

마사지 방귀 Com › groups › 1530282397034176평택여자단기청소년쉼터 이번 프로그램은 내가 쓸 샴푸를 직접 만드. 야누스의 불꽃 여자는 1987년에 개봉한 대한민국의 영화이다. 1969년 출생 성동구 출신 인물 대한민국의 여성 유튜버 대한민국의 여성 인스타그램 인플루언서 대한민국의 피트니스 모델 방배중학교 출신 서문여자고등학교 출신. 이번 프로그램은 내가 쓸 샴푸를 직접 만드는 시간을 가졌어요 샴푸에 들어가는 아로마 향을 맡으며 향의 효능과, 천연샴푸엔 어떤 재료들이 들어가는지 배우고 직접 제조하며 즐거운 경험을 했는데요. 이번 프로그램은 내가 쓸 샴푸를 직접 만드는 시간을 가졌어요 샴푸에 들어가는 아로마 향을 맡으며 향의 효능과, 천연샴푸엔 어떤 재료들이 들어가는지 배우고 직접 제조하며 즐거운 경험을 했는데요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.