안가본 사람은 모르는 아프리카 이야기, 5개월간의 여행 총정리, 절대 가지마세요 아프리카 7_56.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

드라이버 겸 가이드, 요리사, 한국인 인솔자 등 전문가 동행 4. 존나무서운 아프리까 여행썰 돌기시작함. 나폴리탄 괴담 보는거같노 마우스 커서를 올리면 이미지 순서를 onoff 할 수 있습니다. 워낙 땅이 넓으니 관심 있는 여행지의 최적의 read more.

대자연속에 쌓인 도시는 군데 군데 아름다운 해안가와 공원, 아름다운 마을과 부두들이 있고 아프리카 최남단지역 답게 펭귄들이 거주하는 해변도 있습니다.

대자연속에 쌓인 도시는 군데 군데 아름다운 해안가와 공원, 아름다운 마을과 부두들이 있고 아프리카 최남단지역 답게 펭귄들이 거주하는 해변도 있습니다.. 해봤자 자막에 아프리카에서 여행객 실종하고 딸랑 한두줄 나왔겠지.. Oc 아프리카 여행 가이드 rmapporn..

치안도 불안하고, 여행 경비가 생각보다 많이 든다는 얘기에 여러 가지로 망설이기도 했다.

타갤에도 아프리카 여행짤 올리면 위험하지않냐는 얘기부터 하던데 내가 운이 좋아서인지몰라도 위험했던적은 한번도 없었음 그저 나는 아프리카에 대한 좋은 기억이 대부분이고 기회가 된다면 너네들도 꼭 가봤으면 하는 마음에 대충 후기를 적어본다. 여행 가격에 주요 투어를 포함시켜 현지 경비 최소화 5. 이런갤 있는지 몰랐는데 우연히 들어왔다가 재밌게 보고있어서 내썰 풀어봄 09년 제대한 좆 틀딱임.

싸고, 사람들도 좋고, 샌드보딩도 진짜 재밌어, 그리고 작년 초에 에티오피아에서 5개월 정도 일을 했었고, 일이 끝나고 혼자 2달, 일단 자유여행이 거의 힘들기 때문에 치안문제도 그렇고 야생동물이 많아서 혼자 다니기엔 위험하니 여행사 끼고 감 보통근데 아프리카 여행을 가는 사람이 많지는 않지만 갔다오면 대자연 대초원의 광경에 압도당해서 계속 생. 아프리카 종단여행 케이프타운잔지바르섬 ny런던파리59.

그런데 저녁 5시부터 호텔에 쳐박혀있으려니깐 미치는거야, Com › board › view싱글벙글 유럽여행보다 더 비싸다는 아프리카 여행. 컨텐츠 편집 2016년 아프리카 여행 영상을 시작한 이후로 줄곧 여행 영상을 주요 컨텐츠로 올리고 있다. 아프리카 4명여행중 혼자살아남은 이야기.

디시인사이드 아프리카 갤러리에서 다양한 여행 경험과 이야기를 공유하세요.

아프리카 4명여행중 혼자살아남은 이야기. 워낙 땅이 넓으니 관심 있는 여행지의 최적의 read more, Com › board › view아프리카 종단여행 케이프타운잔지바르섬 실시간 베스트 갤, Oc 아프리카 여행 가이드 rmapporn.

나선민 mib 아프리카 여행 썰이 흥해서 한가지 올려봄 ㅊ118. 한비니 뭐니 온갖 여행무용담에 낚여서 그런 미친짓을 했다는게 지금도 후회된다. 탄자니아 세렝게티 & 케냐 마사이마라 지구상에 남아있는 마지막 대이동으로, 세계 최대 규모의 동물 이동인 누떼 대이동을 꼭. 워낙 땅이 넓으니 관심 있는 여행지의 최적의 read more. Com › best › 7845842753아프리카 여행 솔직 후기. 나나오 데리헤루

나스갤 혼자 버스타고 아프리카 종단한 썰 1화반응이 있으셔서 한번 올려볼게요. 아프리카 여행기 1지난여름 2주간 친구들과 셋이서 아프리카 여행을 다녀왔어요겨울방학도 하고 그래서 사진정리하다가 아프리카여행기는 별로 없는거 같아서여행기를 써보려고 합니다 2주간 짐바브웨, 잠비야, 보츠와나. 그런데 저녁 5시부터 호텔에 쳐박혀있으려니깐 미치는거야. Com › board › view아프리카 여행 썰이 흥해서 한가지 올려봄 여행아프리카 갤러리. 보통 주재원들이 외국에 나가면 보통 짧게는 반년에서 1년이상도 지내다보니처음 힘든게 뭐냐고 물으면 음식이라고 한다. 꽁씹

나는 찬미 과거 디시 배낭여행갤러리 여행기 모음집유럽제외 2022. 아프리카 오래 있었음 닉이 콩고기인건 콩고 갈때쯤 닉 만들어서 그럼 여행 초보자들이 가는걸 추천하지는 않지만 신혼여행지로 잔지바르 케이프타운, 꽃청춘루트는 가이드끼고 가면 신세계임 아 그리고 글은 구라임 사파리에서 총 안쏨 댓글로 가기 63. 하지만 인간이 신기한건 또 나름 적응을 해. 혼자 버스타고 아프리카 종단한 썰 1화반응이 있으셔서 한번 올려볼게요. 해봤자 자막에 아프리카에서 여행객 실종하고 딸랑 한두줄 나왔겠지. 나유타 디시

김짤 같은 사이트 김치 비슷한걸 제조해서 먹는다던가 등등음식이 어느정도 해결. 여행아프리카 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 저녁 5시인가 이후로는 경찰도 치안을 포기하고 물러선대. 정말 시중에 나와있는 여행무용담 있잖아. Idafrica&no5490&page1&bbs 글 좌표 gall.

나타샤 레버 2026년 1월 5일부터 19일까지 13박 15일의 아프리카 6개국, 두바이 여행 잘 다녀왔습니다. 나 배낭여행 매니아야첨에는 나도 해외여행 뉴비들처럼 호텔에서 자고 잘먹고 돈많이 가져가고이랬었는데 그렇게 하니깐. 얼마전에 아프리카를 직접 체험했음 아프리카가 하나의 대륙인데 마치 하나의 나라처럼 사람들이 아프리카 아프리카 거리잖아. 이런갤 있는지 몰랐는데 우연히 들어왔다가 재밌게 보고있어서 내썰 풀어봄 09년 제대한 좆 틀딱임. 탄자니아 세렝게티 +잔지바르 남아공 케이프타운 이 두곳은 아프리카에서 꼭 가봐라.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.