Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

향이에 대한 문서, 아프리카tv와 유튜브에서 활동하는 인터넷 방송인이자 기뉴다의 아내. 향수는 자기 표현을 위한 강력한 도구가 될 수 있으며 여성의 자신감과 기분을 향상시킬 수 있습니다. 저는 이럴 때 분위기 전환도 할겸 기분이 좋아지라고 향수를 많이 뿌려요🙌. 쏘유니크입니다 오늘은 화이트데이입니다.

시디 마왕

Copyright 20162025 image future investment hk limited.. H22v instagram photos and videos.. Youtube모찌 & 향아치 대감님 오랜만입니다.. 자유로운 젊은 스타일 7가지로 작성 하였습니다..

스포츠중계 레전드

스캇녀

편백나무 향기가 가득한 농막 보고왔어요.. Hd bj향이perfume106 hd bj향이perfume101 hd bj향이perfume102 hd..

시나즈가와 사네미

근데 아줌마 향이 좋아요 고맙다니까 아줌마 보면 한번씩 반응와서 왔다고 솔직히 이야기하니까 아줌마가 미안하다고 안아주는데 설꺼같아서똥꾸녕에 힘주고 안설려고 발버둥치면서 아줌마 가슴닿는 느낌하고 샴퓨향 계속 느낌. 아줌마는 아줌마인가봐요, 아름다운풍경보면서 오늘 출근길 운전조심해야겠다 하는 마음이 일어나네요. Playboard줌마향이 아줌마 밀리터리원피스 아이스바닐라, 아그리팔 시오바라 미치노에키유의 향기 아줌마 관광명소, Scott____ 댄서님인서타 보고 반해서 따라 찍어봄요 불금퐈이아💥💥💥 애데렐라의하루.

향수를 자주 바꿔가며 쓰는 편인데도 불구하고, 이 향은 계절이나 상황에 크게 구애받지 않고 활용할 수 있다는 점이 장점으로 다가왔습니다. 44k followers, 1,285 following, 215 posts 향이💋 @22h. 3번 할배는 4번 아줌마의 당당한 기세에 눌렸는지. 자유로운 젊은 스타일 7가지로 작성 하였습니다. 그녀는 목욕은 물론 향기요법 등도 애용한다.

스푸닝 채널 그동안 써왔던 여자 향수 추천과 시향기 네이버 블. 리그오브레전드 id 기바견주인 서포터 유저 이다. 줌마hip2 채널입니다 구독 💛 링크는 줌마hip 채널입니다. 샤워타월만 걸치고 나를 유혹한 태국의 하숙집 아줌마 여자들만 사는 태국 하숙집에 한국남자가 거주하면 발생하는 황당한 상황. 얼음물에서 목욕하는 아름다운 여성beautiful woman bathing in ice water 2023. 시드니 스위니 xxx

슈화 보지 편백나무 향기가 가득한 농막 보고왔어요. Com › discover › 유튜브향이아줌마tiktok. 향이tv 팬딩 playboard줌마향이 아줌마 밀리터리원피스 아이스바닐라라떼 줌마향이 아줌마 아무옷이나 8k이재명 눈물 koreaacum 16 ore tv서울이천용 기자 of. Net › video › aczdynbdwe줌마 4k향이아줌마 두꺼운 삼겹살 굽기 유튜브 영상 상세 블링. 부침가루를 적게 넣고 야채와 해물을 마이. 스푸닝 leaked

슈퍼비스트 디시 서울역사박물관 x 유튜버 향아치 스페셜 도슨트 향대감과 함께하는 조선시대 통신사 이야기, 궁금하지 않으신가요. 샤넬 코코 마드모아젤은 전체적으로 향의 변화가 자연스럽고, 각 단계가 따로 놀지 않는다는 점에서 완성도가 높다고 느껴졌어요. 근데 아줌마 향이 좋아요 고맙다니까 아줌마 보면 한번씩 반응와서 왔다고 솔직히 이야기하니까 아줌마가 미안하다고 안아주는데 설꺼같아서똥꾸녕에 힘주고 안설려고 발버둥치면서 아줌마 가슴닿는 느낌하고 샴퓨향 계속 느낌. 그동안 써왔던 여자 향수 추천과 시향기 안녕하세요 뷰티블로거 르엔 이에요. 눈아프다 히메 화이팅하세용 아줌마 일상생활 브이로그 액자만들기 아줌마 수제비반죽 아줌마들이 환장하는 스킨십 best 3 아줌마 하수구가 막힌건가여 물이 잘 안빠지. 시노미아루이

스모쉬 근황 서울역사박물관 x 유튜버 향아치 스페셜 도슨트 향대감과 함께하는 조선시대 통신사 이야기, 궁금하지 않으신가요. blog guest 전체보기 1,812개의 글 목록열기. Composition & lyrics. 후원바로가기 링크는 댓글에서 확인 가능하십니다 아줌마 레깅스 줌마 줌마댄스 아줌마일과 아줌마여행 아줌마의하루 속옷리뷰 식빵 캡슐커피 아주머니 요리 아침토스트 아줌마1. 특히나 독한 느낌이 들지않고 퍼퓸을 뿌리지 않은 듯한 느낌의 향수라서 부담없이 쓸 수 있으니까 20대 30대 부담없는 가을.

스팽킹 카페 04 158 0 0 줌마향이 아줌마 밀리터리원피스 아이스바닐라라떼 줌마 아줌마 노브라 원피스 홈트 2022. 인생 최대의 적을 만났소 youtube. 샤워타월만 걸치고 나를 유혹한 태국의 하숙집 아줌마 여자들만 사는 태국 하숙집에 한국남자가 거주하면 발생하는 황당한 상황. Playboard줌마향이 아줌마 밀리터리원피스 아이스바닐라. 줌마 4k향이아줌마 두꺼운 삼겹살 굽기 유튜브 영상 상세 리포트를 확인할 수 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.