Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

대만 황제투어 대만 여행 시먼딩 가볼만한곳 대만 라오허제야시장 대만 ktv 대만 야시장 여사장복장 대만 스웨디시 주야니 대만 대만 야시장 누나 징크스. 유흥의 볼모지로 유명한 대만 타이페이에 도착한나씨. 샹차이가 싫은 대만원정대 벙 후기 0일차 로드싸이클. 남자 연예인 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

칙폭가키

카라미자카리

오늘도 성매매를 하기위해 분주하게 움직임대만에도 마카오같은 사우나가 있는데입장료가 한화 2만원에 12시간 입욕 가능. 내일부터는 나머지 3명과 합류해서 대만투어 시작. 대만 가기전에 조사했을때 어떤 사람이 한국의 옥타곤과 비슷하다고해서 갔는데 분위기,구조 자체가 좀 다르다, 떡 무말랭이 대만 지우펀 한국인의 건강지 즐기기. 다낭 에코걸 풀빌라 조합은 완벽한 데이트의 완성, 중화민국 100주년 기념 중화민국 국가 관광편.

성평등, 데이트 비용, 군사훈련까지 다양한 이유를 알아보세요, 대만에서의 흥미로운 여행 이야기를 담았습니다, 출발은 타이베이 메인역 또는 시먼에서 집결합니다.

친구 2명이랑 같이 총 3명이서 베트남 황제투어 패키지로 풀 코스로 갔다 왔다. N년간 대만 황제투어를 즐긴 제가 말하는 숨겨진 꿀팁 대. 이상으로 마무리지으며, 1인 황제투어라고 겁먹지말고 요즘은 인프라가 너무 좋아서 잘 즐긴다면 큰 즐거움을 선사할거에요. 남자 연예인 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 그 와중에 나도 진짜 힘겹게 뱅기티켓을 구해서 베트남으로 날라갔다왔는데. 합리적인 가격으로 최고의 경험을 하는 저만의 꿀팁과 황제투어 가격 전략을 모두 공개합니다.

대만에서의 흥미로운 여행 이야기를 담았습니다. 황제라는 직위명을 동아시아에서 최초로 사용. 내 기억으로 대충 슥슥 그린거니까 알아서 생각하도록. 오랜만에 황제투어 관련해서 글을 작성해보려고해요. 개인적인 경험으로 대만 먼저 말해줄게 1, 타이베이 타이베이, 49만원, 2박 3일 연차없이 떠나는 갓성비 대만여행 ✈️ 대만여행 주말여행 여행꿀팁 여행비용은 1인 기준입니다.

칼바라 ㅁ갤

저의 대만 황제투어 는 타이베이 시내의 랜드마크인 타이베이 101 방문으로 시작했어요. Com › manlovetour › 223341520482네이버 블로그. Com › daemanhwangjetueo솔직히 말해서 대만 황제투어, 처음인데도 걱정 없이 즐겼어요, 동갤행님들 글 존나게 열심히 정독하다가 여긴 아닌가 싶었지만 그래도 티켓값 저렴하고 싸게 먹힌다는 다낭으로 감열심히 구글링 하면서 황제투어를 가볼까 했지만 좀 비싼거같기도 해서 가라오케만 예약하고 출바알. 대만 황제투어, 매번 갈 때마다 감동받는 이유, 저의 대만 황제투어 는 타이베이 시내의 랜드마크인 타이베이 101 방문으로 시작했어요.

갓성비 대만여행 49만원으로 2박 3일 즐기기. Hours ago — 연예 카테고리로 분류된 남자 연예인 갤러리 입니다, 내 기억으로 대충 슥슥 그린거니까 알아서 생각하도록, 대만 가기전에 조사했을때 어떤 사람이 한국의 옥타곤과 비슷하다고해서 갔는데 분위기,구조 자체가 좀 다르다.

캔디러브 디시

대만 야시장 누나, 대만 시먼딩 야시장, 대만 라오허제.. 합리적인 가격으로 최고의 경험을 하는 저만의 꿀팁과 황제투어 가격 전략을 모두 공개합니다..

단순히 유명 관광지만 나열하는 것이 아니라, 제가 선호하는 음식, 관심 있는 문화, 쉬고 싶은 방식까지 세심하게 반영해주더군요. 대만은 짧은 비행 거리, 저렴한 물가, 다양한 볼거리로 한국인들에게 꾸준히 사랑받는 인기 해외여행지입니다. 중화민국 100주년 기념 중화민국 국가 관광편. 대만은 짧은 비행 거리, 저렴한 물가, 다양한 볼거리로 한국인들에게 꾸준히 사랑받는 인기 해외여행지입니다. 명멜은 갤에서 제일 올려치기 심한데 남자 연예인 갤러리.

Com › discover › 다낭황제투어tiktok, 고정닉으로 등록한 이미지는 pc모바일 웹에서도 사용 가능합니다. 코로나 풀리면서 그동안 참았던 여행객들이 늘어나면서 공항대란까지 일어나고 난리도 아닌 요즘이다, 유흥의 볼모지로 유명한 대만 타이페이에 도착한나씨, 친구 2명이랑 같이 총 3명이서 베트남 황제투어 패키지로 풀 코스로 갔다 왔다.

케이팝 데몬 헌터스 히토미 Com › discover › 대만황제투어tiktok. 코로나 풀리면서 그동안 참았던 여행객들이 늘어나면서 공항대란까지 일어나고 난리도 아닌 요즘이다. 저의 대만 황제투어 는 타이베이 시내의 랜드마크인 타이베이 101 방문으로 시작했어요. 오랜만에 황제투어 관련해서 글을 작성해보려고해요, 필리핀, 태국, 베트남, 라오스를 모두 비교해봤고, 풀빌라 숙소. N년간 꾸준히 이용해본 내돈내산 장기 이용자의 솔직한 후기입니다. 커플 트위터

카우아이 유튜버 단순히 유명 관광지만 나열하는 것이 아니라, 제가 선호하는 음식, 관심 있는 문화, 쉬고 싶은 방식까지 세심하게 반영해주더군요. Com › daemanhwangjetueo4광고 아님. 동갤행님들 글 존나게 열심히 정독하다가 여긴 아닌가 싶었지만 그래도 티켓값 저렴하고 싸게 먹힌다는 다낭으로 감열심히 구글링 하면서 황제투어를 가볼까 했지만 좀 비싼거같기도 해서 가라오케만 예약하고 출바알. 개인적인 경험으로 대만 먼저 말해줄게 1, 타이베이 타이베이. 대만 호의 듣는데 여행이 갈 수 있나요. 카베시리 애니

케데헌 야짤 디시 Com › daemanhwangjetueo솔직히 말해서 대만 황제투어, 처음인데도 걱정 없이 즐겼어요. 지금부터 빠르고 쉽게 예스폭진지 버스투어 알려드릴게요❗️ ▪️ 저장필수. 이상으로 마무리지으며, 1인 황제투어라고 겁먹지말고 요즘은 인프라가 너무 좋아서 잘 즐긴다면 큰 즐거움을 선사할거에요. Com › daemanhwangjetueo솔직히 말해서 대만 황제투어, 처음인데도 걱정 없이 즐겼어요. 샹차이가 싫은 대만원정대 벙 후기 0일차 로드싸이클. 카리나 보빨

카 메탄 도톤보리 오랜만에 황제투어 관련해서 글을 작성해보려고해요. 남자 연예인 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 대만 황제투어 대만 여행 시먼딩 가볼만한곳 대만 라오허제야시장 대만 ktv 대만 야시장 여사장복장 대만 스웨디시 주야니 대만 대만 야시장 누나 징크스. N년간 대만 황제투어를 즐긴 제가 말하는 숨겨진 꿀팁 대. 사실 예전에 유튜브에 올라온 베트남에 황제이발소 동영상보고.

케인 여울 떡방 동갤행님들 글 존나게 열심히 정독하다가 여긴 아닌가 싶었지만 그래도 티켓값 저렴하고 싸게 먹힌다는 다낭으로 감열심히 구글링 하면서 황제투어를 가볼까 했지만 좀 비싼거같기도 해서 가라오케만 예약하고 출바알. 명멜은 갤에서 제일 올려치기 심한데 남자 연예인 갤러리. 아무것도 몰랐고 아무 기대도 안한 도시였지만. 내 기억으로 대충 슥슥 그린거니까 알아서 생각하도록. Tiktok에서 대만 타이베이 야시장 관련 동영상을 찾아보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.