Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

개쌉장문주의 김지훈 강연 요약 로보토미 코퍼레이션 채널. 김지훈도 야짤 저장중임 로보토미 코퍼레이션 마이너 갤러리. Project moon에 대한 문서, hominem te esse memento당신도 한낱 인간임을 기억하라 대한민국의 인디 게임 개발사. 1992년 출생으로 아주대학교 미디어학과를 졸업했습니다.

Tae_ha_xx Sex

Tichelin

Tachibanaomina Kemono

아래는 로보토미와 라이브러리 오브 루이나에 대한.. 개쌉장문주의 김지훈 강연 요약 로보토미 코퍼레이션 채널..

0126 0722 근데 상대하는 입장에서는 단붕이가 진짜 지랄맞은듯.. 스크랩 갤로그 가기 이미지 프문은 갤 항상 모니터링중임.. 2016년 말 2017로보토미 출시 라오루 개발중이라 밝혔을때 현재모습 인터뷰 내용으론 30대 후 라오루개발 스트레스를 먹는걸로 풀어서 본인도 살찐거 인지한다고함 가장가까운 근황사진인듯 프문 사무소 모습.. Com › ndc2017 › sessionsndc replay..

Tomomi Nakama

Gcon2024 ceo 김지훈 프로젝트문 1992년 출생으로 아주대학교 미디어학과를 졸업했습니다, 프로젝트문 대표자명 김지훈 설립년도 2016년 사원수 47 명 매출액 자본금 기업형태 중소기업 300명미만 대표게임 lobotomy corporation 주요사업 게임 개발 대표번호 01000000000 회사위치 16514 경기도 수원시 영통구 하동 10161 광교 sk view lake, 국적 심지어는 프문 내 디스코드에서도 사용되었다고 한다, 아주대 대학원의 미디어과에 재학 중입니다. Xbox로 출시하고 싶다는 욕심이 개인적으로 있는데요, 다른 이유가 있다기 보다는 무엇보다도 멋있으니까요.

thisvid korean muscle 2016년 말 2017로보토미 출시 라오루 개발중이라 밝혔을때 현재모습 인터뷰 내용으론 30대 후 라오루개발 스트레스를 먹는걸로 풀어서 본인도 살찐거 인지한다고함 가장가까운 근황사진인듯 프문 사무소 모습. 학교에 다니며 동료들을 모아 로보토미 코퍼레이션을 제작했으며, 2016년도에 스팀 얼리엑세스로 로보토미 코퍼레이션을 출시했고 동시에 프로젝트문 법인을 설립하였습니다. Projectmoon 대표 김지훈, 이유미 하 내용에는 ‘library of ruina’’의 결말까지의 스포일러가 포함되어 있습니다. 김지훈그냥 내가 만들고 싶은거 만든건데용 프문김지훈 대표 인터뷰로보토미. 영업시간은 11시부터 19시까지이며 이마저도 1시간. su coomer party

start-166 actress 개쌉장문주의 김지훈 강연 요약 로보토미 코퍼레이션 채널. 15 633 1 프문 디렉터 김지훈의 변천사 4 하드게이호크마 2023. 스크랩 갤로그 가기 이미지 프문은 갤 항상 모니터링중임. Xbox로 출시하고 싶다는 욕심이 개인적으로 있는데요, 다른 이유가 있다기 보다는 무엇보다도 멋있으니까요. 김지훈그냥 내가 만들고 싶은거 만든건데용 프문김지훈 대표 인터뷰로보토미. stellaxfrancesca vk

su 페리 Com › 9413236415김지훈 프문대표 기획팀에서 목매단 페페콘을 보내는데 치지직. 나도 중고등학생 때 세계문학 전집 좀 읽어볼걸 싶네이것저것 찾아보긴 했었는데 원서 번역본이라던가 완전판 읽어본 적은 거의 없어서. 대한민국 국기 심지어는 프문 내 디스코드에서도 사용되었다고 한다. 국적 심지어는 프문 내 디스코드에서도 사용되었다고 한다. 대표 및 작품들의 총괄 디렉터는 김지훈. tktube downloader github

t1 갤러리 Lc2 project moon 창립 4주년 기념 방송에서 limbus company 와 함께 공개되었다. 학교에 다니며 동료들을 모아 로보토미 코퍼레이션을 제작했으며, 2016년도에 스팀 얼리엑세스로 로보토미 코퍼레이션을 출시했고 동시에 프로젝트문 법인을 설립하였습니다. 프문은 이번일을 가볍게 넘겨서는 안돼. 팀원들과 팬분들 덕분에 2018년에 로보토미 코퍼레이션을 정식. 본래 아주대학교 출신의 대학생들이 모여서 만든 일종의 동아리였으며, limbus company 의 개발 당시에는 인원이 30명으로 늘어났고, 현재는 50명 정도 규모의 중소기업이 되었다.

t1 4k 국적 심지어는 프문 내 디스코드에서도 사용되었다고 한다. 무척이나 좋았다 또한 김지훈 개인의 성장이 돋보인다 한 인간으로서의 김지훈이 엿보이는 이 인터뷰에선 그는 어린 아이였고 상상하는 청소년이었으며 미숙한 게임개발자 였다 전반적인 통찰력이 성장하였지만 그럼에도 부족한 청년이 있었다. 로보토미 코퍼레이션과 라이브러리 오브 루이나 개발사인 프로젝트문이 데브시스터즈벤처스로부터 20억 원 규모 투자를 유지했다. 뒤틀림 탐정은 초기에 가벼운 분위기로 세계관을 적어나가자는 마음과 글을 쓰는. 그는 학생 시절에 게임 스튜디오 project moon을 설립하고, 『lobotomy corporation』, 『library of ruina』, 그리고.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.