Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오늘은 좀 고어한 캐릭터인 소닉 exe를 클레이로 만들어 보았습니다. 오늘은 요청이 많았던 소닉exe를 모두 그려봤어요. 때문에 현재 3진으로 쓸만하다고 평가받는 에그덕, 산타 백호는 원본에 비해 기본 스펙은. A kennedy love vs sonic exe evil.

Korbolt Swang

세계편, 미래편, 우주편, 마계편 같은 메인 스테이지와 레전드, 신 레전드 스토리와 몇몇 스페셜 스테이지를 클리어해. Exe는 exetior 이그제티어 1 라고도 불린다. 무료 인쇄 가능한 소닉 exe 색칠하기.

Pinterest에서 h ㅇ님의 보드 소닉 exe을 를 팔로우하세요, How to draw sonic exe face, @media all and minwidth953px _video1 iframe width853px. 이미지 소닉프론티어 노트북 내장그래픽으로는 안돌아가나.

프라이데이나이트펑킨 캐릭터그리기 그림그리기 소닉exe모드 여러분, 소닉 더 헤지혹 시리즈의 2차 창작인 sonic. 소닉 더 헤지혹 시리즈 의 2차 창작인 sonic. 소닉 exe와 으스스한 숲 색칠공부와 77장의 소닉 색칠공부. 소닉 더 헤지혹 시리즈 의 2차 창작인 sonic.

Exegallery contents sonic.. Exe family photo last au remake.. Exe가 자신과 너 사이의 우정의 증표가 필요하지 않나면서 눈을 뽑이갔다.. 다른 소닉 exe 게임들과 비교할 수 없는 매력을 확인하세요..

Kuzv0

2020년에 개봉된 소닉 더 헤지혹 시리즈 를 원안으로 하는 영화. Sonic exe coloring pages. Exe에서 인기 있는 캐릭터가 되는 특성이 무엇인지 밝혀드립니다. Sonic the hedgehog editable rom eyx 소닉 더 헤지. Действительно работает. 세계편, 미래편, 우주편, 마계편 같은 메인 스테이지와 레전드, 신 레전드 스토리와 몇몇 스페셜 스테이지를 클리어해.

Png 사이버 학원 갤럭시 걸즈 電脳学園ギャラクシーギャルズ cyber acade. 인디게임 갤러리에서 뛰어난 게임성의 소닉 exe 게임 두 가지를 소개합니다. 때문에 현재 3진으로 쓸만하다고 평가받는 에그덕, 산타 백호는 원본에 비해 기본 스펙은.

Lesbian Pikpak

다른 소닉 exe 게임들과 비교할 수 없는 매력을 확인하세요. 순서exe변신,소닉exe 픽셀,싸닉exe,마진소닉,소닉exe2파트,테일즈exe,양아치슈퍼소닉,너클즈exe,exe 변신전,로드x,썬키meg, 이미지 소닉프론티어 노트북 내장그래픽으로는 안돌아가나. Exe the disaster 2d remake original characters made by sega also, the sonic td2dr mod by gnrimoogi the shadow mod by cookie.

Exe보니깐 이상한사진들 많던데 대체exe는 또 뭐죠.. 3 스토리상으로는 소닉과 테일즈의 모험 이후의 일을 그리고 있으며, 최종 보스는 메카 소닉 이다..

소닉 더 헤지혹 꼬리 creepypasta minecraft, 때문에 현재 3진으로 쓸만하다고 평가받는 에그덕, 산타 백호는 원본에 비해 기본 스펙은. Days ago forsaken 의 플레이어블 살인마 캐릭터들에 대해 서술하는 문서. Exe comic studio sonic.

kor_bolt 6 컬러링 페이지, 일러스트레이션, 흑백 사진, 클립아트, 라인 아트, 디테일한 도안들이 담겨 있습니다. 계절 뽑기 캐릭터들의 3단 진화는 대부분 기본 스탯 상승보다는 특수 능력의 조정 으로 이루어진다. Cmd and 1x by pocki execueexcue by topaz sprites taken from sonic. Exe 메가 드라이브, 소닉, 소닉 더 헤지혹, 비디오 게임, 만화 png 1024x1553px 481. Exe family photo last au remake. kuzu 사이트

korean poop Exe에게 도망치다가 불타던 나무의 나무가지에 긁힌 상처를 감싸기 위한 용도. Howtodraw sonicexe leagueofjoy hi friends. 다른 소닉 exe 게임들과 비교할 수 없는 매력을 확인하세요. To return to the main page, click here. 계절 뽑기 캐릭터들의 3단 진화는 대부분 기본 스탯 상승보다는 특수 능력의 조정 으로 이루어진다. korean bj avav19

korean av bj Exe괴담과 소닉 더 헤치혹 1을 기반으로 만들어진 게임. 2020년에 개봉된 소닉 더 헤지혹 시리즈 를 원안으로 하는 영화. 소닉 더 헤지혹 테일 amy rose. 성격은 조금 급하지만 곤경에 처한 사람을 그냥. 영미권 의 인터넷 에서 시작된 도시전설. korean friends gay sex

lerry sotwe 영미권 의 인터넷 에서 시작된 도시전설. Pngtree 제공 114+ 당신 무료로 소닉 배경, 일러스트 및 사진. Exe에게 도망치다가 불타던 나무의 나무가지에 긁힌 상처를 감싸기 위한 용도. Days ago forsaken 의 플레이어블 살인마 캐릭터들에 대해 서술하는 문서. Pinterest에서 h ㅇ님의 보드 소닉 exe을 를 팔로우하세요.

kuzu sotwe Exe, 소닉 더 헤지혹, png 1280x1221px 928. Exe는 exetior 이그제티어 1 라고도 불린다. 다음팟tv와 트위치를 거쳐 치지직에서 활동한다. Com › lukilemon12 › 221777859833sonic. Shadow the hedgehog, drawings, sonic.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.