최근 유튜브 스케치 코미디 채널 싱글벙글에서 비밀을 간직한 알바생 ‘aj1038’ 역을 맡아 다채로운 매력을 선보이고 있는 장은비는 짧은 영상 속에서도 섬세한 연기와 매력적인 모습으로 시청자들의 시선을 사로잡았.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

해야만 하는 쉐어하우스의 주인공은 박시연이 연기한 캐릭터로, 작품의 중심에서 다양한 갈등과 로맨스를 겪습니다. Com › mgallery › board갠취로 올해 젤 만족스한건 웹드랑 앱드라마인듯 김규선 마이너 갤. 1,399 likes, 7 comments b_play_official on octo 후방 주의⚠️ 비플레이 웹드라마 해야만하는쉐어하우스 thebedmategame 드라마 dramas kdrama gl romance 게임 연애 플러팅 남사친 여사친 박시연 지호근 차현승 장은비 전준호 유이솔. 장은비 영상,사진 모음 장은비 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

배우 차현승은 극 중 상대역으로 등장하여 흥미로운 관계를 형성합니다.. 박시연은 작품 속에서 색다른 매력을 보여주었습니다.. Com 아무튼 일반 드라마와 달리 특이했던 건.. Com › qwertypoiuyasd › statusx..

숏폼드라마 해야만 하는 쉐어하우스 후기 줄거리, 결말, 출연진, 차현승, 박시연, 스토리릴스, Storyreels 솔로지옥 때부터 팬이었던 현승님 ️ 솔로지옥 2 나왔던 덱스 님도 최근에 ‘타로’에서 배우 데뷔를 성 M.

계속 바나나 꼭지 부터 바나나 껍질을 원숭이가 힘도 안들이고 김프로 장은비 디시 유백합 장은비 수영장 유백합 정은비 유백합.

오감자극 섹슈얼 로맨스 해야만 하는 쉐어하우스 🏠 지금 비글루 vigloo 앱에서 시청 가능, 갠취로 올해 젤 만족스한건 웹드랑 앱드라마인듯 김규선, 쉐어하우스에서의 특별한 경험이 기다립니다.

장은비의 짧은 드라마에서 감동적인 순간을 경험하세요. 해야만 하는 쉐어하우스의 주인공은 박시연이 연기한 캐릭터로, 작품의 중심에서 다양한 갈등과 로맨스를 겪습니다. 계속 바나나 꼭지 부터 바나나 껍질을 원숭이가 힘도 안들이고 김프로 장은비 디시 유백합 장은비 수영장 유백합 정은비 유백합. 쉐어하우스 웹드라마 결과, 쉐어하우스 장은비.

🌈 숏폼드라마 해야만 하는 쉐어하우스 후기 줄거리, 결말, 출연진, 차현승, 박시연, 스토리릴스, Storyreels 솔로지옥 때부터 팬이었던 현승님 ️ 솔로지옥 2 나왔던 덱스 님도 최근에 ‘타로’에서 배우 데뷔를 성 M.

서하초 아이토피아 임대주택은 주민을 중심으로 지자체와 공공기관이 협력해 폐교 위기의 학교와 마을 공동체를 살리기 위한 주거지원 사업으로, 지난 4월 lh와 경상남도 read more, 쉐어하우스 웹드라마 결과, 쉐어하우스 장은비, 박시연은 작품 속에서 색다른 매력을 보여주었습니다, Com › mgallery › board갠취로 올해 젤 만족스한건 웹드랑 앱드라마인듯 김규선 마이너 갤. 안녕하세요 유튜버이자 숏 드라마에서 활동 중인 인플루언서 장은비라고 합니다.

장은비 시청, 김프로 장은비 디시, 장은비 재미있는 콘텐츠.

쉐어하우스 웹드라마 결과, 쉐어하우스 장은비. Com › board › view짧지만 강렬하게, 인플루언서 장은비 디시인터뷰 갤러리. 웃음 그 분은 장은비 맞다고 내기에 거셨다고 해서 ‘하이파이브. 특별한 크리에이터의 이야기를 만나보세요. 장은비 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 장은비 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

일반적인 ott 서비스에서는 찾아보기 어렵기 때문에, 시청을 원한다면 해당 앱을 설치하고 이용해야. 감정의 대립과 화해가 반복되며 서사는 진행됩니다, 장은비 영상,사진 모음 장은비 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, Jeehogeun과 chahyunseong의 열정적이고 흥미진진한 사랑 이야기. Com › board › view짧지만 강렬하게, 인플루언서 장은비 디시인터뷰 갤러리.

장은비의 짧은 드라마에서 감동적인 순간을 경험하세요.

서하초 아이토피아 임대주택은 주민을 중심으로 지자체와 공공기관이 협력해 폐교 위기의 학교와 마을 공동체를 살리기 위한 주거지원 사업으로, 지난 4월 lh와 경상남도 read more. Com › @b_play_official › video해야만 하는 쉐어하우스 오감자극 섹슈얼 로맨스 tiktok. Com › 866해야만 하는 쉐어 하우스 보는곳 장은비 출연진 등장인물 ott 결말 줄.

동그란 꼭지노출 Com › 866해야만 하는 쉐어 하우스 보는곳 장은비 출연진 등장인물 ott 결말 줄. Com › qwertypoiuyasd › statusx. 장은비의 놀라운 순간들 짧고 감동적인 이야기. Kang eun bi umumkan pernikahan, fakta menariknya. 저렴한 쉐어하우스에서 살았던게 계기였어요. 디시 정액

도리 jh 101 다양한 성격들이 부딪히며 예상치 못한 사건들이 이어집니다. Com › @b_play_official › video오감자극 섹슈얼 로맨스 해야만 하는 쉐어하우스 tiktok. 숏폼드라마 해야만 하는 쉐어하우스 후기 줄거리, 결말, 출연진, 차현승, 박시연, 스토리릴스, storyreels 솔로지옥 때부터 팬이었던 현승님 ️ 솔로지옥 2 나왔던 덱스 님도 최근에 ‘타로’에서 배우 데뷔를 성 m. ’ 하면서 ‘역시 눈썰미 장난 아니시네요’ 하신 분도 있었습니다. 일반적인 ott 서비스에서는 찾아보기 어렵기 때문에, 시청을 원한다면 해당 앱을 설치하고 이용해야. 도읍지 도끼자국

동그란 야짤 박시연은 작품 속에서 색다른 매력을 보여주었습니다. Com › board › view짧지만 강렬하게, 인플루언서 장은비 디시인터뷰 갤러리. 장은비의 짧은 드라마에서 감동적인 순간을 경험하세요. オリジナル 비글루 쉐어하우스 은비 은비 어린시절. 쉐어하우스 웹드라마 결과, 쉐어하우스 장은비. 두타스테리드 가격 디시

돈키호테 야짤 Com › vckse2ks › 223682114194해야만 하는 쉐어하우스 등장인물 결말 다시보기 ott 장은비 프로필. 짧지만 강렬하게, 인플루언서 장은비 디시人터뷰 갤러리. ’ 하면서 ‘역시 눈썰미 장난 아니시네요’ 하신 분도 있었습니다. 해야만 하는 쉐어하우스는 스토리릴스 오리지널 작품으로, 스토리릴스에서 시청할 경우 인터렉티브로 간혹 선택지 회차가 뜬다. 계속 바나나 꼭지 부터 바나나 껍질을 원숭이가 힘도 안들이고 김프로 장은비 디시 유백합 장은비 수영장 유백합 정은비 유백합.

도우시노 19 갠취로 올해 젤 만족스한건 웹드랑 앱드라마인듯 김규선. 장은비의 놀라운 순간들 짧고 감동적인 이야기. Com › 866해야만 하는 쉐어 하우스 보는곳 장은비 출연진 등장인물 ott 결말 줄. Ex 왕게임에서 딥키스를 할 번호를 시청자에게 직접 고르라고 하는 식. 좋아요 339개, 댓글 9개가 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.