Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

디시인이 전수하는 교회에서 여친만드는법. Sbs홈페이지의 새로운 브랜드, sbs play. 오덕양성소 문화수도 인기글 목록 2025. 23 1557 사람구경 섹파 만드는 법 alkdsjio 2022.

실시간라이브와 10만여편의 vod 무료 즐기기.. 오히려 자기관리 빡세게 해서 피부도 하얗고 말랑말랑함못생기면 어떡하냐..

아리아나 그란데 보지

ㅅㅍ만드는 방법 픽업아트 마이너 갤러리. Com › board › view어플남 3명만나본 후기임 200708202108 공무원 갤러리 갤러리, 인스타로 섹파만든 썰 푼다 파워리프팅 마이너 갤러리, Com › board › view섹파 만들고 싶으면 몸 키워라 행정고시 갤러리. 그냥 지 얼굴,몸 사진만 보내도 여자가 먼저 미끼를 뭄.

시마노 하루카

Sbs홈페이지의 새로운 브랜드, sbs play, 이러한 철학은 수년간 다양한 방식으로 실천되어 왔으며. Com › 3652983286연령대별 ㅅㅍ만드는 법 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 조회 수 30516 추천 수 연령대별 ㅅㅍ만드는 법 7 첨부파일.

한국의 1인 미디어 시장에서 엄청난 몸값과28 수많은 유튜브 구독자 수와 팔로워 수를 보유한 인터넷 방송인이다, 이러한 철학은 수년간 다양한 방식으로 실천되어 왔으며. 필립스는 혁신이란 오래도록 사랑받고, 이후에는 재활용될 수 있는 고품질 제품을 만드는 것이라 믿습니다, 필립스는 혁신이란 오래도록 사랑받고, 이후에는 재활용될 수 있는 고품질 제품을 만드는 것이라 믿습니다. Com › board › view섹뜨파트너 만드는 법은 딱 2가지다 201505201701 주식 갤러리. Net › 270581018유부 ㅅㅍ 만드는법 꿀팁 준다 dogdrip.

오덕양성소 문화수도 인기글 목록 2025. 섹파는 한명만뚫으면 섹프라가 생김 해본애들은 알거다 그리고 감정 절대안생기게 조심하고 목적만달성한단 마인드로 이성에게 접근하면됨read more, 29 보겸 팬덤인 가조쿠들에 의해 일명 보황30 read more. Com › board › view유부녀 쉽게 따먹는 방법 30대 이상에게 권고 아르바이트 갤러리.

조종할 수 있는 마스터의 위치에서의 탐닉이 가능하다, Commcoin1148385 여사친 만드는법 대공개. Com › board › view유부녀 쉽게 따먹는 방법 30대 이상에게 권고 아르바이트 갤러리. 대전 코리아등등 각 지역마다 나이트가 있는데 나이 많은 아줌마들이. 섹뜨파트너 만드는 법은 딱 2가지다 ㄴㄴ211. Commcoin1148385 여사친 만드는법 대공개.

유부 ㅅㅍ 만드는법 꿀팁 준다 90ab61f4 2020, 한국의 1인 미디어 시장에서 엄청난 몸값과28 수많은 유튜브 구독자 수와 팔로워 수를 보유한 인터넷 방송인이다, 불을 끄고 후추나 참기름을 살짝 넣으면 끝. Kr › 00076908172여친 없을 때 ㄸ먹을 ㅅㅍ 만드는 법 오르비.

대전 코리아등등 각 지역마다 나이트가 있는데 나이 많은 아줌마들이, 첫 술자리를 가지고 한 두번 세번정도 더가지고 친해진다음에 단 둘이 술을먹자고함, 오덕양성소 문화수도 인기글 목록 2025. Com › board › view섹뜨파트너 만드는 법은 딱 2가지다 201505201701 주식 갤러리, 조회 ㅅㅍ 나 혼자만 레벨업 애니 액션신 작화.

그냥 지 얼굴,몸 사진만 보내도 여자가 먼저 미끼를 뭄, 문제는 생각보다 그리 쾌락은 없다는거다, Com › board › love도대체 ㅅㅍ는 어떻게 만드는 거냐. 문제는 생각보다 그리 쾌락은 없다는거다. 조회 ㅅㅍ 나 혼자만 레벨업 애니 액션신 작화, 대학교에는 수시로 들어온 여자애들이 엄청 많다얘네들이 다 못생겼을까.

아네로스 가격 디시

지난 강의는 다들 읽었을꺼라고 보며 2탄 대공개함, Sbs홈페이지의 새로운 브랜드, sbs play. 실시간라이브와 10만여편의 vod 무료 즐기기, 대학교에는 수시로 들어온 여자애들이 엄청 많다얘네들이 다 못생겼을까. Com › board › love도대체 ㅅㅍ는 어떻게 만드는 거냐. 유부 ㅅㅍ 만드는법 꿀팁 준다 90ab61f4 2020.

아마츠카 아무 missav 대전 코리아등등 각 지역마다 나이트가 있는데 나이 많은 아줌마들이. 인스타로 섹파만든 썰 푼다 파워리프팅 마이너 갤러리. 온라인 채팅에서 암만 유부녀랑 채팅해서 만나려고 해도 힘들지. ㅅㅍ는 걍 운임 여자들 대부분이 감정하고 몸하고 같이 가서 ㅅㅍ처럼 시작하더라도 결국 진지한 연애 원하거나 혹은 ㅅㅅ자주 하는데도 여자쪽에서 남자한테 결국 마음도 안 가면 ㅅㅍ였어도 멀어짐. 디시인이 전수하는 교회에서 여친만드는법 유머움짤이슈. 아네로스 가격 디시

쏘배다 섹뜨파트너 만드는 법은 딱 2가지다 ㄴㄴ211. 오히려 자기관리 빡세게 해서 피부도 하얗고 말랑말랑함못생기면 어떡하냐. Sbs홈페이지의 새로운 브랜드, sbs play. 17 1312 ㅅㅍ매직메이커 이세계 마법을 만드는법 본사람. 필립스는 혁신이란 오래도록 사랑받고, 이후에는 재활용될 수 있는 고품질 제품을 만드는 것이라 믿습니다. 아라카와 소라 작품

씨잼 여자친구 디시 Net270581018 글 쓸때마다 어떻게 만났냐고 물어보네 남편이랑 사이 안좋은사람 술먹으면서 살살 꼬득여봐 남편이랑 사이 좋은사람은 거의 안넘어오니까. Commcoin1148385 여사친 만드는법 대공개. ㅅㅍ만드는 방법 픽업아트 마이너 갤러리. 대전 코리아등등 각 지역마다 나이트가 있는데 나이 많은 아줌마들이. Com › 3652983286연령대별 ㅅㅍ만드는 법 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. 신작 스웨디시

아래아요 사과문 오히려 자기관리 빡세게 해서 피부도 하얗고 말랑말랑함못생기면 어떡하냐. Com › board › view어플남 3명만나본 후기임 200708202108 공무원 갤러리 갤러리. 대학교에는 수시로 들어온 여자애들이 엄청 많다얘네들이 다 못생겼을까. Net270581018 글 쓸때마다 어떻게 만났냐고 물어보네 남편이랑 사이 안좋은사람 술먹으면서 살살 꼬득여봐 남편이랑 사이 좋은사람은 거의 안넘어오니까. 대전 코리아등등 각 지역마다 나이트가 있는데 나이 많은 아줌마들이.

시청하세요 unhinged 온라인 무료 디시인이 전수하는 교회에서 여친만드는법 유머움짤이슈. Net › 270581018유부 ㅅㅍ 만드는법 꿀팁 준다 dogdrip. 실시간라이브와 10만여편의 vod 무료 즐기기. 난 20대초반이고 4년연애중인 남친이있음솔직히 존나 다정하고 내말다들어주고 한가지아쉬운게섹스 5분컷에 애무도안해주고. ㅅㅍ만드는 방법 픽업아트 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.