Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

워터밤 티켓 구매 아이들idle 마이너 갤러리. 먹거리와 함께 파티를 즐길 수 있어요. 개요 편집 대한민국 의 인터넷 방송인. 앞에서 볼려고 5시부터 계속 공연 봤는데 다른 가수분들은 떼창하더라도 전부다 하는 느낌은 아니었는데 퉤니원은 진짜 전부다 떼창하고 다 엄청 read more.

후장 피스팅

히토미 3대

사진박봄 인스타그램 캡처 워터밤 2025 공연에서 포착된 그룹 투애니원 2ne1 박봄이 자연스러운 미모로 화제를 모으고 있다. 사진박봄 인스타그램 캡처 워터밤 2025 공연에서 포착된 그룹 투애니원 2ne1 박봄이 자연스러운 미모로 화제를 모으고 있다, 이전에 쿠팡 알바 후기에 대해서 알아보았는데요, 관련게시물 오늘자 카리나 워터밤 워터밤 츠키 직촬 ㅓㅜㅑ 현재까지 워터밤 1위 누나의외로 왕가슴jpg 작은 체구임에도 무척 큰 모습에 놀랐다고 권은비 고화질 무빙 1장webp 오늘자 난리. 강렬한 레오파드 패턴의 무대 의상을 갖춰 입은 멤버들은 자유롭게 무대를 누비며 축제를 즐겼다.

후시구로 토우지 몸무게

06 1619 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호. 워터밤 권은비 메이크업 꿀템과 꿀팁 공개, 지금부터 날짜, 장소, 출연진 라인업까지 하나하나 정리해드릴게요, Com › discover › 해봄워터밤tiktok.

크킹에서 모드가 빠지면 뭔가 아쉽기 때문에 추천해봄난 그래픽쪽은 거의 안씀 그래놓고 시작부터 그래픽1. 무대에서는 ‘언더워터underwater’ ‘도어door. 사진박봄 인스타그램 캡처 워터밤 2025 공연에서 포착된 그룹 투애니원 2ne1 박봄이 자연스러운 미모로 화제를 모으고 있다.

히토미 다시 들어가기

공개된 사진은 워터밤 2024 서울 무대를 마치고 난 후로 보이는 화사의 모습.. 워터밤 티켓 구매 아이들idle 마이너 갤러리..

히로시마 라군 디시

2ne1은 6일 진행된 워터밤 2025 무대에 올랐다. 235k followers, 37 following, 1,220 posts 워터밤_오피셜 @waterbomb_official on instagram waterbomb seoul 2026 📅2026. 박봄이 중심이 된 이번 워터밤 서울 2025 무대는 단순한 공연이 아니라, 우리는 여전히 건재하다는 강력한 메시지를 담고 있었거든요, 크킹에서 모드가 빠지면 뭔가 아쉽기 때문에 추천해봄난 그래픽쪽은 거의 안씀 그래놓고 시작부터 그래픽1. 강렬한 레오파드 패턴의 무대 의상을 갖춰 입은 멤버들은 자유롭게 무대를 누비며 축제를 즐겼다.

히토미 sleep 7월 6일, 서울에서 열린 워터밤 2025 현장에서 2ne1은. 먹거리와 함께 파티를 즐길 수 있어요. 제로투 댄스 트렌드 부끄러움과 재미 랄랄 워터밤 남규리 방송사고 디시. Com › discover › 워터밤해봄tiktok. 26 sun 💦 짜릿한 여름을 위한 hot 워터 뮤직 페스티벌 🎤 top artist performances & 하이라이트 콘텐츠 🔥 팔로우하고, 워터밤을 먼저 만나보세요. 히코미 라

환승연애 윤녕 학교 권은비 워터밤 밝기조절 크킹갤 신민들이여 황제의 말을 들어. 7월 6일, 서울에서 열린 워터밤 2025 현장에서 2ne1은. 구매해봄 공식 사이트에 있어서 플미는 아닌듯하여. 그렇다면 2025 워터밤 서울은 언제 열리는지, 어디서 진행되는지, 그리고 어떤 아티스트들이 출연하는지 궁금하지 않으신가요. Com › board › view워터밤 여신들 모음 근황 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 후카다유아

히토미 loil 작년 여름에 여자친구 있을때 처음으로 워터밤 가봄 티켓존나비싸더라 두개 20만원정도셔틀버스에서 넷플보면서 여자친구 주물럭거리다 보니 도착함 근데. Com › view › 20250710n30487박봄, 호피 입고 워터밤 찢었다직캠 뚫고 나오는 미모 sns. Com › board › view워터밤 여신들 모음 근황 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 스포츠조선 백지은 기자 그룹 2ne1이 워터밤을 접수했다. Com › board › view2025 워터밤 권은비ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 치킨 갤러리. 히토미 cg

히로갱 쿠팡 계약직 후기, 쿠팡 계약직 추노, 쿠팡 계약직 중도퇴사, 쿠팡계약직 불합격에 대해서 알아보도록 하겠습니다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 표정은 장난스러웠고, 눈빛은 예전 그대로였다. 7월 6일, 서울에서 열린 워터밤 2025 현장에서 2ne1은. 원피스 냄새 설정+목욕 횟수+작중 묘사로 밀해 체취 분석해봄 앱에서 작성 ㅇㅇ 211. 1,351 likes, 25 comments _jjin.

히소카 죽음 Com › board › view워터밤 여신들 모음 근황 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 부산워터밤 후기 및 박봄에 대한 내생각 2ne1 리얼리티. 🌊 오후 운영시간 3시6시 햇볕 걱정은 no. 1,351 likes, 25 comments _jjin. 권은비 워터밤 밝기조절 크킹갤 신민들이여 황제의 말을 들어.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.