Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2012년 6월 닛테레 제닉 후보생 45명. 에어 エール, 2020 여급 에미코 역. Meovv have dropped their debut profile photo for anna. ♧노나 10월 공연안내♧ 1 10월18일 저녁7시 청춘on 양주버스킹 가을선율버스킹 2 10월19일 저녁8시 작은콘서트 힘내라 대한민국 3 10월26일 오후2시30분 원도봉산 등산힐링페스타 바람이 좋은 가을날에 라이브로 듣는 힐링뮤직♡ 가까운곳에 계신분들 놀러오세요 청춘버스킹 힐링페스타 미니.

@seah4beta

60 대 여성 헤어 스타일

429의 늪에 빠졌기에 미리 소개글을 써본다.. 덕분에 안나가 off모드로도 아이돌 활동을 하는 데에 성공한 첫 이벤트가 되었다..

99일 배경화면

Com › 13키시 안나 anna kisi 岸杏南 83년생 av배우. kici_annaa on aug 데일리로 하는 헤어스타일링을 낋여왔어요 요즘 느좋녀 되기 프로젝트 중 머리가 밝아서 그런지 텍스쳐가 잘 영상에 잘 안 담겨서 사알짝 아쉽지만 그래도 나름 열심히 해봤습니다 어울리는 헤어스타일을 못 찾아서 이렇게 하고 다니는데 어울릴만한 스타일 댓글로 추천해. 에타나 엔메바라게시 엔메르카르 루갈반다 6 가뭄의 신인 구갈안나, 즉 하늘의 황소를 길가메시와 엔키두가 죽인 후에, Com › kici_annaa키시 안나 @kici_annaa instagram photos and videos. 콘노 안나今野杏南, こんのあんな, konno anna.

직업보단 애초에 11등 라인이 환산차이가 크게 안나긴함 키시으 lv, 6권에서 소피아가 벌인 테러와 기존에 교육 받은 가치관 때문에 무엇이 진실인지 모르겠다는 반응을 보인다. Name키시 안나,anna kisi,岸杏南birthdate19831125height154weightmeasurementsb94w59h87.

65g녀 토렌트

Com › kici_annaa키시 안나 @kici_annaa instagram photos and videos. 수다 흉성 솔플, 환산이랑 실제 랭킹 비교. 번역 왼손잡이 에렌 73, 74화 뉴욕편 완 만화 갤러리, 개요편집 마인즈 소속이었던 일본의 前 av 여배우. 는 내가 안나간다 안나간다 하믄 업어서 데리고 나가는. 22 likes, 3 comments kici_annaa on j 안녕하세요 키시 펄 원장님 메인 인턴 안나입니다 🪽🤍 25.

@retsu_dao8 세계 믹스더블 컬링 선수권 대회영어 world mixed doubles curling championships 는 세계 최고의 믹스더블 컬링 팀들이 참가하는 연례 컬링 대회이다. 하지만 점점 신뢰도가 쌓이고, 결정적으로 김독자가 범람의 재앙에게서 자신을 구하기 위해 희생한 일이 계기가 되어 김독자를 동료로 인정하게 된다. As previously reported, she. 덕분에 안나가 off모드로도 아이돌 활동을 하는 데에 성공한 첫 이벤트가 되었다. Ai 공부하고 싶다면 책부터 읽읍시다. @fd_seory

8번 출구 야동 덕분에 안나가 off모드로도 아이돌 활동을 하는 데에 성공한 첫 이벤트가 되었다. 본명은 田中杏奈 타나카 안나로, 현재 18세입니다. 번역 내시의 혼잣말 2화 만화 갤러리. Com › 1424키시 안나,anna kisi,岸杏南. Kr 키시 안나 품번보기 rbb082 20160219 tmem069 20150626 agr16 20150108 mist038 20141108. ai 야동

@xxpxrrx Ai 공부하고 싶다면 책부터 읽읍시다. 또한 눈매가 위로 올라가 있고 눈끝이 뾰쪽하며 쌍꺼풀을 지니고 있고 뺨과 어깨에 주근깨 가 있다. Days ago meovv에 대한 정보와 관련된 내용이 나무위키에 수록되어 있습니다. 에어 エール, 2020 여급 에미코 역. 수다 흉성 솔플, 환산이랑 실제 랭킹 비교. 99일밤 핵

65g 야동 Com › 13키시 안나 anna kisi 岸杏南 83년생 av배우. 키시 안나 anna kisi 岸杏南 생년월일 19831125 신장 154 cm 신체사이즈 b94w59h87 컵사이즈 i splaystore. Name키시 안나,anna kisi,岸杏南birthdate19831125height154weightmeasurementsb94w59h87. Days ago 대한민국 에서 활동하는 일본인 가수. Com › reel › dlsko2nywsu키시 안나 안녕하세요 키시 펄 원장님 메인 인턴 안나입니다 25.

65g 근황 디시 개요편집 마인즈 소속이었던 일본의 前 av 여배우. 일부 사이트에서는 미츠하시 안나 anna mitsuhashi라고. ㅇ 아노아 루루 아리무라 노조미 아리사카 미유키 아마네 미즈키 아마노 코코로 아마미 츠바사 아마츠카 모에 아사노 고코로 아사미 유마 아사히 세리나 아사히나 아카리 아스카 키라라 아야미 슌카 아야세 덴 아오이 미노리 아오이 소라 아오이 이부키 아오이 이치고 아오이 츠카사 아오조라. 미하시 안나 三橋杏奈anna mihashi 생년월일 1984년 11월30일 출신지 도쿄도 혈액형 a형 신장 153cm 쓰리사이즈 b92 g컵 w59 h88 2014년 10월 데뷔한 숙녀계 여배우. 240 likes, 19 comments kici_annaa on j 원장님 @pearl.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.