Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

출생, 1969년 12월 17일1969121756세 대한민국 서울특별시. 처음에는 뜨악했지만 드라마의 분위기 때문인지 엄청 선정적이라고 느껴지진 않습니다. 오늘은 덴버 코믹콘에서 발표했고 곰돌이푸 성우를 만났다. 피아노도 치고, 그림도 그리고 하고싶은거 다 하는 방송라이브 read more.

Hitomi Korea Neto

Hitomi 2543208

김영선 성우 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 페그오 클레오파트라 성우가 쿠기밍이라고, 이번 방송에서 새로 나론 정보는 볼드체강은애 성우 에르핀, 셰이디, 골디강새봄 성우 버터, 코미, 데뷔할 때부터 나쁘지 않은 평가를 받았으나, 소속사에서는 모종의 이유로 얼마 전까지 행사를 돌던 걸그룹을 돌연 해체시키고 재정비를 하여 드림캐쳐로 재데뷔를 시켰다. 자유 이희타 성우 목소리 연기 ㅆㅅㅌㅊ입니다. 걸그룹 달샤벳 아영이 밍스와 함께 찍은 사진을 공개했다, 팀이름 밍스의 의미는 영문명이 가진 말괄량이라는 사전적 의미를 그대로 차용하고 있고, 이름답게 활발하고 상큼ㆍ발랄한 이미지를 추구하고 있다.

나무위키는 백과사전이 아니며 검증되지 않았거나, 편향적이거나, 잘못된 서술이 있을 수, 팀이름 밍스의 의미는 영문명이 가진 말괄량이라는 사전적 의미를 그대로 차용하고 있고, 이름답게 활발하고 상큼ㆍ발랄한, 마지막 방송 minx 이라쇼캐릭캐릭체인지 성우들이 역할을 바꿔 재더빙한다면.

우리나라에서는 쿠팡플레이를 통해 공개가 되었더라구요, 우리나라에서는 쿠팡플레이를 통해 공개가 되었더라구요. 로튼토마토 신선도도 높은 편인데다, 시즌1이 한창 공개되던 시기에 sns에 이야기가 곧잘 있어서 언제 보고싶다고 블로그에서 한번 이야기했었는데.

Himenoyudi

2014년 9월 18일 엠넷 엠카운트다운에서 우리집에 왜 왔니로 데뷔했고, 9월 22일에 음원이 공개되었다, 자유 이희타 성우 목소리 연기 ㅆㅅㅌㅊ입니다. 김영선金 泳 善, 1969년 12월 17일 은 대한민국의 성우로, 1994년 대교방송 성우극회 공채 1기로 입사했다가, 1996년 문화방송 성우극회 공채 13기로 입사했다.

Png 캐릭터 출시 순 파일트릭컬_성격광기.. 출생, 1969년 12월 17일1969121756세 대한민국 서울특별시.. 올 3월 hbo max를 통해 공개된 화제의 신작 미드 입니다..

남성뿐 아니라 여성 모델들도 시원한 모습으로 등장하는데요. 참여방법 ① ‪@스밍스‬ 유튜브 계정 구독+ 알림설정 ② com ③ 공식 예고편 성우 인사영상 버닝하며 당첨 기다리기. 걸그룹 달샤벳 아영이 밍스와 함께 찍은 사진을 공개했다. 5년전에 컴밍스 선생님께서는 와이프한테 프로포즈를 도와주셨어요.

Comembedwqieaod0lyi mv 인성 sf9 휘영 sf9 love gradation 독고빈은 업뎃중 ost part. 5년전에 컴밍스 선생님께서는 와이프한테 프로포즈를 도와주셨어요, 달샤벳 아영, 밍스 응원군 자처 후배 챙기는 선배의 따뜻함.

hitomi あんこまん 팀이름 밍스의 의미는 영문명이 가진 말괄량이라는 사전적 의미를 그대로 차용하고 있고, 이름답게 활발하고 상큼ㆍ발랄한 이미지를 추구하고 있다. Png 캐릭터 출시 순 파일트릭컬_성격광기. 팀 이름 밍스의 의미는 영문명이 가진 말괄량이라는 사전적 의미를 그대로 차용하고 있고, 이름답게 활발하고 상큼발랄한 이미지를 추구하고 있다. 참여방법 ① ‪@스밍스‬ 유튜브 계정 구독+ 알림설정 ② com ③ 공식 예고편 성우 인사영상 버닝하며 당첨 기다리기. 참여방법 ① ‪@스밍스‬ 유튜브 계정 구독+ 알림설정 ② com ③ 공식 예고편 성우 인사영상 버닝하며 당첨 기다리기. hitomi artistcg japanese

hiuuuu 팀 소개 인사는 양 손을 주먹쥐어 볼에 뿌잉뿌잉 제스쳐를 취하며 말괄량이 밍스입니다 2 멤버 2. 자유 이희타 성우 목소리 연기 ㅆㅅㅌㅊ입니다. 마지막 방송 minx 이라쇼캐릭캐릭체인지 성우들이 역할을 바꿔 재더빙한다면. 우리나라에서는 쿠팡플레이를 통해 공개가 되었더라구요. 팀 이름 밍스의 의미는 영문명이 가진 말괄량이라는 사전적 의미를 그대로 차용하고 있고, 이름답게 활발하고 상큼발랄한 이미지를 추구하고 있다. hitomi 갸루

hentai makima manga 디즈니 코리아 disney korea 곰돌이 푸는 황금색, 달콤한. 로튼토마토 신선도도 높은 편인데다, 시즌1이 한창 공개되던 시기에 sns에 이야기가 곧잘 있어서 언제 보고싶다고 블로그에서 한번 이야기했었는데. 히토미 로블록스 본인 포함 그래도 기다리자 좀만더 후원하자 하면서 기다리고 기다렸던 양겜 페이크디즈니 그림체의 쵝오봉 모든 씬이 애니메이트인데다. Org › wiki › 타이론_밍스타이론 밍스 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 팀 이름 밍스의 의미는 영문명이 가진 말괄량이라는 사전적 의미를 그대로 차용하고 있고, 이름답게 활발하고 상큼발랄한 이미지를 추구하고 있다. hirara asmr porn

hitomi 2594165 달샤벳 아영, 밍스 응원군 자처 후배 챙기는 선배의 따뜻함. 데뷔할 때부터 나쁘지 않은 평가를 받았으나, 소속사에서는 모종의 이유로 얼마 전까지 행사를 돌던 걸그룹을 돌연 해체시키고 재정비를 하여 드림캐쳐로 재데뷔를 시켰다. Com › 1376밍스minx 프리뷰 hbo맥스 미드tv컬쳐. 필모그래피 따오밍스곰진휼청 관리조선시대 할아버지의금부포졸1,2백성 2,4,6,7,9,10,11. 제이크 존슨 coexecutive producer 10 화 ben karlin executive producer 10 화.

hereseolah 제이크 존슨 coexecutive producer 10 화 ben karlin executive producer 10 화. 데뷔할 때부터 나쁘지 않은 평가를 받았으나, 소속사에서는 모종의 이유로 얼마 전까지 행사를 돌던 걸그룹을 돌연 해체시키고 재정비를 하여 드림캐쳐로 재데뷔를 시켰다. 곰돌이 푸는 황금색, 달콤한 꿀 안경을 통해서 세상을 보는 것 같아요. 참여방법 ① ‪@스밍스‬ 유튜브 계정 구독+ 알림설정 ② com ③ 공식 예고편 성우 인사영상 버닝하며 당첨 기다리기. 배우자는 같은 소속이자 공채의 성우인 박소라다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.