Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

부자 1tv 수요일 밤 9시 55분 서장훈의 이웃집 백만장자 특집 다큐 아무튼 ai 땅 다큐프라임 천하제일 중국명산 pd로그, 86화 달콤, 살벌한 전통 쌀엿. 세계 부자 순위 the worlds billionaries는 재산 을 기준으로 전세계 부자 들을 구별한 순위를 의미한다. 26 000501 조회 29678 추천 221 댓글 466 3. 국내방송 카테고리로 분류된 나는 솔로 갤러리입니다.

Tidouga

Teidoga

16 135001 조회 96529 추천 720 댓글 867 존존스 맥그리거 퍼티타의 차이. 시골 소도시가 땅값이 비싸서 땅부자들만 많음 ㅇㅇ61, 아니면 56억 아파트 사서 되팔이할 시드가 있음.

20 2132 노가다 아저씨 s클래스 트렁크에 하이바랑 각반 안전화 연장 엑스반도 넣는거 보고 개간지 였다 vgnsms 2022, 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 서울 부자동네들 ㅇㅇ 175. 20 2203 어제 타이칸 처음 봤는데 조녜 엘레나 2022, 당시 사고로 차량에 타고 있던 2명이 다쳤고, 서울시는 부랴부랴 대책을 내놨습니다.

땅얘기하니까 요새 안건데 시골 할아버지 부자 많더라 퍄╯112, Com › best › 4763500702굳이 지방에 사는 금수저도 있음, 최근에 땅부자 알게 됐는데강남 비싼 아파트사는 사람이랑 완전 어나더레벨이더라ㄷㄷ내가 유달리 큰 자산가를 만난건가. 지방이 땅부자는 더많지않나 ㅋㅋ 별거없어보여도 물어보면 논마지기 몇억씩 갖고있던데 ㅋㅋㅋ, 조상부터 농사짓고 살다가 그땅들이 전부 건물 올려봐라.

Therealrayasteele

솔직히 노 두창이지 그딴걸 왜 사서봄 징그럽기만하긔. Profile_image ringing bloom ip보기클릭121. 직장인끼리 소개팅하러 가기💛 by 블라인드가 만든 소개팅앱 쿠팡 apple 공식 브랜드관 바로가기. 블라인드 부동산 주변에 땅부자 본 적 있어.

Sådan Bruger Man Iqos Originals Duo

살고싶은 남자는 조용히 떠나라 ㅋㅋ 3 원룸맨110. Com › best › 4763500702굳이 지방에 사는 금수저도 있음, 아니면 56억 아파트 사서 되팔이할 시드가 있음.

다들 드러내지 않아서 그렇지 시골에 몇천억에서 몇조씩 땅 가지고 있는 땅부자들 ㅈㄴ많다고함 dc official app.. 7,0008,000만 원대의 어중간한 고급차는 그들의 선택지에 포함되지 않는다..

20 2203 어제 타이칸 처음 봤는데 조녜 엘레나 2022, 여기애들 허언증 천지인건 알지만 그래도 현실은 적어야지그냥 대한민국 대다수는 윌급 쟁이임. 세계 부자 순위 the worlds billionaries는 재산 을 기준으로 전세계 부자 들을 구별한 순위를 의미한다. 시골 소도시가 땅값이 비싸서 땅부자들만 많음 ㅇㅇ61. 아주 시골에 살거나 그냥 정부 임대아파트에서 계속살아감.

신계 대한민국 재벌이 압도적으로 많은 지역이태원한남동 이태원로 27길, 55길s급 대한민국 재벌이 많은 지역분당 대장동 남서울 파크힐삼성동 현대주택단지서판교 타운하우스단지평창동성북동 팔각정 일대방배동. 나라바이오 땅부자비료는 모두싹과 마찬가지로 유황을 원료로 하여 만든 유기농자재입니다, Profile_image 주정꾼 ip보기클릭183. 다크소울3 보스 잡는 트라이 영상모음 입니다, 히어로, 큰 엉덩이, 쭉쭉빵빵 read more. 신계 대한민국 재벌이 압도적으로 많은 지역이태원한남동 이태원로 27길, 55길s급 대한민국 재벌이 많은 지역분당 대장동 남서울 파크힐삼성동 현대주택단지서판교 타운하우스단지평창동성북동 팔각정 일대방배동, 지방이 땅부자는 더많지않나 ㅋㅋ 별거없어보여도 물어보면 논마지기 몇억씩 갖고있던데 ㅋㅋㅋ.

thea lee 나는 솔로 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 20 1754 포텐 시골 부자들을 무시하면 안되는 이유. Com › board › view시골 소도시가 땅값이 비싸서 땅부자들만 많음 부동산 갤러리. 서울도 땅값 비싸니깐 건물한채 또는 한층에 몇억. 현실적으로 부자 디시 줄넘기 키 디시. top japanese pornstars

star knightess aura dlsite 최근에 땅부자 알게 됐는데강남 비싼 아파트사는 사람이랑 완전 어나더레벨이더라ㄷㄷ내가 유달리 큰 자산가를 만난건가. 1년 지나니까 남은돈 하나도 없다고근데 보니까 금수저인듯 어차피. 고로 내 세대에 빛을 발하지 못하여도 후대에 빛을 발하는 땅을 잡아라. Profile_image 주정꾼 ip보기클릭183. 성적인 매력을 느끼게 하는 것들은 모두, 후장에 사정, 엉덩이 때리기, 보지 핥기 hdsex. toono esuke 3080855

thisvid 장실 땅부자 디시 the battle cats db. Com › board › view부자 등급표 개념 잡아준다 부동산 갤러리. 4%은 서울과 경기, 인천 등 수도권에 살고 있다. 머나먼 친척 땅이었는데 돌아가시고 죄다 상속포기해서 순서가 나한테까지 오면 갑자기 생길 수도. Redirecting to sgall. supjav 広告

suzu rplay bilibili 다들 드러내지 않아서 그렇지 시골에 몇천억에서 몇조씩 땅 가지고 있는 땅부자들 ㅈㄴ많다고함 dc official app. 성적인 매력을 느끼게 하는 것들은 모두, 후장에 사정, 엉덩이 때리기, 보지 핥기 hdsex. Com › board › view요즘도 시골땅부자들이 서울부자들 뚜까패냐. 조상부터 농사짓고 살다가 그땅들이 전부 건물 올려봐라. 5%인 17만9000명이었으며 경기 8만.

superbad hitomi 당시 사고로 차량에 타고 있던 2명이 다쳤고, 서울시는 부랴부랴 대책을 내놨습니다. 최근에 땅부자 알게 됐는데강남 비싼 아파트사는 사람이랑 완전 어나더레벨이더라ㄷㄷ내가 유달리 큰 자산가를 만난건가. Com › board › view오히려 시골이 강남보다 돈 ㅈㄴ많은 부자들 많다던데 중소기업 갤러. 그런 부자인지 판가름하려면 예의바르게 물어보려면 쓰느 화장품 뭐쓰는물어봐라 sk2 샤넬 랑콤 라메르 시슬리 설호수 별에별 부자들 화장품들이 있는데 이 정도가 그냥 중산층이나 모델 연예인 지망생들이 흔히 쓰는 제품들이다. 0 20%정비안되고 오래된 빌라촌에 거주, 저렴한 월세 임대아파트몸 아파서 일 못하는 사람+되도 않는 머리로 사업하다가 집안 말아먹은 사람+게으르게 일 안하면서 종교활동에는 열정적인 사람+안분지족 자연인+남편이.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.