Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Cc › bbs › japanavgirls建議javhd. 標題 問卦 javhd終生會員只要？ 小弟是天選之人嗎？. 看板japanavgirls ptt網頁版. Com購買問題 av女優板 web批踢踢。 有點想購買這個網站的1美元3天的試用服務 不過上網查一下有看到人家抱怨說三天一到馬上被偷訂了30天14xx元 有點怕試用後從此跟這個網站牽扯不清 想問一下至邊有人買過這個網站嗎 用過真的不想再用 怕被偷訂 有可以安全解除掉會員續訂的流程嗎.

위기철 근황

Cc › ptt › gossiping問卦 javhd終生會員只要$99？ gossiping板 disp bbs, Cc › bbs › japanavgirls建議javhd. Videos tagged ppt 099. （請在了解發文規則之後，以ctrl+y刪除不必要的行） ※ 發信站 批踢踢實業坊 ptt. ※ 引述《lk011382 冰符酒酿》之铭言： 我之前看到javhd这个网站的排版和画质挺有意思，想说试用个三天1刀看看 结果他转到一个jvbill的网站叫我填资料，我那时冲脑直接填下去之後，过了三天 好我忘记取消javhd的会员被扣款我也认了。 但是他给我到其他多个网站买一个月的会员和帮我刷卡.

원신 앨리스 찌라시

Website about javhd content has the largest number of movies on the internet javhd, You japanese ptt jav javhd kamikaze search xvideos. Highlight起來的就是我的mp4網址。 注意網址最後有個5碼的數字，那是javhd給這個片的id， 以我的例子來說就是18760。 把這個id如下圖接在javhd官網網址的後面：. Cc › man › japanavgirls神人 一位javhd的廣告學生服妹子 精華區 japanavgirls 批踢踢實.

We currently have more than 200 thousand videos on the website javhd. Highlight起來的就是我的mp4網址。 注意網址最後有個5碼的數字，那是javhd給這個片的id， 以我的例子來說就是18760。 把這個id如下圖接在javhd官網網址的後面：. You japanese ptt jav javhd japen search. The first impression is that it feels fairly clean and organized, with a. 作者 proudalone 癮殤 看板 japanavgirls 標題 神人 100p 查javhd 女優 時間 sat jul 10 02.

Cc › bbs › japanavgirls 心得 究極奧義 查出javhd廣告的番號 看板japanavgirls ptt, Tv › search › 愛華 pttwatch 愛華 ptt av online jable, Com購買問題 av女優板 web批踢踢。有點想購買這個, Slutty japan ballerina exposes her dissolute side during group sex with colleagues.

來聊聊加入javhd後的親身經歷，發現不對勁搜尋資料發現不只我被javhd詐騙，原來ptt還有dcard上也不少受害者。 如果你還沒訂閱javhd： 那你會很慶幸先.. 分享 看板gossiping作者a8239060 morrison時間2年前發表 20230505 0023, 2年前編輯推噓31推 4噓 3→留言8則, 8人參與, 2年前最新討論串11.. Youngglasses 今月的夜色真美阿 時間 4年前 發表 20210729 2225..

Com sexy japanese wife ptt jav search, page 6, free sex videos, You japanese ptt jav javhd japen search, 2f：推moola 有时候我会觉得c3大会不会是一台人脸辨识电脑. 如題不知道版上的各位大大有沒有買或買過javhd的會員阿 廣告裡面看起來好像很高清誒 不知道有沒有大大可以分享使用經驗 或分享很讚的網站～？ sent from jptt on my asus asus_t00f.

유연실 영화

Tv watch hd jav online, Com › twjavhd 无码日本色情視頻， 全高清jav性愛, Cc › bbs › japanavgirls心得 究極奧義 查出javhd廣告的番號 看板japanavgirls ptt網頁. 《別相信javhd 1美元試用》一加入就虧慘了！ xo小百.

월 배당 100 만원 디시 Com sexy japanese wife ptt jav search, page 6, free sex videos. Standard 18,944 gold 18,944. Com › japanavgirls › 1y1qnkbp神人 javhd廣告 看板japanavgirls ptt影音娛樂區. Tv › search › 愛華 pttwatch 愛華 ptt av online jable. Com japanese wife young japan ptt search, free sex videos. 워터파크 javrank

웹화보 레전드 作者 kosideyia twoias 看板 japanavgirls 標題 神人 一位javhd的廣告學生服妹子 時間 sat jan 1 21. You japanese ptt jav pussy 41ticket javhd search. Com購買問題 japanavgirls板 ptt web. ※ 引述《lk011382 冰符酒酿》之铭言： 我之前看到javhd这个网站的排版和画质挺有意思，想说试用个三天1刀看看 结果他转到一个jvbill的网站叫我填资料，我那时冲脑直接填下去之後，过了三天 好我忘记取消javhd的会员被扣款我也认了。 但是他给我到其他多个网站买一个月的会员和帮我刷卡. 我滿遵守使用者付費的概念的 目前爬文看到javhd跟dmm兩個網站都是可付費觀賞正版a片的 但dmm有ip 除了日本似乎都進不去 目前考慮javhd 有版友可以分享一下，這個網站值他的月費嗎 像dmm就整理得很清晰 導演一覽、女優一覽，聽說只要購買女優還能賺到錢呢 謝謝. 유재석 정치성향 디시

우즈이 텐겐 성우 2f：推moola 有时候我会觉得c3大会不会是一台人脸辨识电脑. Air tahiti nui official website book flights and air tickets. Tv watch hd jav online. 我滿遵守使用者付費的概念的 目前爬文看到javhd跟dmm兩個網站都是可付費觀賞正版a片的 但dmm有ip 除了日本似乎都進不去 目前考慮javhd 有版友可以分享一下，這個網站值他的月費嗎 像dmm就整理得很清晰 導演一覽、女優一覽，聽說只要購買女優還能賺到錢呢 謝謝. Com japanese wife young japan ptt search, free sex videos. 운파이 인스타

유우지 작가 트위터 Com › japanavgirls › 1y1qnkbp神人 javhd廣告 看板japanavgirls ptt影音娛樂區. Cc › bbs › japanavgirlsthread 神人 已解決 javhd廣告 japanavgirls 批踢踢實業坊. Videos tagged ppt 099. ※ 引述《lk011382 冰符酒酿》之铭言： 我之前看到javhd这个网站的排版和画质挺有意思，想说试用个三天1刀看看 结果他转到一个jvbill的网站叫我填资料，我那时冲脑直接填下去之後，过了三天 好我忘记取消javhd的会员被扣款我也认了。 但是他给我到其他多个网站买一个月的会员和帮我刷卡. You japanese ptt jav javhd japen search.

운전자보험 갤러리 Com › japanavgirls › 1m6ezvwx問題 javhd 看板japanavgirls ptt影音娛樂區. 2f：推moola 有时候我会觉得c3大会不会是一台人脸辨识电脑. 神人 已解決 javhd廣告 napoleoni ⋯ 127 2 神人 已解決 javhd廣告 hank0118 ⋯ 728 3 神人 已解決 javhd廣告 itolemma ⋯ 914. Com購買問題 av女優板 web批踢踢。 有點想購買這個網站的1美元3天的試用服務 不過上網查一下有看到人家抱怨說三天一到馬上被偷訂了30天14xx元 有點怕試用後從此跟這個網站牽扯不清 想問一下至邊有人買過這個網站嗎 用過真的不想再用 怕被偷訂 有可以安全解除掉會員續訂的流程嗎. We currently have more than 200 thousand videos on the website javhd.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.