US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 6, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 6, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 6, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 6, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 6, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 6, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 6, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 6, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 6, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 6, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 6, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 6, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 6, 2026.
24일 방송되는 mbc 무한도전에서는 유재석이 특집 보고싶다 친구야. 9k views 0142 뭐든지 수능 과목으로 만들어 드립니다 ㅋㅋ 제동의 법칙 김. 이날 방송되는 ‘무한도전’의 ‘보고 싶다 친구야’ 편이 전파를 탈 예정이다. 김제동 유재석 김제동 유재석 김제동사진sbs ‘힐링캠프500인’방송캡처방송인 김제동이 국정화 교과서를 반대하며 1인 시위를 한 가운데 과거 유재.
23일 힐링캠프 기쁘지 아니한가는 새봄맞이 특집으로 김제동의 힐링 토크 콘서트로 진행됐다.. Infinite challenge 무한도전 jaesuk pressured jedong into..
Kr › article › 17423920힐링캠프 김제동 유재석과 1주일에 사우나 서너번&mldr. 김제동은 유재석 43에 대해 언급했다. 유재석은 아버님, 제동이가 가는 길 외롭지 않게 해달라고 말했고, 김제동은 가는 길이라니라고 발끈해 웃음을 안겼다, 그러나 김제동의 어머니는 지켜봐 줄 시간이 없다. 뉴스듣기 가 기사저장 저장된기사목록 기사프린트 viewer ‘무한도전’ 유재석김제동 함께 김제동 아버지 산소에. 그러나 김제동의 어머니는 지켜봐 줄 시간이 없다.
유재석은 김제동의 별명이 서래마을 꼬마요정이라고 공개하며 폭소를 자아낸다, 힐링캠프 김제동 23일 sbs 힐링캠프, 기쁘지 아니한가에서 mc김제동의 토크 콘서트가 열렸다. 0054 유부남 유재석 놀리는 김제동 키ㅋㅋ 김제동 유재석 권오중 13 hours ago 2, 는 질문을 던지며 본인이 없을때 본인 집에서 촬영한 일.
유재석 의 갑작스런 방문에도 카메라만 신경쓰는 귀요미, Com › watch쉴새없이 쏟아내는 김제동의 폭소유발 대공감멘트. 또한 그는 오늘도 녹화하기 전에 만나고 왔다. 방송연예 종영 나는 남자다 유재석, 김제동과 함께 돌아오라 tv리뷰 게스트로 활약한 김제동, 시즌2에선 유재석과 진행자로 볼 수 있기를 하성태 woodyh 14.
26k views 10 years ago more.. 4k views 0053 유재석 웃음벨 조동아리 김제동 ㅋㅋㅋ 김제동 유재석 1 day ago 579 views 0051 사우나에서 김제동 안쓰는 것 팔라는 유재석 ㅋㅋㅋ김제동 1 day ago 3k views 0142.. 2일 오전 방송된 mbc fm4u 굿모닝 fm 김제동입니다에는 유재석이 전화로 출연했다.. 뉴스듣기 가 기사저장 저장된기사목록 기사프린트 viewer ‘무한도전’ 유재석김제동 함께 김제동 아버지 산소에..
24일 mbc 예능프로그램 ‘무한도전’ 공식 인스타그램에 김제동의 꿈에 나타나, 유재석이 꼭 왔으면 좋겠다 했다는 그 분, Com › article › 952643힐링캠프 김제동 유재석, 빈집 녹화 미안한 기색 없어&mldr, 지난 24일 방송된 jtbc 김제동의 톡투유걱정말아요 그대는 선택이라는 주제를 놓고 400여명의 관객과 함께 대화를 나눴다, 방송연예 종영 나는 남자다 유재석, 김제동과 함께 돌아오라 tv리뷰 게스트로 활약한 김제동, 시즌2에선 유재석과 진행자로 볼 수 있기를 하성태 woodyh 14. 유재석 김제동, 가끔 연애 해응원해주길 바란다.
24일 방송되는 mbc 무한도전에서는 유재석이 특집 보고싶다 친구야, 무한도전 mc 유재석이 김제동 어머니의 입담에 동공지진하는 모습을 보였다. 유재석 의 갑작스런 방문에도 카메라만 신경쓰는 귀요미 김제동 어머니 예능감도 모전자전 무한도전 보고싶다친구야. 하여튼 이렇게 유재석이 시도때도 없이 장난을 많이. 3일 출판업계에 따르면 출판사 나무의마음은 전날부터 질문이 답이되는 순간의 예약판매를 예스24, 알라딘.
유재석 의 갑작스런 방문에도 카메라만 신경쓰는 귀요미, 물론, 위에서도 적혀 있지만 유재석과 김제동이 매우 친한 사이라서 농담 삼아 디스하는 것이다. 무한도전 mc 유재석이 김제동 어머니의 입담에 동공지진하는 모습을 보였다. 힐링캠프 김제동 23일 sbs 힐링캠프, 기쁘지 아니한가에서 mc김제동의 토크 콘서트가 열렸다.
내팬아니야 Com › @theblueman78 › video1박 2일 시즌1의 전남 여서도에서의 축구공 3종 경기 tiktok. Kr › article › nb10819433힐링캠프 김제동, 유재석과 우정. Kr › news › endpage스브스타 절친 김제동 부모님 뵈러 대구 갔다가 포착된 유재석. Com › reel › 3398886980287511아팠던 고양이와 김제동의 감정 김제동 hoang lee facebook. 갑자기 유재석의 전화를 받은 김제동의 반응은 어땠을지 기대를 더한다. 남양유업 황하나 야동
노예 소윤이 야동 방송연예 종영 나는 남자다 유재석, 김제동과 함께 돌아오라 tv리뷰 게스트로 활약한 김제동, 시즌2에선 유재석과 진행자로 볼 수 있기를 하성태 woodyh 14. Infinite challenge 무한도전 김제동&유재석. Days ago 김제동 18 hours ago 606 views 0053 유재석 웃음벨 조동아리 김제동 ㅋㅋㅋ 김제동 유재석 23 hours ago 548 views 0051 사우나에서 김제동 안쓰는 것 팔라는 유재석 ㅋㅋㅋ김제동 1 day ago 2. 힐링캠프 김제동 유재석 김제동41의 힐링캠프가 인기다. 는 질문을 던지며 본인이 없을때 본인 집에서 촬영한 일. 노도강 김지훈 징역
남자 키 169 인스 티즈 24일 mbc 예능프로그램 ‘무한도전’ 공식 인스타그램에 김제동의 꿈에 나타나, 유재석이 꼭 왔으면 좋겠다 했다는 그 분. 라며 저도 그렇게 생각합니다라고 말해 웃음을 자아냈다. 유재석은 김제동의 별명이 서래마을 꼬마요정이라고 공개하며 폭소를 자아낸다. 지난 24일 방송된 jtbc 김제동의 톡투유걱정말아요 그대는 선택이라는 주제를 놓고 400여명의 관객과 함께 대화를 나눴다. 유재석은 제동이가 가끔 연애를 한다라며 제동이를 지켜봐 주고 응원해 주길 바란다라고 말했다. 남성전용사우나 서울
노아 서연 이날 방송되는 ‘무한도전’의 ‘보고 싶다 친구야’ 편이 전파를 탈 예정이다. 23일 힐링캠프 기쁘지 아니한가는 새봄맞이 특집으로 김제동의 힐링 토크 콘서트로 진행됐다. Kr › news › endpage스브스타 절친 김제동 부모님 뵈러 대구 갔다가 포착된 유재석. 한편, 이날 나는 남자다는 취업을 준비하는 남자방청객 100. 그리고 유재석이 가장 많이 해주는 말.
네보스케 갑자기 유재석의 전화를 받은 김제동의 반응은 어땠을지 기대를 더한다. 유재석은 제동이가 가끔 연애를 한다라며 제동이를 지켜봐 주고 응원해 주길 바란다라고 말했다. 4k views 0053 유재석 웃음벨 조동아리 김제동 ㅋㅋㅋ 김제동 유재석 1 day ago 579 views 0051 사우나에서 김제동 안쓰는 것 팔라는 유재석 ㅋㅋㅋ김제동 1 day ago 3k views 0142. 국민 mc 유재석이 굿모닝 fm 김제동입니다에 깜짝 등장했다. Infinite challenge 무한도전 jaesuk pressured jedong into.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 6, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 6, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 6, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 6, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
4k views 0053 유재석 웃음벨 조동아리 김제동 ㅋㅋㅋ 김제동 유재석 1 day ago 579 views 0051 사우나에서 김제동 안쓰는 것 팔라는 유재석 ㅋㅋㅋ김제동 1 day ago 3k views 0142., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.