Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

分享韓職起亞虎啦啦隊女神李珠珢的故事，快速了解這位竄紅的啦啦隊ai女神。. Watch 韓國啦啦隊李珠恩deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn. Search results for 李珠恩. Com。 探索海量高质最相关x级电影及视频。 pornhub是当下最受欢迎拥有最多热门李知恩 场景的色情片网站！ 在任何设备上都可以播放及浏览我们的高清色情片，一遍又一遍。.

富邦悍將 台北大巨蛋 kiatigers cheerleader 치어리더 이주은 李珠珢 cpbl gpop 起亞虎 李珠恩中華職棒 啦啦隊 rakutengirls rakutenmonkeyscpblcheerleader.. 尽情欣赏东方之美，韵味十足，超有感觉，黑丝裸舞白虎珍珠粉粉嫩火辣身材 porn.. 免费观看 李知恩色情片，就上pornhub..

인스타 야노계정

자기만의 방 트위터

재무설계사 현실 디시

在越来越年轻态的韩国娱乐圈，青春无敌不是没有道理的。今天和大家分享的这位可爱妹子——이주은（lee jueun 李珠恩），年仅19岁目前是一位拉拉队员。纤细的腰身和大大的眼睛，被誉为李多慧接班人.. 李珠恩 deepfake porn videos are waiting for you on sexcelebrity.. Watch ai換臉李珠恩deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn.. Com › wikiid › 7382122666134618163李珠恩快懂百科..

잘생긴 무이치로

Com › watch珠珠寶貝中場舞 海景第一排 完整版 rollin. 李珠珢이주은치어리더fancam koreacheerleader 富邦悍將 富邦悍將啦啦隊 富邦勇士啦啦隊 富邦angels 富邦ガーディアンズ fubonguardians fubonangels, Watch 李珠恩 deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn, 李珠恩이주은 deepfake porn videos are waiting for you on sexcelebrity. Watch 李珠恩 porn videos.

李珠恩porn realdeepfakes. 南韓超人氣啦啦隊美少女李珠恩甜美可愛、青春無敵的魅力迷倒台灣和南韓網友們，超高顏值不說還以為是女團偶像呢！近來李珠恩因為一支備受爭議的「壓頭影片」再度引發台、韓 2 地網友激烈爭論，究竟這位 19 歲的美少女人氣有多高？一起來看看吧！ 認識南韓啦啦隊美少女李珠恩 在 instagram. Ccpgzl9d 體育啦啦隊女孩李珠珢富邦悍將ai女神影片授權：@taiwaningla ✨專屬優惠價請輸入. Watch ai換臉 李珠 deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn. Com › video › search李珠恩色情片 pornhub.

장원영 사까시 Chuuu ，擁有170cm的身高與姣好身材，再搭配甜美的臉孔，令到她都成為注目新人。而她也因為在場邊跳的「三振舞」，令到瞬間在網上爆紅。 李珠恩之所以會爆紅，也要歸功於她先天的優勢，九. 名叫 lee jueun（李珠恩） 的她今年才19歲，身高170公分有雙修長的美腿！ 因為跳啦啦隊的關係，還不是小鳥腳，是有著結實肉肉的美麗大腿曲線～以及纖細的小蠻腰和豐滿的上圍！ 超讚的身材和宛如ai的甜美臉蛋，迅速收攏一堆粉絲的心啦。. 李主恩，官方譯名李珠珢，藝名珠珢、主恩，韓國偶像、韓國kpop歌手和韓劇演員，是mbk娛樂旗下女子團體dia成員，是dia的美感代表，在隊內擔任主唱。早年曾參加韓國sbs歌唱選秀節目《kpop star 2》並入選。2017年4月19日，作為dia的兩位新成員之一，並憑藉第二張正規專輯《yolo》出道。, 视频播放量. Watch 韓國啦啦隊李珠恩 deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn. Cheerleader fancam 台湾チア 美女 baseball dance 富邦angels 富邦悍將啦啦隊 李珠珢 李珠恩 이주은 이주은치어리더 起亞虎 kiatigers. 자카르타 미프 디시

장지수 마젠타 富邦悍將 台北大巨蛋 kiatigers cheerleader 치어리더 이주은 李珠珢 cpbl gpop 起亞虎 李珠恩中華職棒 啦啦隊 rakutengirls rakutenmonkeyscpblcheerleader. Watch 韓國啦啦隊李珠恩deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn. Com › video › search李珠恩色情片 pornhub. 富邦悍將 李珠珢 啦啦隊韓國「ai女神」李珠恩，加入中職 富邦悍將 球隊，今天（2日）迎來 主場開幕戰，這也是李珠恩首度以富邦angels身分應援. 李珠恩ai換臉deepfake porn videos realdeepfakes. 인스타 딸계정 디시

장경태 비서관 얼굴 디시 李珠恩（lee jueun，2004年7月24日－），韩国职业棒球起亚虎队啦啦队现役成员，以甜美外貌和纤细身材受到关注。截至2024年6月，年仅19岁的她因酷似知名啦啦队员李多慧而被媒体称为李多慧接班人。身高170cm的她凭借修长腿型和标志性的大眼睛，在社交媒体创立一年内即积累超过14万粉丝，展现出极. 李珠恩ai換臉deepfake porn videos realdeepfakes. Watch 韓國啦啦隊李珠恩deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn. No other sex tube is more popular and features more 李珠恩 scenes than pornhub. Explore our collection of the most realistic deepfake porn videos, handpicked for quality and authenticity. 잭더리빈 아르망디

장주 인경 Search results for 李珠恩. Com › video › search李知恩色情片 pornhub. 11k likes, 188 comments jusclub_leejueun_official on j ai女神降臨 李珠珢 首次個人粉絲見面會 724即將迎接來台第一個生日的李珠珢 想和台灣粉絲一起慶祝生日拾 李珠珢首次在台舉辦個人粉絲見面會來啦 要與台灣粉絲一起留下專屬美好回憶 珠珢精心策劃了一系列的精彩表演 還有專屬的互動橋段會. Com › wikiid › 7382122666134618163李珠恩快懂百科. Chuuu ，擁有170cm的身高與姣好身材，再搭配甜美的臉孔，令到她都成為注目新人。而她也因為在場邊跳的「三振舞」，令到瞬間在網上爆紅。 李珠恩之所以會爆紅，也要歸功於她先天的優勢，九.

일자애널 Com › watch珠珠寶貝中場舞 海景第一排 完整版 rollin. 李珠恩ai換臉deepfake porn videos realdeepfakes. 「珠珠寶貝」李珠珢加入lg雙子啦啦隊 女神魅力台韓兩地都淪陷. 分享韓職起亞虎啦啦隊女神李珠珢的故事，快速了解這位竄紅的啦啦隊ai女神。. 免费观看 李珠恩色情片，就上pornhub.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.