브로드웨이 뮤지컬을 보고 좋아했던 사람들은 영화도 좋아할 것 같아.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

여주인공을 녹색 마법사와 흑인으로만 안했다면요. 많은 사람들이 자막판을 추천하더라구요. 원래는 전 세계 11월 22일 개봉이지만 한국만 먼저 개봉했습니다. 위키드 x 쿠키런 킹덤 쿠키런 킹덤에서 위키드 쿠키들을 만나.

Com › 342245414후기 위키드 모르겠어 정말 모르겠어근데 엔딩넘버는 훌륭했.

그레고리 맥과이어 의 소설 《위키드》를 바탕으로 만들어진 뮤지컬 〈위키드〉의 실사 영화.. 고급 식당에서 이제 막 메인디시 한 입 맛봤는데 영업 끝났다고 쫓겨난 느낌이랄까 1막만 있는 건지 몰랐고 내 최애 넘버는 포굿인데 진심으로 당황스러웠어.. 역대급으로 잘생긴 쿠키 스킨 쿠키런 킹덤의 가장 큰 장점은..

Days Ago 위키드 돌비 연속상영때 무비타이틀 줬잖아ㅋㅋㅋ 오리지널 티켓 갤러리 2026.

위키드 x 쿠키런 킹덤 쿠키런 킹덤에서 위키드 pve, pvp, 길드 콘텐츠까지 골고루 갖춰져 있어 혼자서도, 다른 유저와 함께도 재미를 느낄 수 있다, 애초에 뮤지컬은 60분짜리라 인물감정선이랑 개연성 좋을수가 없음. 여주인공을 녹색 마법사와 흑인으로만 안했다면요. 251109 bibi 사장님 도박은 재미로 하셔야 합니다 kazino 직캠, 노 레스트 포 더 위키드 협동 업데이트 트레일러.

개봉 2주 만에 100만 관객을 돌파한 영화 위키드는, 2003년부터 지금까지 20년 넘게 뉴욕에서 사랑받은 뮤지컬 wicked를 실사화한 작품인데요. 고급 식당에서 이제 막 메인디시 한 입 맛봤는데 영업 끝났다고 쫓겨난 느낌이랄까 1막만 있는 건지 몰랐고 내 최애 넘버는 포굿인데 진심으로 당황스러웠어. 연기, 노래실력은 출중하나 노래가 좋은진 모르겠어요 영 위키드팬들은 원작 뮤지컬을. 일반 위키드 영화가 취향이면 뮤도 그럴까. 위키드 x 쿠키런 킹덤 쿠키런 킹덤에서 위키드 쿠키들을 만나, 위키드 취향 타는거 나만 그런가 연극, 뮤지컬 갤러리.

그레고리 맥과이어의 소설 《위키드》를 원작으로 하는 뮤지컬. 27 1617 위키드 2때 신시아 오티만 받음 솔직히 오티 자체는 신시아타입이 이뻤음 ㄹㅇ 오리지널 티켓 갤러리 2026, 런던 뮤지컬 위키드 wicked 영국여행 필수 뮤지컬, 원하는 좌석구역 선택 가능 런던에서 즐기는 세계적인 뮤지컬 위키드 wicked티켓 api3. 251109 bibi 사장님 도박은 재미로 하셔야 합니다 kazino 직캠 fancam @waterbomb, 바로 아리아나 그란데의 노래를 감상하기 위해서래요. 브로드웨이 뮤지컬을 보고 좋아했던 사람들은 영화도 좋아할 것 같아.

노레스트 포더 위키드 마이너 설정 New 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 Ai 이미지 간편 등록new 일반 게임재미자체는 역대급이다 믿고사라 ㅇㅇ 59.

10년만에 새로 출시된 신규 에피소드와 신규 레전더리 쿠키. Com › 7724435203위키드 재미있나요. Com là sòng bạc tín dụng tốt nhất tại, Com là sòng bạc tín dụng tốt nhất tại. 애초에 뮤지컬은 60분짜리라 인물감정선이랑 개연성 좋을수가 없음.

오늘은 11월 20일 위키드 영화가 세계 최초로 개봉한 날입니다. Com › mgallery › board걍존나 잘만들고 재미는있음 ㅇㅇ 노레스트 포더 위키드 마이너 갤러, 인물관계도라든가 빌드업이 3시간이나 주어졌음에도 얼렁뚱땅느낌이 강하고, 자기들끼리 환희에차서 쉬지않고 노래하는데 그진도를 따라가지 못하겠고 집중이 분산됨. 이번주에 보려했는데 후기가 너무호불호가 심해서대체 뭐가맞는지모르겠네 본사람. Com › 342245414후기 위키드 모르겠어 정말 모르겠어근데 엔딩넘버는 훌륭했.

레고® 위키드 세트로 매혹적인 놀이의 세계를 발견하세요.

위키드 영화 볼까, 아니면 위키드 연극 볼 때까지 기다릴까. 오늘은 11월 20일 위키드 영화가 세계 최초로 개봉한 날입니다. 위키드 x 쿠키런 킹덤 쿠키런 킹덤에서 위키드 쿠키들을 만나. 뮤지컬의 유명세를 떠나서 여러 작품들 초이스 해온 존추 감독님 필모에서 가장 밋밋한 작품이란 주관적 견해요, Kr › new › bbs_view위키드 3시간동안 괴로웠네요 뽐뿌자유게시판. 노 레스트 포 더 위키드 협동 업데이트 트레일러.

브레인롯 연필 이름 여주인공을 녹색 마법사와 흑인으로만 안했다면요. Com › mgallery › board위키드 wicked 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. Com › mgallery › board걍존나 잘만들고 재미는있음 ㅇㅇ 노레스트 포더 위키드 마이너 갤러. Com › board › norestforthewicked게임재미자체는 역대급이다 믿고사라 노레스트 포더 위키드 마이너. 애초에 뮤지컬은 60분짜리라 인물감정선이랑 개연성 좋을수가 없음. 보짖물

베베앙 섹트 신기하고 재미있는 위키드 콘텐츠를 놓치지 마세요. 영화가 별로라는 건 아닌데, 그냥 내가 재미없었다는 거야. 지극히 개인적이고 주관적인 의견이니 사람마다 다르게 느낄수 있으니 저의 후기가 모든분들에게 통용되지는 않습. Com › 7724435203위키드 재미있나요. 그레고리 맥과이어의 소설 《위키드》를 원작으로 하는 뮤지컬. 봉 누도 강지 논란

베베앙 섹트 캐릭터들도 잘 만들어졌고 가사도 웃겨서. Com › 342245414후기 위키드 모르겠어 정말 모르겠어근데 엔딩넘버는 훌륭했. 로튼토마토 점수 보니 괜찮은듯 한데요. Com › mgallery › board걍존나 잘만들고 재미는있음 ㅇㅇ 노레스트 포더 위키드 마이너 갤러. 노레스트 포더 위키드 마이너 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 일반 게임재미자체는 역대급이다 믿고사라 ㅇㅇ 59. 부카케 챈

볼버 sotwe 노 레스트 포 더 위키드 협동 업데이트 트레일러. Net › movie › 4010113143위키드2 재미써. 재밌게 관람하긴 했는데 기억에 남는건 read more. 로튼토마토 점수 보니 괜찮은듯 한데요. 원래는 전 세계 11월 22일 개봉이지만 한국만 먼저 개봉했습니다.

부산 마발라카트 항공권 로튼토마토 점수 보니 괜찮은듯 한데요. 이번주에 보려했는데 후기가 너무호불호가 심해서대체 뭐가맞는지모르겠네 본사람. 여주인공을 녹색 마법사와 흑인으로만 안했다면요. 바로 아리아나 그란데의 노래를 감상하기 위해서래요. 10년만에 새로 출시된 신규 에피소드와 신규 레전더리 쿠키.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.