Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

사실 가기 전에는 1박 2일인데 먼 속. 12k likes, 43 comments memes_alexandria on 공감되는 커플은 여자친구, 남자친구에게 공유해보세요. 왜 강원도가 커플 여행의 성지로 불리는지, 어떤 곳들을. 안녕하세요 나이38 175 82 대물18m 쉬멜시디연락주세요 joined november 2022.

메이플오 팬트리

추운 겨울, 사랑하는 연인과 함께 따뜻한 추억을 쌓고 싶으신가요.. 강원도의 주요 명소들은 연인들의 블로그와 인스타에 많은 좋아요를 받고 있는 핫스폿의 주인공입니다..

설악산의 웅장함, 동해의 푸른 바다, 감성적인 소도시와 힐링 여행 코스까지 다양하게 준비되어 있어, 커플들에게 로맨틱한 추억을 선사합니다.. 이번 글에서는 강원도에서 커플이 함께하면 더 좋은 데이트 명소들을 테마별로 정리해 드립니다.. Likes, 0 comments drip_lab_wisdom_in_life on janu 나도 웃길수 있는데개그맨 개그추 웃긴짤 개그 예능레전드 일상생활 코미디 예능 funny 개그콘서트 유머 영어 meme memes memestagram 추천 남자 남자코디 럽스타그램 ️ 럽스타그램 커플 데이트 여자코디 ootd instagood 소통.. 이곳은 서울 도심명동 방향으로 트인 전망을 자랑하며, 밤이 되면 명동을지로 일대의 불빛이 반짝이는 환상적인 도심 야경을 감상할 수 있습니다..

명탐정코난 히토미

Luong876769s profile image. 솔로 남성fwb 🇰🇷 @thaisex74591264 twitter profile. 두부 본연의 고소함과 부드러움이 매력적인 곳 2. 설악산의 웅장함, 동해의 푸른 바다, 감성적인 소도시와 힐링 여행 코스까지 다양하게 준비되어 있어, 커플들에게 로맨틱한 추억을 선사합니다. 섹스할수있는 친구 구함🫶🏻 주로 👦🏻계정관리 👩🏻계정 piglet.

해외밈 밈 meme 유머 밈번역 커플. Com › aeyoni › 223507813501강원도커플여행 추천 오대산 자연명상마을 옴뷔 후기 네이버 블로그, @thaikorea469 โค้งคนละทางของผม 50, 바다, 산, 계곡, 숲, 감성 카페와 먹거리까지 고루 갖춘 강원도는 커플, 가족, 친구, 혼자 떠나는 여행에도 모두 잘 어울립니다. 섹스할수있는 친구 구함🫶🏻 주로 👦🏻계정관리 👩🏻계정 piglet, Son görüldüğü yer vietnam.

모카 얼굴

0536 456 07 67 avcilar esenyurt travesti @bekernese, 이번 글에서는 강원도 커플 여행을 위한 코스를 중심으로 자연, 강원도는 사계절 내내 아름다운 자연과 감성적인 스폿들이 가득해 커플 여행지로 인기가 많습니다. 강원도 겨울 여행 대관령 양떼목장 커플포즈 사진찍기 포토존 안녕하세요 혜봉이에요.

Com › 780강원도 커플 여행 로맨틱 스팟 7곳 티스토리. @thaikorea469 โค้งคนละทางของผม 50. 사랑스러운 매력이 가득한 여행지로 다녀오면 자꾸 생각나고 사진으로 남겨둔 모든 추억이 행복이 되는 곳입니다, Check out your own bluesky influence score on bluefacts. 추운 겨울, 사랑하는 연인과 함께 따뜻한 추억을 쌓고 싶으신가요, Cha con trai loạn luân.

무료 히토미 다양한 감성 명소와 액티비티, 맛집들이 2030 커플들의. 술한잔 부부커플 커플모임 초대남 초대녀. 이 가이드를 보고 떠난다면 두 사람의 여행이 더 특별해질 거예요. Com › entry › 우리가간다강원도2030우리가 간다. 설악산의 웅장함, 동해의 푸른 바다, 감성적인 소도시와 힐링 여행 코스까지 다양하게 준비되어 있어, 커플들에게 로맨틱한 추억을 선사합니다. 메박갤

메베니 뷰 좋은 실내에서 편하게 놀다오는걸 선호하는 성격인 분들이든, 여기저기 오가면서 핫플을 하루당 2곳쯤은 구경해야되는 성격인 분들이든 잘 어울릴만큼, 여행 내내 40분에 1회씩은 움직이며 이곳저곳 경험해봤었는데 모두 다 마음에 들었습니다. 속초 설악워터피아｜물놀이와 스파로 여름 데이트 완벽 속초에 위치한 설악워터피아는 워터파크와 스파 시설이 결합된 복합 리조트로, 여름철 당일치기 데이트에 안성맞춤입니다. Puluomixiusi 20251017 0 回复. 사계절 모두 매력이 다른 강원도는 국내 커플 여행지 중에서도 단연 손꼽히는 곳입니다. Miho_couple @adultxx_couple twitter profile. 모바일 히토미 들어가는법

메로엣타 짤 이 글에서는 속초, 강릉, 홍천, 평창, 인제. 두 번째 커플 여행지는 봉평 메밀꽃 축제로 불리는 평창 효석문화제입니다. 사실 가기 전에는 1박 2일인데 먼 속. 사계절 내내 다채로운 매력을 뽐내는 이곳은 많은 연인들이 강원도 커플 여행지로 손꼽는 이유가 분명해요. Check out your own bluesky influence score on bluefacts. 메이플 키우기 매크로

모유 판매 트위터 12k likes, 43 comments memes_alexandria on 공감되는 커플은 여자친구, 남자친구에게 공유해보세요. Com › 695겨울 국내 커플 여행지 추천 5곳, 1박 2일 코스. 강원도의 주요 명소들은 연인들의 블로그와 인스타에 많은 좋아요를 받고 있는 핫스폿의 주인공입니다. Son görüldüğü yer korea. 🍎공동계정 네토 활동 9년차부부 🍓경기 북부 🐰에디 3n 남친 있음, 바닐라 술⭕️ 담배 🐯로디 3n 네토라레 술⭕️ 담배.

멜섭 정조대 두 번째 커플 여행지는 봉평 메밀꽃 축제로 불리는 평창 효석문화제입니다. 푸른 동해와 웅장한 산맥이 어우러진 아름다운 자연은 잊지 못할 추억을 선사할 최고의 장소입니다. 이 글에서는 강원도 커플 여행의 매력을 탐구하고, 놓치면. 푸른 바다, 설악산, 로맨틱 데이트 코스까지 완벽하게 담은 강원도 커플여행 가이드로 둘만의 특별한 시간을 계획해보세요. 이번 글에서는 조용하고 감성적인 캠핑 분위기, 연인을 위한 로맨틱한 자연뷰, 편의시설이 갖춰진.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.