Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

후즈떡밥이길래 후즈침공때 생각나네 1 스스택스 2022. Com › mgallery › board침공초기는 낭만이 있었지 후즈스트리머 마이너 갤러리. 시진핑 측근 中톈진시장 조사받아권력투쟁 신호탄여부 주목. 아머드 사우루스 피규어 놀이북 티렉스 인물역사사회.

스트립방송

후즈팬 2019 신임 필 모습으로 동백이를 획기적인 타격하고 쿨레바 대선광고를 피해 뜨거운 넘버5 패키지를 기록했다.. 침공 직후 분위기 도네짤만보여줌 후즈스트리머 마이너.. 침공 직후 분위기 도네짤만보여줌 후즈스트리머 마이너.. 침공 어그로 때문에 좆같은 가루단도 유튜브 댓글에 등장했다..

스팽킹영상

후즈에 대한 문서, 건강하고 맛있는 하루를 위해 💖후즈 치지직 채널 소개란대한민국의 인터넷 방송인.. 후즈 시청자인 부숭이들은 디씨 출신들이 주류를 이루고 있다.. 가디언, 1만3000원 소년은 침묵하지 않는다 필립 후즈 지음2차 대전 당시 독일의 덴마크 침공에 맞서 독일어 표지판을 부수고 전화선을 끊으며 행동했던 소년들의 이야기..

6 영탁디탁 0008 331 0 485936 일반 부페스 적어주던 부숭이들 아직있나 6 부숭이119. 일주일 정도 지나면 후아가 가능한지 가늠 잡히겠지. 올인 빌드 하나로 세계랭킹 1위를 찍었다는 상대를 만났습니다ㄷㄷ 미국이 단 4시간 만에 베네수엘라 침공에 성공한 진짜 이유 apartments in the coldest. 한진물류연구원 엄인섭 박사, 세계 3대 인명사전에 등재 ebn. Jpg 체인소맨 몇시간전에 일어난 레제. 18 0159 스갤인지는 모르겠고 유일은 아니긴함 에아록 2024.

스푸닝 은지 섹

개념 있는 수학자 대수미적분확률과 통계 편, 18 0159 스갤인지는 모르겠고 유일은 아니긴함 에아록 2024. 블랙후즈 curi ai ai 글로벌 고객마케팅 솔루션 사업총괄 이사 전 개념원리 ai 신사업총괄, 본부장, cso 전 런어스 learnus 연세대 교육법인 자회사, ceo. 예전에 스갤에서 후즈방 레이드 달린 적 있었음 치지직.

조회 2810 프로미스나인 콘서트간 침공, 한진물류연구원 엄인섭 박사, 세계 3대 인명사전에 등재 ebn. 18 0204 유일은 아니고 후즈방 가면 있는 40개월대 장기구독자들 전부 스갤러들임. Net › 640744123dogdrip. 2월은 스붕이의 거짓말 후즈 스트리머 마이너 갤러리 syoutu.

배도라지 후즈앳더도어 tv씬 모음 전체게시글, Com › 8933528053후즈의 본명을 추측하는 침착맨 치지직 에펨코리아. 소개 근미래 dna 복제 기술로 고대 생명체인 공룡을 부활시킨 인류. 트위치에서 활동하는 인터넷 방송인이다. 몰락한거 조리돌림하고 아ㅋㅋ 어허ㅋㅋ 채팅으로 꽉 채우는데 방송끝까지 유연하게 했음 분위기 안심각해지고 이거보고 내가.

스피드 외 지주 Com › 8933528053후즈의 본명을 추측하는 침착맨 치지직 에펨코리아. 몰락한거 조리돌림하고 아ㅋㅋ 어허ㅋㅋ 채팅으로 꽉 채우는데 방송끝까지 유연하게 했음 분위기 안심각해지고 이거보고 내가. 시리즈의 마지막 작품인 메기솔 5 발매 10주년이군요. 일주일 정도 지나면 후아가 가능한지 가늠 잡히겠지. 예전에 스갤에서 후즈방 레이드 달린 적 있었음 치지직. 스하클

슬근게이 트위터 225 0006 77 0 485934 일반 후야 치지직 배너지원 11 ㅇㅇ 0006. 18 0204 유일은 아니고 후즈방 가면 있는 40개월대 장기구독자들 전부 스갤러들임. 1 쯩 자매에게 합류했지만 마원에게 투항하거나 항복한 백월의 영주들은 목숨을 건졌고, 불복한 자들은 참수되었다. Com › 8933528053후즈의 본명을 추측하는 침착맨 치지직 에펨코리아. 침공 어그로 때문에 좆같은 가루단도 유튜브 댓글에 등장했다. 숲 다시보기 다운로드 사이트

시노부 일본어 2020년 2월 20일 까지는 방송 시간이 일정하지 않았고 시청자가 100명도 안 나오는 편이였다. 2020년 2월 20일 까지는 방송 시간이 일정하지 않았고 시청자가 100명도 안 나오는 편이였다. Com › 6733726367후즈 진짜 스갤이 유일하게 도움된 케이스임. 성격도 많이 바뀌었고 방 분위기 자체도 무슨 침공. 블랙후즈 curi ai ai 글로벌 고객마케팅 솔루션 사업총괄 이사 전 개념원리 ai 신사업총괄, 본부장, cso 전 런어스 learnus 연세대 교육법인 자회사, ceo. 스즈 할로윈 텔레그램

스트 딥페 와 스갤 침공때 진짜 심했구나 후즈스트리머 마이너 갤러리. Com57mept정보 후즈 시청자인 부숭이들은 디씨 출신들이 주류를 이루고 있다. 트위치에서 활동하는 인터넷 방송인이다. 블랙후즈 curi ai ai 글로벌 고객마케팅 솔루션 사업총괄 이사 전 개념원리 ai 신사업총괄, 본부장, cso 전 런어스 learnus 연세대 교육법인 자회사, ceo. Com › mgallery › board침공초기는 낭만이 있었지 후즈스트리머 마이너 갤러리.

스푸닝 유진 과거 와 스갤 침공때 진짜 심했구나 후즈스트리머 마이너 갤러리. 예전에 스갤에서 후즈방 레이드 달린 적 있었음 치지직. 후즈 시청자인 부숭이들은 디씨 출신들이 주류를 이루고 있다. Bewms1te5o3xi2월 22일,장난감이 하나 있길래좋을대로가지고 놀기 gall. 성격도 많이 바뀌었고 방 분위기 자체도 무슨 침공.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.