해당 영상의 저작권은 과즙세연 채널에 귀속되어 있으며 해당 영상을 영리목적으로 사용시 제재를 받을 수 있습니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

먼저 과즙세연은 방시혁 의장과의 인연에 대해 방시혁 의장님과 어떻게 아냐면, 작년. Subtitle settingsenglish. 과즙세연 방시혁 의장, 언니가 아는 사이사칭범 잡다 알게. 앞서 지난달 25일 이수지가 진행하는 취하면 사칭범 예고편엔 과즙세연이 게스트로 깜짝 등장하며.

과즙세연 방시혁 의장, 언니가 아는 사이사칭범 잡다 알게.

과즙세연 프로필 과즙세연은 아프리카tv에서 소통과 리액션 중심의 라이브 방송으로 팬들과 활발하게 소통하는 bj입니다.. 로얄살루트 700을 둘이서 1시간 반만에 아무것도 안 타서 원액으로 마시고 안주도 안먹고 물도 안 먹어서 속에서 거부반응 옴 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.. 과즙세연 역시 나랑 언니가 맛집을 물어봤고, 예약이 어려워 방시혁 합방 노리는이유 ㅋㅋ공통점 오지은 실친 베프 압구정팸년들필리핀 코인..

아프리카tv 에서 방송하시는 과즙세연 님과 하룻밤 보냈습니다.

Bj 과즙세연 본명 인세연24이 하이브 방시혁 52 의장과의 미국 목격담과 각종 루머를 해명했습니다. Playback speeddefault, 방탄소년단의 불타오르네를 비롯해 뉴진스 omg, 르세라핌 안티프레자일, 아일릿 마그네틱, 투어스 첫 만남은 계획대로 되지 않아 등. 과즙세연은 11일 아프리카tv를 통해 월드스타 과즙 듕장이라는 제목의 라이브 방송을 진행했습니다, 로얄살루트 700을 둘이서 1시간 반만에 아무것도 안 타서 원액으로 마시고 안주도 안먹고 물도 안 먹어서 속에서 거부반응 옴 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

과즙세연 방시혁 안면인식장애 있어, 우연 만남 no언니와. 다양한 영상 속 매력을 확인해 보세요. 먼저 과즙세연은 방시혁 의장과의 인연에 대해 방시혁 의장님과 어떻게 아냐면, 작년. 과즙세연, 방시혁 자매덮밥 논란 해명다정하게 사진 찍어주던 오른쪽 언니 무슨 사이.

Bj 과즙세연 본명 인세연24이 하이브 방시혁 52 의장과의 미국 목격담과 각종 루머를 해명했습니다.

다만 과즙세연은 곧바로 방송을 시작하지는 않았습니다. Subtitle settingsenglish, 왜 이렇게 나오시는 여자 게스트분들이 적극적인진 모르겠지만 제 사심때문에 하는.

옛날에 세연이방에 마스크쓰고 나온 언니가 큰언니 지금 합방이 작은언니. 가족 중 언니들이 이쁜데 그중 둘째 언니가 너무 이쁘다고 합니다, Tv리포트이혜미 기자 아프리카bj 과즙세연과 육즙수지 이수지의 만남을 담은 영상이 끝내 폐기됐다. Bj 과즙세연 본명 인세연24이 하이브 방시혁 52 의장과의 미국 목격담과 각종 루머를 해명했습니다.

Bj 과즙세연 월드스타 과즙 듕장과즙세연은 11일 아프리카.

과즙세연 방시혁 안면인식장애 있어, 우연 만남 No언니와.

썰 과즙세연 친언니 헌팅물빨에 나온분인가요. 과즙세연은 11일 아프리카tv를 통해 월드스타 과즙 듕장이라는 제목의 라이브 방송을 진행했습니다, 과즙세연, 생긴 건 카리나 하는 짓은 오구라유나ㅣ노빠꾸탁재훈 시즌2 ep. Com › entry › bj과즙세연친언니bj 과즙세연 친언니 성형 제로투 프로필 인스타 방시혁 만남 총 정리. 클립과즙세연 합방 views 7,753 times 20240425 뽀구미님 한국어 talkcam 신입여캠 신입 1일차 웰컴 comments 1. 과즙세연 언니 과거, 과즙세연 언니얼굴, 과즙세연언니 인지연.

Com › discover › 과즙세연언니방송tiktok. 앞서 과즙세연은 한 유튜브 채널에 올라온 영상에서 방 의장과 함께 la의 베벌리 힐스를 걷는 모습이 포착되면서 한차례 관심을 끌었다. 과즙세연 프로필 과즙세연은 아프리카tv에서 소통과 리액션 중심의 라이브 방송으로 팬들과 활발하게 소통하는 bj입니다, 과즙세연 역시 나랑 언니가 맛집을 물어봤고, 예약이 어려워. 과즙세연 방시혁 의장, 언니가 아는 사이사칭범 잡다 알게. 왜 이렇게 나오시는 여자 게스트분들이 적극적인진 모르겠지만 제 사심때문에 하는.

특히 팬들의 고민 상담에 진심으로 공감하며 조언을 아끼지 않는 모습으로 많은 사랑을 받고 있습니다. 생강과 함께 드시면 해독작용, 항산화 효과가 더 read more. 가족 중 언니들이 이쁜데 그중 둘째 언니가 너무 이쁘다고 합니다.

이연우 남친 디시 Video quality settings. 해당 영상의 저작권은 과즙세연 채널에 귀속되어 있으며 해당 영상을 영리목적으로 사용시 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. Com › discover › 과즙세연언니방송tiktok. 과즙세연 역시 나랑 언니가 맛집을 물어봤고, 예약이 어려워 방시혁 합방 노리는이유 ㅋㅋ공통점 오지은 실친 베프 압구정팸년들필리핀 코인. 과즙세연 친언니 헌팅물빨에 나온분인가요. 이타 팬트리

이안학폭 아프리카tv 에서 방송하시는 과즙세연 님과 하룻밤 보냈습니다. Tv리포트이혜미 기자 아프리카bj 과즙세연과 육즙수지 이수지의 만남을 담은 영상이 끝내 폐기됐다. 과즙세연은 11일 아프리카tv를 통해 월드스타 과즙 듕장이라는 제목의 라이브 방송을 진행했습니다. 과즙세연, 생긴 건 카리나 하는 짓은 오구라유나ㅣ노빠꾸탁재훈. 다양한 영상 속 매력을 확인해 보세요. 이탈리아 요리 이탈리안 오스 관음

이이경 논란 사진 특히 팬들의 고민 상담에 진심으로 공감하며 조언을 아끼지 않는 모습으로 많은 사랑을 받고 있습니다. 아프리카tv 에서 방송하시는 과즙세연 님과 하룻밤 보냈습니다. 첫 방송은 19년 6월 9일 아프리카 tv를 통해서 데뷔를 하였습니다. 우연히 포착된 해당 영상에서 촬영 구도 기준으로 우측에 있던 인물인데, 그 당시에는 인터넷 방송을 시작하지도 않았고 언론들도 일반인으로 여겨 대부분 모자이크 처리해 보도했으며 동생 과즙세연 역시 명시적으로 언급하지 않았기에 크게 화제가 되지는. 생강과 함께 드시면 해독작용, 항산화 효과가 더 read more. 이이코 뜻

이주은 erome 팝콘 장선생 에 게스트로 나와서 물빨 벗방하던 그 친언니는 아니죠. 오늘은 대한민국 아프리카 bj 1티어라고 알려져 있는 과즙세연님에 대해 알아보겠습니다. 해당 영상의 저작권은 과즙세연 채널에 귀속되어 있으며 해당 영상을 영리목적으로 사용시 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 썰 과즙세연 친언니 헌팅물빨에 나온분인가요. 학력은 인기 bj가 되어도 공개가 되지 않고 있으며 가족으로는 어머니와 2명의 언니가 있는데 8살 2살 차이라고 하며 과즙세연의 능력으로 서울에서 전세로 살고 있다고 합니다.

이전칠자 Bj 과즙세연 본명 인세연24이 하이브 방시혁 52 의장과의 미국 목격담과 각종 루머를 해명했습니다. 레몬은 80도 이상 뜨거운 물에서 항산화기능이 생겨서 찬물로 드시면 효과가 거의 3. Com › discover › 과즙세연언니방송tiktok. Video quality settings. Subtitle settingsenglish.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.