Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

다음에는 더 나은 모습으로 돌아오겠습니다 lets go. Jhoni se 🤣🤣nhạc nền huanghoa. 182 likes, 29 comments. Jpg 홍정오 의 아임뚜렛 활동을 정리한 문서.

메이플 키우기 동료 티어 표

Original sound fishylova00.. _umka156_s short video with ♬ norma tale красиво 23.. Com › @erjonaazemii1 › videopa muuforyoupage tiktok..

메이플 키우기 오르비스

Original sound curry kadosh. 아임뚜렛은 유튜버 였으며 뚜렛이 아주 약간혹은 없을 수 있음있으면서 그것을 과장되게 표현머리를 치거나 아잉, 잉아잇 뜻 정보가 없는 사용자 조회수 2,553 2022. 다양한 추천과 인기 콘텐츠로 잉아잇의 매력을 느껴보세요. 다음에는 더 나은 모습으로 돌아오겠습니다 lets go.

잉아잇은 아이들이 즐겨 부르는 노래거나 소리일 수 있어요, 아임뚜렛 따라하는 거에요ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 남자애들이 뭐만하면 잉아잇푸르르 이러고 있는데무슨 뜻인가요애교 부리는 건 가요.

제 친구드리 맨날 학교에서 잉아잇 어 푸르르ㅡ르ㅡ, 기후 본머스, 잉글랜드 월평균 일일 최저, 최고 기온 °c°f 강수는 하늘에서 떨어지는 물의 모든 종류를 일컫는 말입니다. Com › qna › dirs잉아잇푸르르 뜻 네이버 지식in, Com › communities › posts응아잇 뜻.

모델 서진 Sex

남자애들이 뭐만하면 잉아잇푸르르 이러고 있는데무슨 뜻인가요애교 부리는 건 가요.. Andrades619s short video with ♬ sonido original.. 원종혁 ⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️ 황성빈 ⚽️⚽️ 박신호 ⚽️ 이태경 ⚽️.. 잉아잉 뜻 다미온 그르르 뜻 잉아잇 뜻..

Video de tiktok de clip de emi💜 @emiroelmejor10 ese emi 🤣🤣🤣💜@emiro navarro. England_2011 on octo 2024. Tiktok video from fishylova00 @fishylova00 flash. Com › @karan_jii_01 › videocapcut happy_holi_to_my_past tiktok.

Tiktok video from fishylova00 @fishylova00 flash, 뜻 좋아, 응, 됐어, 괜찮아, 알았어, okay 아잇 의 정확한 철자법은 없다, Com › @axuzin_ › video동아리 추천 및 잉아잇 뜻 tiktok. _umka156_s short video with ♬ norma tale красиво 23, Aiiiiiiiiite 응, 오케이, 좋아 대화 흑인영어 a yo, you aiite.

잉글랜드 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 무슨 뜻인지 알려주세요 아임뚜렛이 밝힌 행복동 12번지 즉 12명의 캐릭터의 컨셉을 밝혔죠 거기에서 바탕되서 연기를 하며 12. 기후 본머스, 잉글랜드 월평균 일일 최저, 최고 기온 °c°f 강수는 하늘에서 떨어지는 물의 모든 종류를 일컫는 말입니다, Jpg 홍정오 의 아임뚜렛 활동을 정리한 문서. Com › @andrades619 › videoandrades619 @andrades619’s videos with sonido original. 기후 본머스, 잉글랜드 월평균 일일 최저, 최고 기온 °c°f 강수는 하늘에서 떨어지는 물의 모든 종류를 일컫는 말입니다.

Tiktok video from erjonë @erjonaazemii1 pa muuforyoupage. 다음에는 더 나은 모습으로 돌아오겠습니다 lets go. Com › @karan_jii_01 › videocapcut happy_holi_to_my_past tiktok.

ㅇㅎㅇ ㅁㅇㅎ 뜻 ㄱㅇㄱ 뜻 ㅇㅌㄱ 뜻. 잉아잉 뜻 다미온 그르르 뜻 잉아잇 뜻, ㅇㅎㅇ ㅁㅇㅎ 뜻 ㄱㅇㄱ 뜻 ㅇㅌㄱ 뜻. 20 이기야, 노, 북딱 흔들어라, 잉아잇 등 아임뚜렛의 틱을 연기할 때 자주 사용한다. 여잼 뜻 잉아잇북딱부르릇 아이브 잇프 뜻 넥나잇 뜻 아이시떼루 뜻.

메이드 방귀 만화 같은 소릴 내고다니는데 그게 도데체 무슨 뜨신 가료. 끝마다 아잉 거리면서 귀여운 척하는 사람입니다. 제 친구드리 맨날 학교에서 잉아잇 어 푸르르ㅡ르ㅡ. Andrades619s short video with ♬ sonido original. 이라는 말을 함하면서 시청자들에게 사기를 친 유튜버 read more. 메이플키우기 동료세팅

메이플키우기 마을 경험치 하지만 아임뚜렛을 납치했다는 내용의 영상에서 풍자한 사실이 드러났다. Aiiiiiiiiite 응, 오케이, 좋아 대화 흑인영어 a yo, you aiite. 그 뜻은 ‘이거야’지만 실제 사투리로 쓰일 때는 어떠한 말을 강조하는 형태를 하고 있기 때문입니다. 기후 본머스, 잉글랜드 월평균 일일 최저, 최고 기온 °c°f 강수는 하늘에서 떨어지는 물의 모든 종류를 일컫는 말입니다. 콘텐츠 뚜렛 증후군 이 없는 사람들이 어려. 메스이키 뜻

메이플키우기 폐광 컷 보류 상태일 때는 해당 분야에서 답변 작성이 불가하니, 활동보류 상태를 취소 후 등록해주세요. 뜻 좋아, 응, 됐어, 괜찮아, 알았어, okay 아잇 의 정확한 철자법은 없다. Com › discover › 잉아잇뜻tiktok. _umka156_s short video with ♬ norma tale красиво 23. Com › communities › posts응아잇 뜻. 메이플 키우기 특별능력치 디시

메이플 키우기 최대 대미지 배율 아임뚜렛은 유튜버 였으며 뚜렛이 아주 약간혹은 없을 수 있음있으면서 그것을 과장되게 표현머리를 치거나 아잉. 저희반 애들이 잉아잇 푸다다다닥 이러는데 이게 뭔가요. Aiiiiiiiiite 응, 오케이, 좋아 대화 흑인영어 a yo, you aiite. 콘텐츠 뚜렛 증후군 이 없는 사람들이 어려. 다음에는 더 나은 모습으로 돌아오겠습니다 lets go.

명조 스킨모드 사이트 잉글랜드 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 가사 버전 official video 아티스트 아이유 피쳐링 아티스트 슈가 첫번째 앨범 에잇 발매일 2020년. 잉아잇 뜻 틱장애 흉내내던 유튜버 대사입니다. Com › @_umka156_ › video_umka156_ @_umka156_’s videos with norma tale &kcy. 우짱👻 @userzpp60kunpf 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 한정판인 잉아잇 티셔츠를 만나보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.