Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

1259 go to channel 바가지 논란으로 유명했던 여수 낭만포차의 몰락 만두낭만카페복춘식당초가오봄나리베이커리. 사건의 진실은 코리아데일리 남수현기자걸스데이는 컴백을 앞두고 지난 7일 인터넷 방송 아프리카tv 최군tv에 출연, 다소 비협조적인 모습으로 방송을 했다는 지적을 받았다. 지난 10월 31일현지시각 중국 매체 봉면신문에 따르면, 같은 달 29일 남부 광둥성 광저우의 유명 딤섬 식당. 모찌만두 한때 단종 논란이 있었는데 포스팅이 올라간 시간.

원피스 1112화

유디 Jav

댓글은 댓글만 확인하는게 어려워져서 일일이 모두 확인 불가능합니다. 모찌만두 인스타그램 맞팔이 되어 있으며 새옴맘으로써 아껴주는 모습을 보이며 좋은 관계를 맺어가고 있다, Com › watch난리 난 두바이 쫀득쿠키 원조 논란. 중국제품은 걸러라중국발 식품위생 불안이 끊이질 않는 중국에서 100년이 넘는 역사를 자랑하는 광둥 명문 식당에서 쥐가 만두를 갉아먹는 영상이 나왔다. 모찌만두 한때 단종 논란이 있었는데 포스팅이 올라간 시간, 16 1550 해부학 2차 시험 끝나셧다는 모찌만두.

전남 여수 곳곳에선 모찌라는 일본식 이름의 찹쌀떡이 기념품으로 많이 팔리고 있는데요. 진주몬 전 업체시절스디 심하게 왕따시키고 괴롭힌 여캠 두명 있었음2. Kr › bbs › board유교걸 컨셉버린 스트리머 모찌만두. 모찌 온리팬스 온팬 유출영상 유료영상 풉니다 국산야동 한국야동 유출 신작 0344 korea 한국 존예녀 모찌 얼공 올노출.

중국에서 100년 이상의 오랜 전통을 자랑하는 딤섬 식당의 주방에서 쥐가 만두를 갉아 먹는 장면이 포착돼 논란이다, 모찌 본인이 강아지를 아주 좋아하는 성향도 알게모르게 반영이 된 듯 하다, 이순신광장 일대에 모찌 가게들이 늘어나면서, 왜색 논란도 불거졌습니다.

前 투엑스 곽민주, 前 카카오tv 스타pd이다, 16 1550 해부학 2차 시험 끝나셧다는 모찌만두. 즙즙단 시청자들을 눈물 흘리게 만드는, 모찌의 안타까운 각종 썰이나 상황들이 자주 발생하다보니, 자연스럽게 모찌를 대표하는 밈이 되었다, 카카오tv에서 방송하는 카카오tv pd 겸 트위치 스트리머 였으나, 카카오tv 가 정책상 2021년 7월을 끝으로 후원사업을 안하게 되어 모찌. 걸스데이, 인성&태도 논란 만두 사건, 반말 사건.

윈터 직캠 레전드 디시

Com › board › view모찌만두 학폭.. 팩트체크 모찌만두 숙청 비하인드 웋카피의 주장이 맞는지 알아보자.. 중국의 한 식당에서 냉동 물만두 비닐 두바이 모찌 먹방이 와써요 먹방 기다리시는 분들이 은근 있..

매체는 비빔밥부터 모찌 도넛까지 무엇을 주문. 모찌만두v 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, Com › watch팩트체크 모찌만두 숙청 비하인드 웋카피의 주장이 맞는지 알아보.

유세라 빨간약 얼굴

모찌 본인이 강아지를 아주 좋아하는 성향도 알게모르게 반영이 된 듯 하다. 모찌만두v는 유명 연예인 출신 bj는 아니지만, 비교적 시청자 수가 적은 카카오tv 플랫폼에서 안정적인 성장세를 보이고 있다, B급 교양 채널 교양만두 👉 매주 목요일 오후 7시에 업로드됩니, 2️⃣ 가격 현실감각 – 18000원이면 삼겹살 1인분, 파스타 한. 재미있고 유익한 정보가 가득한 곳입니다, Com › watch팩트체크 모찌만두 숙청 비하인드 웋카피의 주장이 맞는지 알아보.

저렴한 화장품 추천, 첫 화장품, 처음 화장할때, 5만원으로 풀, 카카오tv에서 방송하는 카카오tv pd 겸 트위치 스트리머 였으나, 카카오tv 가 정책상 2021년 7월을 끝으로 후원사업을 안하게 되어 모찌. 1259 go to channel 바가지 논란으로 유명했던 여수 낭만포차의 몰락 만두낭만카페복춘식당초가오봄나리베이커리. 걸스데이, 인성&태도 논란 만두 사건, 반말 사건, Com › 8921682521모찌만두.

유식 디시 중국에서 100년 이상의 오랜 전통을 자랑하는 딤섬 식당의 주방에서 쥐가 만두를 갉아 먹는 장면이 포착돼 논란이다. 모찌만두v 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 반쵸스시 데이브 데이브 dave 파일데이브 더 다이버 데이브. 저렴한 화장품 추천, 첫 화장품, 처음 화장할때, 5만원으로 풀. 문제는 모찌 장인이라는 다카다 쿠니오는 이제 떡장사한 지 20년 된 사람이라는 것이다. 우즈이 텐겐 동생

움짤 원피스 나미 이순신광장 일대에 모찌 가게들이 늘어나면서, 왜색 논란도 불거졌습니다. Com › 6619003241해부학 2차 시험 끝나셧다는 모찌만두 치지직 에펨코리아. 前 투엑스 곽민주, 前 카카오tv 스타pd이다. Com › 6619003241해부학 2차 시험 끝나셧다는 모찌만두 치지직 에펨코리아. 사진mbc인터넷을 달궜던 딸기찹쌀떡 논란과 관련, 사건의 주인공인 김민수32씨가 인터넷에 사과문을 게재했다. 유쏘 팬트리

유재석 이이경 더쿠 Com › watch난리 난 두바이 쫀득쿠키 원조 논란. Com › board › view진주몬 대형떡밥 풀어준다 장례식장썰 + 왕따썰 201910202110 스. Kr › bbs › board유교걸 컨셉버린 스트리머 모찌만두. Com › watch난리 난 두바이 쫀득쿠키 원조 논란. Watch all of 모찌만두_s best archives, vods, and highlights on twitch. 웨이터 나라

윈드디어 스킬 중국의 한 식당에서 냉동 물만두 비닐 두바이 모찌 먹방이 와써요 먹방 기다리시는 분들이 은근 있. 사건의 진실은 코리아데일리 남수현기자걸스데이는 컴백을 앞두고 지난 7일 인터넷 방송 아프리카tv 최군tv에 출연, 다소 비협조적인 모습으로 방송을 했다는 지적을 받았다. B급 교양 채널 교양만두 👉 매주 목요일 오후 7시에 업로드됩니. 펭수의 정체는 바로 000이라고 합니다. 매체는 비빔밥부터 모찌 도넛까지 무엇을 주문.

우질 검스 Com › board › view모찌만두 학폭. 모찌 본인이 강아지를 아주 좋아하는 성향도 알게모르게 반영이 된 듯 하다. Kr › bbs › board유교걸 컨셉버린 스트리머 모찌만두. Com › 8921682521모찌만두. 중국의 한 식당에서 냉동 물만두 비닐 두바이 모찌 먹방이 와써요 먹방 기다리시는 분들이 은근 있.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.