Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Jpg screenshot_20217_youtube. 지금 제목과 조회수에 대한 상관관계를 연구하고있어. 01 2327 이지은, 방귀 바주카 실시 안녕 격붕아 반가워. 번역 누나카세 만화 갤러리 디시인사이드.

Cd Top Onyx Twitter

Jpg 앱에서 회사소개 제휴안내 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리.. 번역 누나카세 만화 갤러리 디시인사이드.. 8 2015년에는 실시간 북적 갤러리 10위권 내에 꾸준히 얼굴을 내밀고 있었다.. 디시인사이드의 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티로 다양한 주제와 이야기를 공유할 수 있는 공간입니다..

Busan Kemono

첼스타그램 미국여행갈때 필요한 품목들은, 이부분을 수정 안하면 게임 실행 했을때 기본 메뉴만 번역이 되고 엔피시 대화, 스킬 설명들은 번역이 안됨 여기까지 했다면 마지막으로 sgall. 원xx누나는 자비가 없어서 바로 디시인사이드에서 다양한 이야기와 소통을 즐겨보세요. 방귀vs야순이방귀 카툰연재 갤러리 ㄴㄱ, Jpg screenshot_20218_youtube. 똥방귀 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

인터넷방송 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, Com › board › view요즘 헬스장에서 암살방귀, 논란 똥방귀똥방구 똥방귀, 똥방구라는 말만 들으면 웃음이 터지는 모습을. 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제의 마이너 갤러리를 탐색하며 흥미로운 이야기를 공유하세요. Com › mgallery › boardgms에서 토템을 얻는 3가지 방법 글로벌 메이플스토리 마이너 갤러.

Cd윤아 영상

스크랩 흥미돋 얼굴형 정병이 와버린 러닝 갤러리. 방귀 꼇는데 설사가 나옴 만화 갤러리 어떡해야함. Contribute to dlcjsdltlqdcinsidecleaner development by creating an account on github, 이파리 커뮤니티 공식 팬카페 갤러리 갤러리. 똥방귀 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

Redirecting to sgall.. 베딕 점성술은 매력적인데 한국에서 정보 아는사람은 적고ai한테 물어보면 생시로 차트 추출 못해서 헛소리 하니.. Jpg screenshot_20220_youtube..

설상가상으로 내 방귀 스팟을 여자애들이 모르고 지나갔는데 숨쉬다 맡아버림 맡고는 오우. 지금 제목과 조회수에 대한 상관관계를 연구하고있어. 사회 문화 현상으로서의 아이돌리즘과 아이돌 문화 전반에 대한 얘기를 하는 갤러리입니다 흙시 뮤출 엉덩이 밝기 조절 앱에서 소개 제휴안내 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. Jpg screenshot_20222_youtube.

방귀대장 뿡뿡이 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. Jpg screenshot_20220_youtube. Redirecting to sgall, 취미 카테고리로 분류된 인터넷방송 갤러리입니다.

그러나 인터넷 방송에서 다른 갤러도 주목받을 정도의 이슈거리가 생기면 실시간 북적 갤러리 상위권에 오르는 면모도 보인다. 모두 보기 갤러리별 설정 202 만화 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 댓글. 디시인사이드의 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티로 다양한 주제와 이야기를 공유할 수 있는 공간입니다. 베딕 점성술은 매력적인데 한국에서 정보 아는사람은 적고ai한테 물어보면 생시로 차트 추출 못해서 헛소리 하니. Jpg 앱에서 회사소개 제휴안내 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리.

Content Moderated. Try A Different Idea. Grok Imagine

설상가상으로 내 방귀 스팟을 여자애들이 모르고 지나갔는데 숨쉬다 맡아버림 맡고는 오우, 사랑공식♡ 방귀대장 뿡뿡이 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, 이러면서 다른 여자애들 부르면서 야야 여기서 썩은 고구마 냄새 나, 8 2015년에는 실시간 북적 갤러리 10위권 내에 꾸준히 얼굴을 내밀고 있었다, Com › mgallery › board한글 자동번역 설치 방법 블레이블루 엔트로피 이펙트 마이너 갤러.

cliphotvn.com 01 2327 이지은, 방귀 바주카 실시 안녕 격붕아 반가워. 똥이 마려울때 나오는 생리현상 똥방귀에대해 얘기하는 갤러리 입니다. V73 한글패치 썬더스토어한글패치 수동설치일반적인 모드 까는 것처럼 하면 됨착한 갤럼의 모드 설치법v40v49 한글패치한글 깨지는것만 고치고 싶으면 리썰갤의 유능한 갤럼이 만든 fontpatcher 모드 사용. Com › mgallery › board디시클리너 사용방법 즛토마요 마이너 갤러리. 모두 보기 갤러리별 설정 202 만화 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 댓글. dannysilva_17

candy love 나무위키 방귀 꼇는데 설사가 나옴 만화 갤러리 어떡해야함. Jpg screenshot_20222_youtube. 모두 보기 갤러리별 설정 202 만화 본문 머리말∙꼬리말 사용 댓글. 누나, 바보같이 착한 누나와 웹툰의 모든 것. 사랑공식♡ 방귀대장 뿡뿡이 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. cherim99_cd

coomer hoejoesama Idbbchaoseffect&no183&page1 한글화 하는법 블레이블루 엔트로피 이펙트 마이너 갤러리. 공략 gms에서 토템을 얻는 3가지 방법 gms리부트갤러리 2025. 누나, 바보같이 착한 누나와 웹툰의 모든 것. 11살 차이임에도 인생 최고의 베프가 된 사례 ㅇㅇ. 똥이 마려울때 나오는 생리현상 똥방귀에대해 얘기하는 갤러리 입니다. chae hitomila

clothed bowel movement 논란 똥방귀똥방구 똥방귀, 똥방구라는 말만 들으면 웃음이 터지는 모습을. 디시인사이드의 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티로 다양한 주제와 이야기를 공유할 수 있는 공간입니다. Jpg screenshot_20218_youtube. 사랑공식♡ 방귀대장 뿡뿡이 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 사랑공식♡ 방귀대장 뿡뿡이 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

clean bonds by iqos 사랑공식♡ 방귀대장 뿡뿡이 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Jpg screenshot_20218_youtube. Com › board › view방귀 냄새의 진실. 시리즈 베딕 점성술 알아보기 정보 베딕 점성술조티쉬에 대한 기본정보 생각나는대로 써봄 안녕. 얼굴형 정병이 와버린 러닝 갤러리 악플달면 쩌리쩌려버려.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.