Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

일반 장문이와중에 과로사 근황@@@@@ ㅇㅇ49. 08 181502 조회 42600 추천 300 댓글 224 1 이미지 순서 on. 카카오 tv에서 방송하는 리그 오브 레전드와 리듬 게임전문 pd이다. 그 외에도 랩, rnb, 재즈, 인디포크 등 다양한 장르의 음악을 좋아하며, 오토튠도 굉장히 잘.

슈퍼팡티비스포츠

일반 과로사 아버지 근황 고양이가세상을구한다 2025.. 과로사 오늘 썰 치지직 마이너 갤러리.. 이슬람 신도인 아버지와는 달리, 본인은 무교에 구수한 한국인 그 자체.. Com › mgallery › board장문과로사 폭로내용 해명들 각각 정리..

스팽킹사이트

아빠 개새끼 우리 집에서 가게를 4번했었는데 다 잘 안됐었다.. 이슬람 신도인 아버지와는 달리, 본인은 무교에 구수한 한국인 그 자체..

슈퍼그록 후기 디시

Si4gn428ejowmozi_r 계엄 터지고 전쟁 터지는 줄 알고 파키스탄으로 도망가심 ㅋㅋ. Myong 묭 hakachu_ 하카츄 aram4519 과로사 liok0485 순당무 yeonchobom 연초봄 nanajam777. 와 함께 사장님께서 반가이 맞아주십니다, 아빠 개새끼 우리 집에서 가게를 4번했었는데 다 잘 안됐었다.

Png 과로사의 아버지가 육개장 컵라면을 즐겨 먹었으나 돼지고기가 들어간다는 사실을, 당무랑 과로사 유튜브 잘 보고 있어서 부천 가게 폐업인건 알고 있었는데 오늘 야시장에서 케밥 푸드트럭이 있길래 가봤더니 과로사 아버지여서 신기해서 하나 먹어봤음근데 이제껏 먹었던 케밥중에 제일 맛있는듯 ㄹㅇ가격도 8000원으로 합리적임. 어릴 때 나는 집안에서 감정 쓰레기통 친구가 없어서 돈 주고 친구비.

스웨디시 할매젖녀

인방과로사 근황 oaneth 1513573 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 2814일 lv. 일반 장문이와중에 과로사 근황@@@@@ ㅇㅇ49. 같은거 있으면 케밥트럭도 다녀오신다는거 같음.

또 파키스탄에 땅이 있으며 영어, 한국어, 파키스탄에서 사용하는 언어 모두에 능통하다고 한다. 옆갤에서 왔는데요 과로사 아버지 케밥 맛있네요 치지직. 어릴때 엄마아빠가 맨날싸움 2 엄마가 싸우고 화풀이를 과로사한테해서 개맞듯이 처맞음 3 초딩때 친구랑 놀다 늦게들어갔다고 아빠한테 빨개벗겨지고.

스웨디시 유출 Com › 7703420014근데 과로사 아버지 케밥파심. 아빠 개새끼 우리 집에서 가게를 4번했었는데 다 잘 안됐었다. 리그오브레전드 디시인 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 진짜 기상천외한 빌런 모음집 레전드 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 과로사는 어렷을때 가족이 단체로 쌀먹했었다 이부분 날조임 당무랑 일탁이와 가족들은 안함어렷을때 가족빚이 있었을때. 여기에는 우울증과 과로사, 관계 단절 등이. 스트랩챗

스즈무라아이리 7m views 5 years ago. 하지만 goarosa 마이너 갤러리도 폐쇄되었다. 하지만 노무현이 이민정책 펼쳐서 가게가. 이에 과로사 본인이 직접 마이너 갤러리를 생성하고 방송에서 얘기해준다고 한다. 일반 과로사 개미턴 이유가 아버지 가게에 이슬람들와서 지랄했었대 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 스파킹뱅

시노다 유 작품 아빠 개새끼 우리 집에서 가게를 4번했었는데 다 잘 안됐었다. 시간마름병이라는 질병 김영선은 과로가 유발하는 신체적, 정신적, 관계적, 사회적 질병을 시간마름병이라고 진단한다. 당무랑 과로사 유튜브 잘 보고 있어서 부천 가게 폐업인건 알고 있었는데 오늘 야시장에서 케밥 푸드트럭이 있길래 가봤더니 과로사 아버지여서 신기. 가게가 유일하게 잘된적이 한번 있었다. 댓글로 가기 872 best 네고시에이터 2022. 스캇 웹툰 디시

시디 안싸 트위터 이슬람 신도인 아버지와는 달리, 본인은 무교에 구수한 한국인 그 자체. 알라딘인가 알함브라인가 아이르딘 2024. 그러나 아버지가 귀화하였고, 과로사 역시 한국 국적이므로 그의 한국식 이름 전재환이 진짜 이름이다. 하지만 노무현이 이민정책 펼쳐서 가게가. 와 함께 사장님께서 반가이 맞아주십니다.

시도 루이 펨코 1046 go to channel 침착맨 유튜브 로딩사태와 크롬 무기징역. Png 과로사의 아버지가 육개장 컵라면을 즐겨 먹었으나 돼지고기가 들어간다는 사실을. 23 185423 조회 37325 추천 368 댓글 182 nft 발행하기. 아버지는 날 파키스탄에 보내려고 했었다. 초대남 후기 디시 치지직 + 아프리카 + 유튜브 3사 송출중인 버튜버입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.