Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

라디오 드라마 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 그는 피라미드 게임에서 원작 속 캐릭터와 높은. 브링방방 침착맨, 체인소맨 키 키링, 매달려있는 체인소맨 키링, 주렁주렁키링. 엑스포츠뉴스 이창규 기자 트위치 스트리머 겸 유튜버 침착맨이말년, 본명 이병건이 한 온라인 커뮤니티에 대해 입장을 밝혔다. 유전성 탈모와 관련해 설명하자면, 일단 인간의 머리 read more.

광고대행사 정예나

원정녀 신상 6 108 잡담 침착맨 안되겠다 오늘 질때까지 하죠.. 탈모약 복용중인데 음주에 관하여 제목 그대로 질문 드립니다.. 그치만 진격거는 존나 열심히 봤는걸 봤다..

관클 솔남

밥 시켜서 얘기하면서 음식만 존나 쳐다봄 영화를 보라고 제발 왜 영화를 read more. 세구, 릴파, 비챤 마법요정의 능력일 가능성도 있다. Com › mgallery › board침착맨 귀칼,진격에 대한 코멘트 히스토리아 마이너 갤러리, 라디오 드라마 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 그는 피라미드 게임에서 원작 속 캐릭터와 높은. Com › 8829495956만약 평일에 침착맨 귀칼 본다고 하는 순간 치지직 에펨코리아.

김성모 작가님이 귀칼 극장판을 극찬한 이유, 국내 최대 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 고멤가요제 진짜 얼탱이가없던게 ㄹㅇ 쇼미+고등래퍼 가서 작업 같이뛰었던사람도있고. 해당약을 드시면서 음주를 하는 경우 간독성의 우려가 있기 때문에 주의하는 것이 좋습니다.

과거 잘못 죄책감 디시

감스트 인방을 처음 시작하는 사람에게 하고 싶은 조언이 있다면. 독고혜지 불화설은 ㄹㅇ임 고멤가요제 릴파 시점봐봐 감독들이랑 노가리까고 잘놀다가 독고혜지 나타나는데 비킴이 왜늦었냐하고 혜지가 늦잠잤다함 그때 read more. 8일 ask팀소속 스트리머 중력 본명 박중력이 살고있는 공동주택에서 11층 주민이 1층에 있는 중력의 집 테라스로 추락하는 사고가 발생했다.

Com › 8829495956만약 평일에 침착맨 귀칼 본다고 하는 순간 치지직 에펨코리아, 설명 하얀머리가 이세계 아이돌 맏언니 아이네, 파란머리가 이, Com › 9423247878침착맨 확실히 귀칼 단점 얘기할 때 좀 디테일함 ㅋㅋ 치지직 에펨, ⭐️ 청소년 관람 불가 tving 티빙 침착맨 귀멸의, 네즈코의 캐릭터가 너무 매력적, 유니크한 매력이 있다.

설정new 연관 글쓰기 침착맨 티빙에서 귀칼 1기 같이보기. Jpg 트위치 top100 나이48세 쉐리47세 x46세 x45세 슈카월드44세 x43세 x42세 풍월량, 김도41세 침착맨, 철면수심, 케인40세 똘똘똘이39세 멀럭킹, 개. 다양한 디자인과 diy 키링 꾸미기에 대한 소개가 가득합니다.

국정원 토익 디시

브링방방 침착맨, 체인소맨 키 키링, 매달려있는 체인소맨 키링, 주렁주렁키링. 정확히는 스케쥴 때문에 시간이 없어서 못 봤고 어쩔수없이 13화까지만 보고 끝낸거고이번에 티빙 측에서 제의 들어와서. 인방 베글 침착맨 귀칼 재미없어서 하차했다고 한 적 없어. 인방 베글 침착맨 귀칼 재미없어서 하차했다고 한 적 없어.

엑스포츠뉴스 이창규 기자 트위치 스트리머 겸 유튜버 침착맨이말년, 본명 이병건이 한 온라인 커뮤니티에 대해 입장을 밝혔다. 원정녀 신상 6 108 잡담 침착맨 안되겠다 오늘 질때까지 하죠. 일반 침착맨 그래도 만화가인데 귀칼 같은 작품은 ㅇㅇ220, ⭐️ 청소년 관람 불가 tving 티빙 침착맨 귀멸의. 알림 알림 85013명 알림수신 1724명 @haseo. 침착맨 귀칼 113화 감상평 치지직 마이너 갤러리.

세구, 릴파, 비챤 마법요정의 능력일 가능성도 있다, 구독자 178만 유튜버인 침착맨은 기존 팬카페를 대신하여 유머 사이트를 운영하겠다고 밝히자, 일부 악플러들이 불만을 쏟아내었습니다, 침착맨x티빙 귀칼 드디어 본 사람의 귀멸의 칼날 같이보기 live 티빙 id만 있다면 누구나 무료. 관련게시물 오늘자 침착맨 윤서인 일침 떴다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ역시 팩트 폭행은. Com › community › board인방 베글 침착맨 귀칼 재미없어서 하차했다고 한 적 없어. 국내 최대 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

군루 보옥요람 다양한 디자인과 diy 키링 꾸미기에 대한 소개가 가득합니다. 라디오 드라마 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 그는 피라미드 게임에서 원작 속 캐릭터와 높은. 정확히는 스케쥴 때문에 시간이 없어서 못 봤고 어쩔수없이 13화까지만 보고 끝낸거고이번에 티빙 측에서 제의 들어와서. 지난 29일 침착맨은 자신의 트위치 채널에서 방송을 진행했다. 차등중력을 간략하게 쓰면 read more. 골드 앤 그레이브스

굿닥터 갤러리 네즈코의 캐릭터가 너무 매력적, 유니크한 매력이 있다. 침착맨 혼자 하려고 하지 말고 누군가랑 같이 해라. 침착맨 유투브 및 라이브 후기 자유롭게 남기는 공간 침착맨 유튜브 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 26 1418 침착맨 확실히 귀칼 단점 얘기할 때 좀 디테일함 ㅋㅋ. 침착맨 유투브 및 라이브 후기 자유롭게 남기는 공간 침착맨 유튜브 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 공유와잎

구닝딸 Com › mgallery › board침착맨 귀칼 113화 감상평 치지직 마이너 갤러리. 26 1418 침착맨 확실히 귀칼 단점 얘기할 때 좀 디테일함 ㅋㅋ. 정보 침착맨 티빙에서 귀칼 1기 같이보기 침착한삶 마이너. Com › mgallery › board침착맨이랑 귀칼 봐야지 치지직 마이너 갤러리. 침착맨과 시청자들을 강렬하게 노려보는 커다란 흑표범 모형. 권가현 야동

고화질 쿠로미 배경화면 Com › mgallery › board침착맨 유튜브 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. Com › 8829495956만약 평일에 침착맨 귀칼 본다고 하는 순간 치지직 에펨코리아. 정확히는 스케쥴 때문에 시간이 없어서 못 봤고 어쩔수없이 13화까지만 보고 끝낸거고이번에 티빙 측에서 제의 들어와서. 관련게시물 오늘자 침착맨 윤서인 일침 떴다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ역시 팩트 폭행은. 지난 29일 침착맨은 자신의 트위치 채널에서 방송을 진행했다.

과거에 무슨 일이 있었던 것 같은 가정부 로봇 밥 시켜서 얘기하면서 음식만 존나 쳐다봄 영화를 보라고 제발 왜 영화를 read more. 밥 시켜서 얘기하면서 음식만 존나 쳐다봄 영화를 보라고 제발 왜 영화를 read more. 차등중력을 간략하게 쓰면 read more. 미츠리는 몸매가 좋고 근력이 뛰어나며, 분홍색에서 연두색으로 자연스레 연결되는 머리카락을 가지고 있다. 차등중력을 간략하게 쓰면 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.