Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Lol 슼뽕티비는 슼 빨아주니깐 수요라도 있을텐데 이 채널은. 14 2131 세구 슼뽕티비 뭔데 ㅋㅋ. 티원 소식 쇼츠로 보고 슥 넘기는라이트팬들이 넘사벽으로 많아서대충 썸네일에다가 왕의 귀환. 슼뽕티비 너무 대놓고여서 역겹긴했어 썸네일부터 너무 3.

Redgif.cim

일반 슼뽕티비가 진짜 심연중에 심연인듯. 14 2151 갑자기 김똘복 생각나서 검색해봤는데 방송안하길래 트위치트래커에서 검색해보니. Com › 8628781788우히 슼뽕티비 키리누키 올라왔네 버튜버 에펨코리아.

Pikpak Saku_j

젠지전 이겼을때 리딸 맛집울프 플레임처럼 슼뽕티비로 해주는게 아닌 티원 이기는거에 빡쳐서 물병찌그려 트리고 빡종해서 그렇다고. 갱맘아 페이커 뜌따 보고도 그런소리 나오냐, 슼뽕이 찬다할까나, straykids 승민 아이엔 괜찮아도괜찮아 fyp 오리지널 지금 위티비에서 시청 가능 벙어리아내 wetv 중국드라마 로맨스드라마, 갱맘아 페이커 뜌따 보고도 그런소리 나오냐.

제우스땐 증거없이 누구보다 앞장서서 패던애가 이번 구스대전 낙하산 의혹은 공식 입장문이 있는데도 정확하게 밝혀진게 없으니 악의적 해석 자제 이러고 있음ㅋㅋ dc official app. 120 원래 롤 채널도 아닌데 갑자기 슼뽕채널로 바뀐 신기한 채널임 ㅋㅋㅋ 03. 레벨23 플레임은 슼뽕티비 그 자체라서. 그런것들은 시청자입장에서 경기보면서 알기도 힘들고 알아도 배워야지 가 아니라 이걸 경기중에 계속한다고.

Ray Series Cast

이시간에 클템 유튜브 리플 관리되는구나 2.. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 lck 인기글 목록 2023.. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ아니 그냥 엘리스 잘못 걸려서 피 갈리고 집 간거 아니냐고너무 슼뽕티비 아니야..

Com › mgallery › board그미드가 라이즈 저렇게 했으면 슼뽕티비 조회수 터졌을듯 ㅋㅋ 젠지. 레벨23 플레임은 슼뽕티비 그 자체라서, 유튜브 슼뽕티비 근황ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 제우스땐 증거없이 누구보다 앞장서서 패던애가 이번 구스대전 낙하산 의혹은 공식 입장문이 있는데도 정확하게 밝혀진게 없으니 악의적 해석 자제 이러고 있음ㅋㅋ dc official app 작성자 ㅇㅇ고정닉, 갱맘아 페이커 뜌따 보고도 그런소리 나오냐.

Pikpak Teen Nude

8챌린지로 밝혀진 진짜 역겨운 약코 직업 150 메이플 일단 수정된 8, Com › board › view깸빗 슼뽕티비 대표였음, 버튜버 너이런거보니 인기글 목록 2025. 슼뽕 개그티비에 밀리네 아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ마따형 시발ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ개콘 왜 봄ㅋ. 250 아니 근데 슼갈이 정신승리하겠다는데 니가 뭔 상관이라 불편하고 짜증내는거임. 걍 lck 리뷰 하지 말었어야 ㅇㅇ 결국 슼뽕티비에 손대자나.

슼뽕튜브 보고와서 왜곡되고 편향된 정보를 가지고 갈드컵 참전하는게심지어 롤을 해본적 없어서 롤에 대한 배경지식은 1도없음.. 예전에 유튭채널봤을땐 속된말로 슼뽕티비.. 이시간에 클템 유튜브 리플 관리되는구나 2..

Redgof

일반 슼뽕티비가 진짜 심연중에 심연인듯, 슼뽕티비 너무 대놓고여서 역겹긴했어 썸네일부터 너무 3. Com › 6395178849세구 슼뽕티비 뭔데 ㅋㅋ 치지직 에펨코리아. 버튜버 너이런거보니 인기글 목록 2025. 난 그 슼뽕티비가 좆같은게 lol 인벤.

planetsuzy 이시간에 클템 유튜브 리플 관리되는구나 2. 젠지전 이겼을때 리딸 맛집울프 플레임처럼 슼뽕티비로 해주는게 아닌 티원 이기는거에 빡쳐서 물병찌그려 트리고 빡종해서 그렇다고. 17 로아 전재학 지금 진짜 손놓은거임. 14 2151 갑자기 김똘복 생각나서 검색해봤는데 방송안하길래 트위치트래커에서 검색해보니. 이젠 슼뽕티비 레퍼드 조차도 웃음벨이 되는 미친기간 ㅋㅋ. qhdlf

povkorea nude Com › 8065106610hle고해성사 인기글 슼뽕채널 과격해지기전에는 억빠한적있음 롤. 쟤들도 먹고 살아야될거아냐 ㅋㅋ 로아 대통령 재판 중지법 이거뭐임. 8챌린지로 밝혀진 진짜 역겨운 약코 직업 150 메이플 일단 수정된 8. 원래 수가 많으면 극렬해지는게 스포츠판이지만티원극렬팬들은 좀 과한데그런애들 상대로 조회수빨이하려고 증오컨텐츠생산하는 애들이 문제임대체. 슼갈들이 원하는건 젠지돈받는 스트리머가어케든 슼트코인올라타보려고 비굴하게 애원하는 모습을 보면서 갑질하는 쾌감을 대리로 느껴보고싶던건데그걸 모르고 젠지 버리고 슼뽕티비탑승하려한게슼은 상도덕때문에라도 앰비션당연히 못받고젠지딱지 떼진 늙고병든정글러를 대체 슼갈들이 왜. ratata 히토미

pikpak ririsu 87 로아 세계최초 티밍안하면 병신되는게임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 179 fco. S 유튜브 다양한 전략을 소화할 수 있다는 것은. 갱맘아 페이커 뜌따 보고도 그런소리 나오냐. 페이커가 있는 리그의 공식컨텐츠가그냥 슼코인빠는 슼뽕티비 123한테 개쳐발리는 상태를 만들어놓는것도진짜 능력이라면. 저번에 숙소생활하다가 짐싸서 나왔던 슼충이임 저기 아랫글에 피넛 깃창 어쩌구 하는 글 있길래 생각나서 끄적여봄 입단테스트때는 솔랭점수, 라인전 아마x, read more. pikpak secret japan

pixxarmom.net transform challenges into family 24 1148 조회수가 잘나오는게 문제긴해 그사람들은 그냥 돈벌라고 슼뽕티비 하는거니까 쇼창섭 2025. 쟤들도 먹고 살아야될거아냐 ㅋㅋ 로아 대통령 재판 중지법 이거뭐임. 마왕님은 안해주나 존나맛잇을거같은데 ㅠㅠ 잡담 함장은 끝. 롤 리그 오브 레전드 잡담 인기글 목록 2025. 레벨23 플레임은 슼뽕티비 그 자체라서.

pikpak 福建兄妹 Bemkblxj5kavg걍 진짜 슼뽕티비 보는거 같음. 라는 말을 남겼고제우스 사가에서 제우스옹호하다 버림받았다이게 슼뽕티비. 10 2011 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ best dk_keria 2023. 난 그 슼뽕티비가 좆같은게 lol 인벤. 울프 유튜브 썸네일 슼뽕티비 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.